-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29k
[SPARK-6740][SQL] Fix NOT operator precedence. #6326
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
58a62a7 to
3d8bf9a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of bind the rule booleanFactor with andExpression, a better place probably be expression rule. (https://github.com/smola/spark/blob/feature/operator-precedence/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/SqlParser.scala#L225)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chenghao-intel Not sure how. Adding the NOT clause in the expression rule would break precedence rules. Also, binding expression -> orExpression -> andExpression -> booleanFactor -> comparison is pretty much they way it is expressed in the grammars for standard SQL.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, sorry, my bad, I just picked up some corner case, it works.
|
Sorry for the delay here. Mind bringing this up to date? |
3d8bf9a to
f9e9021
Compare
|
@marmbrus Done. |
|
ok to test |
|
Test build #35151 has finished for PR 6326 at commit
|
|
Minor style issues: |
f9e9021 to
75b7c95
Compare
NOT has lower precedence than comparison operations.
75b7c95 to
fbc1815
Compare
|
Test build #35700 has finished for PR 6326 at commit
|
|
Test build #35701 has finished for PR 6326 at commit
|
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
|
@smola do you have time to fix the test failure so we can merge this for 1.5? |
|
Thanks for working on this @smola. I propose we close this issue until you have time to fix the test failures. |
…tions We can't parse `NOT` operator with comparison operations like `SELECT NOT TRUE > TRUE`, this PR fixed it. Takes over #6326. Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes #8617 from cloud-fan/not.
…tions We can't parse `NOT` operator with comparison operations like `SELECT NOT TRUE > TRUE`, this PR fixed it. Takes over apache/spark#6326. Author: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Closes #8617 from cloud-fan/not.
NOT has lower precedence than comparison operations.