Skip to content

Conversation

@dbtsai
Copy link
Member

@dbtsai dbtsai commented Dec 30, 2014

#1379 is automatically closed by asfgit, and github can not reopen it once it's closed, so this will be the new PR.

Binary Logistic Regression can be extended to Multinomial Logistic Regression by running K-1 independent Binary Logistic Regression models. The following formula is implemented.
http://www.slideshare.net/dbtsai/2014-0620-mlor-36132297/25

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 30, 2014

Test build #24878 has started for PR 3833 at commit a97b03a.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 30, 2014

Test build #24878 has finished for PR 3833 at commit a97b03a.

  • This patch fails to build.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24878/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 6, 2015

Test build #25072 has started for PR 3833 at commit 144a6ba.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 6, 2015

Test build #25072 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 144a6ba.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25072/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 8, 2015

Test build #25196 has started for PR 3833 at commit 91b445d.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 8, 2015

Test build #25196 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 91b445d.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25196/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25523 has started for PR 3833 at commit d12cc4f.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25528 has started for PR 3833 at commit fc7fabe.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25523 has finished for PR 3833 at commit d12cc4f.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25523/
Test FAILed.

@dbtsai
Copy link
Member Author

dbtsai commented Jan 14, 2015

Jenkins, please re-test again.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25528/
Test FAILed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25539 has started for PR 3833 at commit 06964d6.

  • This patch does not merge cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25540 has started for PR 3833 at commit 184a27e.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25540 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 184a27e.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25540/
Test PASSed.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25539 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 06964d6.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch does not merge cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25539/
Test FAILed.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will change this API, no? is that OK?

Also optional args are a bit Java-unfriendly. Maybe at least a helper constructor here that sets nClasses == 2

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed. thks.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25565 has started for PR 3833 at commit 7ac4dfc.

  • This patch does not merge cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 14, 2015

Test build #25565 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 7ac4dfc.

  • This patch fails to build.
  • This patch does not merge cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26491 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 4ce4d33.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class LogisticGradient(numClasses: Int) extends Gradient
    • logDebug(s"Did not load class $name from REPL class server at $uri", e)
    • logError(s"Failed to check existence of class $name on REPL class server at $uri", e)

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26491/
Test PASSed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to keep the original constructor to be backward compatible.

def this(weights: Vector, intercept: Double) = this(weights, intercept, weights.size, 2)

this(weights, intercept, featureSize) doesn't seem necessary to me.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Feb 2, 2015

LGTM except minor inline comments. Thanks for working on the math while taking care of precision!

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26531 has started for PR 3833 at commit 697b7c9.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26531 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 697b7c9.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26531/
Test FAILed.

@dbtsai
Copy link
Member Author

dbtsai commented Feb 2, 2015

Jenkins, please re-test again.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26543 has started for PR 3833 at commit 4e2f354.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26543 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 4e2f354.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26543/
Test FAILed.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Feb 2, 2015

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26549 has started for PR 3833 at commit 4e2f354.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 2, 2015

Test build #26549 has finished for PR 3833 at commit 4e2f354.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class LogisticGradient(numClasses: Int) extends Gradient

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26549/
Test PASSed.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b1aa8fe Feb 3, 2015
@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented Feb 3, 2015

Merged into master. Thanks for contributing MLOR! I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5537 for the user guide and assigned to you.

@dbtsai dbtsai deleted the mlor branch February 26, 2015 23:35
HyukjinKwon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade H2 from 2.1.214 to 2.2.220

[Changelog](https://www.h2database.com/html/changelog.html)

### Why are the changes needed?
[CVE-2022-45868](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45868)

The following change in the release note fixes the CVE.
[581ed18](h2database/h2database@581ed18) Merge pull request [#3833](https://github.com/h2database/h2database/issues/3833) from katzyn/password

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Pass GA

Closes #41963 from bjornjorgensen/h2-2.2.220.

Authored-by: Bjørn Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2024
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Upgrade H2 from 2.1.214 to 2.2.220

[Changelog](https://www.h2database.com/html/changelog.html)

### Why are the changes needed?
[CVE-2022-45868](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45868)

The following change in the release note fixes the CVE.
[581ed18](h2database/h2database@581ed18) Merge pull request [#3833](https://github.com/h2database/h2database/issues/3833) from katzyn/password

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Pass GA

Closes #41963 from bjornjorgensen/h2-2.2.220.

Authored-by: Bjørn Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants