Utilize AI to maintain the registry

[suzuki-shunsuke]

What

Utilize AI to maintain the registry.

• Add a new package
• Review pull request
• Fix pull requests

Why

We have continuously improved the maintenance process of the registry.

• Documentation
  • Style Guide: https://aquaproj.github.io/docs/develop-registry/registry-style-guide
  • Reference: https://aquaproj.github.io/docs/reference/registry-config/
  • Contribution Guide: https://aquaproj.github.io/docs/products/aqua-registry/contributing
• JSON Schema: https://aquaproj.github.io/docs/reference/registry-config/#json-schema
• Develop tool: cmdx tasks, regsitry-tool
• CI

So in many cases you can add packages easily.

But the maintenance is still hard and depends on me.
It's hard for people other than me to fix code properly.
There are some rules, knowledges that are not documented well.

I usually review and fix pull requests, but the burden is high.

We should continue to improve the development tools registry-tool, but it's hard to fix all of them automatically.
I think we can utilize AI tools such as Cline, Claude Code, Gemini, and so on.
I'm not so familiar with AI, but I think we can prepare instruction for AI and ask AI to do some tasks.

Note

• Creating Agent SKILL to review pull requests #48743

[suzuki-shunsuke]

I'm not sure why this issue is downvoted 😕

[nikolay]

@suzuki-shunsuke Well, n=1, so it's not statistically significant.

[jdx]

claude has a github action that would probably make this pretty easy https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/github-actions

[jubr]

And if you don't feel like spending the $$, I think there's a way to use the free models on https://openrouter.ai by leveraging claude-code-router in the actions.

I just stumbled upon a short video explaining on how to do it.

Given the (in)stability of free models, perhaps better to try with "Pure Claude" first and se how it fares, you can then always optimize for $$ later.

[lucasew]

Isn't there any sponsorship program for open source projects? Perhaps GitHub Copilot.

[nikolay]

@lucasew You seem to be right, according to this discussion.