Skip to content

Conversation

@ash211
Copy link
Contributor

@ash211 ash211 commented Nov 8, 2017

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Add clarifying documentation to the scaladoc of functions.hash

How was this patch tested?

Existing tests, though this is a docs-only change.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 8, 2017

Test build #83595 has finished for PR 19694 at commit 94278a7.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Apr 23, 2018

This is true, and probably will stay true, but is it something a caller needs to know and that we want to document as a guarantee?

@srowen srowen mentioned this pull request May 11, 2018
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 348ddfd May 12, 2018
zifeif2 pushed a commit to zifeif2/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
Closes apache#20458
Closes apache#20530
Closes apache#20557
Closes apache#20966
Closes apache#20857
Closes apache#19694
Closes apache#18227
Closes apache#20683
Closes apache#20881
Closes apache#20347
Closes apache#20825
Closes apache#20078

Closes apache#21281
Closes apache#19951
Closes apache#20905
Closes apache#20635

Author: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

Closes apache#21303 from srowen/ClosePRs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants