Skip to content

Conversation

@viirya
Copy link
Member

@viirya viirya commented Sep 7, 2017

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #19050 to deal with ExistenceJoin case.

How was this patch tested?

Added test.

@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Sep 7, 2017

cc @gatorsmile for review. Thanks.

@viirya viirya force-pushed the SPARK-21835-followup branch from 4fc4d05 to f05f281 Compare September 7, 2017 00:28
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 7, 2017

Test build #81486 has finished for PR 19151 at commit 4fc4d05.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 7, 2017

Test build #81489 has finished for PR 19151 at commit f05f281.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@gatorsmile
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Merged to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in ce7293c Sep 7, 2017
@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Sep 7, 2017

Thanks @gatorsmile

@viirya viirya deleted the SPARK-21835-followup branch December 27, 2023 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants