Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

@pwendell and I discussed this a little more offline and concluded that it would be good to keep it more conservative. Losing cached blocks may be very expensive and we should only allow it if the user knows what he/she is doing.

FYI @harishreedharan @sryza.

@sryza
Copy link
Contributor

sryza commented Jul 9, 2015

LGTM

@harishreedharan
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 9, 2015

Test build #36956 has finished for PR 7329 at commit cef0b4e.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@lianhuiwang
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, but in the long term, we can flush cache block to disk and change blocks of executor to blocks of shuffle service. i think more about it and now it has some problem about shuffle service because now shuffle service just receive shuffle request.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lianhuiwang Yeah that's not a bad idea. We could also explore some off heap storage solution.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks guys, merging into master.

andrewor14 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2015
pwendell and I discussed this a little more offline and concluded that it would be good to keep it more conservative. Losing cached blocks may be very expensive and we should only allow it if the user knows what he/she is doing.

FYI harishreedharan sryza.

Author: Andrew Or <[email protected]>

Closes #7329 from andrewor14/da-cached-timeout and squashes the following commits:

cef0b4e [Andrew Or] Change timeout to infinity
@andrewor14 andrewor14 closed this Jul 10, 2015
@andrewor14 andrewor14 deleted the da-cached-timeout branch July 10, 2015 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants