Skip to content

Conversation

@kiszk
Copy link
Member

@kiszk kiszk commented Aug 29, 2018

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is an follow-up PR of #21087 based on [a discussion thread](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21087#discussion_r211080067]. Since #21087 changed a condition of if statement, the message in an exception is not consistent of the current behavior.
This PR updates the exception message.

How was this patch tested?

Existing UTs

@kiszk
Copy link
Member Author

kiszk commented Aug 29, 2018

cc @gatorsmile

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 29, 2018

Test build #95425 has finished for PR 22269 at commit f789450.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

Retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 29, 2018

Test build #95429 has finished for PR 22269 at commit f789450.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Aug 30, 2018

Merged to master

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9e0f959 Aug 30, 2018
fjh100456 pushed a commit to fjh100456/spark that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2018
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is an follow-up PR of apache#21087 based on [a discussion thread](apache#21087 (comment)]. Since apache#21087 changed a condition of `if` statement, the message in an exception is not consistent of the current behavior.
This PR updates the exception message.

## How was this patch tested?

Existing UTs

Closes apache#22269 from kiszk/SPARK-23997-followup.

Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants