Skip to content

Conversation

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @yu-iskw

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yu-iskw I also found a minor bug in lint-r that I just fixed. Please let me know if that is good. With this change lint-r passes on my machine

@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented Aug 28, 2015

@shivaram All right. I am checking this on my local machine. Please give me some minutes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just testing if we need this generic or not.

Add tests to check `na.omit` on a DataFrame
@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented Aug 28, 2015

LGTM

@shivaram
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool - lintr checks also seem to be passing now. I'll merge this once tests pass

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 28, 2015

Test build #41722 has finished for PR 8495 at commit 4758a87.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 28, 2015

Test build #41724 has finished for PR 8495 at commit 86e8f78.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 2f99c37 Aug 28, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2015
S3 function is at https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/stats/html/na.fail.html

Author: Shivaram Venkataraman <[email protected]>
Author: Shivaram Venkataraman <[email protected]>
Author: Yu ISHIKAWA <[email protected]>

Closes #8495 from shivaram/na-omit-fix.

(cherry picked from commit 2f99c37)
Signed-off-by: Shivaram Venkataraman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants