-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-37455][SQL] Replace hash with sort aggregate if child is already sorted #34702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6448864
Replace hash agg with sort agg if child is already sorted
c21 a683137
Do not replace hash agg if grouping expression is empty
c21 e8609fd
Fix unit test failure
c21 cff1424
Check the approach to check partial agg based on logical plan instead
c21 8ce7d27
Disable rule by default and back out TPCDS plan change
c21 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Check the approach to check partial agg based on logical plan instead
- Loading branch information
commit cff1424c07d8423bd9d05c8f001b136dcbb26a75
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like reverse enginering the
AggUtils. Could we just link the partial and final agg when they are constructed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tanelk - yeah I agree this is mostly reverse engineering and we can do a better job here. I tried link partial and final agg in
AggUtilsand check linked physical plan to be same or not. This does not quite work due to we are doing top-down planning, and the linked partial agg not being same as planned partial agg (havingPlanLateroperator in linked partial agg).I found a more elegant way to do it, by checking the linked logical plan of both aggs to be same. Updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @cloud-fan for review, thanks.