[SPARK-28292][SQL] Enable Injection of User-defined Hint

[gatorsmile]

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Move the rule RemoveAllHints after the batch Resolution.

Why are the changes needed?

User-defined hints can be resolved by the rules injected via extendedResolutionRules or postHocResolutionRules.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Added a test case

[SparkQA]

Test build #110428 has finished for PR 25746 at commit 5ea0e89.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[AngersZhuuuu]

This way will be more flexible. Thanks .

[cloud-fan]

LGTM

[dongjoon-hyun]

Hi, @gatorsmile . Shall we remove [WIP]?

[dongjoon-hyun]

Retest this please.

[SparkQA]

Test build #110841 has finished for PR 25746 at commit 5ea0e89.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[SparkQA]

Test build #110842 has finished for PR 25746 at commit 5ea0e89.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[gatorsmile]

We need to add a test case to ensure the other user-added hints can be added and recognized.

[dongjoon-hyun]

Got it. Thank you for making this change, @gatorsmile !

[SparkQA]

Test build #111203 has finished for PR 25746 at commit 15d3958.

• This patch fails Spark unit tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[gatorsmile]

retest this please

[kiszk]

nit: How was this patch tested? should be also updated now.

[SparkQA]

Test build #111226 has finished for PR 25746 at commit 15d3958.

• This patch passes all tests.
• This patch merges cleanly.
• This patch adds no public classes.

[cloud-fan]

thanks, merging to master!