Skip to content

Conversation

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 13, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1915. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18403/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 13, 2014

QA results for PR 1915:
- This patch FAILED unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18403/consoleFull

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, test this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 13, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1915. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18484/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 13, 2014

QA results for PR 1915:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18484/consoleFull

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor Author

merged to master and 1.1

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2014
Author: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>

Closes #1915 from marmbrus/arrayUDF and squashes the following commits:

a1c503d [Michael Armbrust] Support for udfs that take complex types

(cherry picked from commit 9256d4a)
Signed-off-by: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9256d4a Aug 14, 2014
@marmbrus marmbrus deleted the arrayUDF branch August 27, 2014 20:43
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
Author: Michael Armbrust <[email protected]>

Closes apache#1915 from marmbrus/arrayUDF and squashes the following commits:

a1c503d [Michael Armbrust] Support for udfs that take complex types
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants