-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-24913][SQL] Make AssertNotNull and AssertTrue non-deterministic #22947
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
332db30
[SPARK-24913][SQL] Make AssertNotNull and AssertTrue non-deterministic
mgaido91 895e095
fix test failures
mgaido91 4bd7c2d
fix test failures
mgaido91 0a02dd9
Revert "fix test failures"
mgaido91 129d4f7
Revert "fix test failures"
mgaido91 1caa284
introduce hasSideEffect
mgaido91 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, this two expressions are very commonly used in other expressions' children. Making them non-deterministic will make such expressions as non-deterministic too, e.g., encoders. It might have big impact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, that's true. The change may be big indeed. I am open to other proposals, as creating a new
sideEffectflag in theExpression.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because of this, I'm leaning towards creating a new flag instead of making them non-deterministic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, thanks you all the comments. I'll try and add a new flag. I'll update the PR as soon as I have a solution for that. Probably it will take some time, though, as I will have to recheck all the usage of
determistic.... Thanks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/apache/hive/blob/master/ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/udf/generic/GenericUDFAssertTrue.java#L45 Hive also marks it as non-deterministic.
cc @maryannxue too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gatorsmile thanks for your comment. I think the main issue with making this non-determistic is that we have basically to skip the sanity check at
spark/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
Line 368 in 0a32238
AssertNotNullis a lot of other different locations. Another option may be to special caseAssertNotNulland avoid that check for it... What do you think?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any comment on this @gatorsmile @maryannxue ?