Skip to content

[SPARK-28143][SQL] Expressions without proper constructors should throw AnalysisException #24947

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
yaooqinn wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

[SPARK-28143][SQL] Expressions without proper constructors should throw AnalysisException #24947

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
4af96a1
[SPARK-28143][SQL]IN expression missing attribute should throw analys…
yaooqinn Jun 24, 2019
9ca1990
bring back filter logic and and an or condition
yaooqinn Jun 24, 2019
15c67d6
if valid paras count == 0
yaooqinn Jun 25, 2019
30ef47e
unified err msg
yaooqinn Jun 25, 2019
a0363de
add some hints when the registered function is defined wrong or misused
yaooqinn Jul 26, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -583,7 +583,9 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
val validParametersCount = constructors
.filter(_.getParameterTypes.forall(_ == classOf[Expression]))
Copy link
Member

@gatorsmile gatorsmile Jul 22, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we remove this line, what is the outcome?

In this PR, the logic is to add a special case. When unable to find a constructor whose parameters are all Expressions, we use the remaining constructors. [Note, headOption means we only choose the first one] Could you please check whether we should list all of them in the error messages?

Copy link
Member Author

@yaooqinn yaooqinn Jul 22, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we remove this line, it works fine. I did this in the first commit of the pr, discussed with HyukjinKwon here

Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon Jul 26, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, It doesn't work fine.
We should only recognise the constructor with expressions because those are only able to be used in SQL. Otherwise, it shows incorrect information about possible argument combination which partially reverts #21226.

Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon Jul 26, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is that we have function registered in but that's unable/not supposed to to call via in(...) currently. Possibly there might be more cases like this.

.map(_.getParameterCount).distinct.sorted
val expectedNumberOfParameters = if (validParametersCount.length == 1) {
val expectedNumberOfParameters = if (validParametersCount.isEmpty) {
constructors.headOption.map(_.getParameterCount).getOrElse(0).toString
Copy link
Member

@gatorsmile gatorsmile Jul 22, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using headIption is hacky. We should follow the same logic what we are doing here.

} else if (validParametersCount.length == 1) {
Copy link
Member

@HyukjinKwon HyukjinKwon Jun 26, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yaooqinn, can you show the error message before and after this change, and fix the PR description and title? I think this PR now targets throw a better exception for the expression that has no constructors to call.

validParametersCount.head.toString
} else {
validParametersCount.init.mkString("one of ", ", ", " and ") +
Expand Down
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,6 +106,13 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with SharedSQLContext {
checkKeywordsExist(sql("describe functioN abcadf"), "Function: abcadf not found.")
}

test("SPARK-28143: IN expression missing attribute should throw analysis exception") {
// missing attribute, which actually might be `select 1 where a in ()`
val query = "select 1 where in ()"
val e = intercept[AnalysisException](sql(query))
assert(e.getMessage.startsWith("Invalid number of arguments for function in"))
}

test("SPARK-14415: All functions should have own descriptions") {
for (f <- spark.sessionState.functionRegistry.listFunction()) {
if (!Seq("cube", "grouping", "grouping_id", "rollup", "window").contains(f.unquotedString)) {
Expand Down