-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-26339][SQL]Throws better exception when reading files that start with underscore #23446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2910cb9
Throws better exception when reading files that start with underscore
08850ae
Clarify the message further with a different exception for file which…
777b4db
Revert "Clarify the message further with a different exception for fi…
c0a57d9
Revert "Throws better exception when reading files that start with un…
1b64ffb
Log a debug statement about files/directories that are ignored, and t…
a95637e
Change to check only filename match, not check dir recursively
239cfa4
Avoid checkFilesExist check
e72bf00
Minor modifications for clarity
abfe2e6
Remove debugStatement test
3708ef1
Fix title of test case
92934b4
Add checkFileExist again
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| year,make,model,comment,blank | ||
| "2012","Tesla","S","No comment", | ||
|
|
||
| 1997,Ford,E350,"Go get one now they are going fast", | ||
| 2015,Chevy,Volt | ||
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am afraid this could break the existing applications. Currently, when users specify the schema, no exception is thrown, right?
cc @HyukjinKwon @srowen @MaxGekk @cloud-fan
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, it was discussed:
#23288 (comment)
#23288 (review)
I don't have a strong opinion on this. If you think it should be considered as a behaviour change, yea, no objection from me. We can turn it to warning.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please submit a follow-up PR to change it to a warning? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, let me make a followup by the end of today (singapore time)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that's a fair point. It might not have thrown an exception later if it didn't try to infer schema.