Skip to content

Conversation

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

It's after #5189

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @marmbrus

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Apr 1, 2015

ok to test

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Apr 1, 2015

Thanks for reopening this. Sorry for missing your PR against my branch.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 1, 2015

Test build #29515 has finished for PR 5304 at commit c58c9b3.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • class Normalizer extends UnaryTransformer[Vector, Vector, Normalizer]
    • case class Data(
    • case class Data(
    • s" but class priors vector pi had $
    • s" but class conditionals array theta had $
    • case class Data(word: String, vector: Array[Float])
    • class LinearClassificationModel(LinearModel):
    • class LogisticRegressionModel(LinearClassificationModel):
    • class SVMModel(LinearClassificationModel):
    • class UDFRegistration(object):
    • class DataFrameNaFunctions(object):
    • class Analyzer(
    • trait CheckAnalysis
    • case class CreateStruct(children: Seq[NamedExpression]) extends Expression
    • case class AtLeastNNonNulls(n: Int, children: Seq[Expression]) extends Predicate
    • case class StringStartsWith(attribute: String, value: String) extends Filter
    • case class StringEndsWith(attribute: String, value: String) extends Filter
    • case class StringContains(attribute: String, value: String) extends Filter
  • This patch adds the following new dependencies:
    • avro-1.7.7.jar
    • breeze-macros_2.10-0.11.2.jar
    • breeze_2.10-0.11.2.jar
  • This patch removes the following dependencies:
    • avro-1.7.6.jar
    • breeze-macros_2.10-0.11.1.jar
    • breeze_2.10-0.11.1.jar

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @marmbrus , is it ready to go? Or should we create a companion object GetField and put resolveGetField into it?

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

marmbrus commented Apr 8, 2015

Sorry for the delay. I'm going to go ahead and merge so we don't forget to remove the duplication. I do like the idea of putting this in an object instead.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

(bump to get Spark PRs to refresh this)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants