Skip to content

Conversation

@rakita
Copy link
Member

@rakita rakita commented Dec 16, 2024

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Valgrind Results:

==4418== Cachegrind, a cache and branch-prediction profiler
==4418== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Nicholas Nethercote et al.
==4418== Using Valgrind-3.18.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==4418== Command: target/release/revme bench snailtracer
==4418== 
--4418-- warning: L3 cache found, using its data for the LL simulation.
Running snailtracer example!
elapsed: 1.939245616s
==4418== 
==4418== I   refs:      462,393,851
==4418== I1  misses:          4,560
==4418== LLi misses:          4,119
==4418== I1  miss rate:        0.00%
==4418== LLi miss rate:        0.00%
==4418== 
==4418== D   refs:      213,429,001  (135,439,144 rd   + 77,989,857 wr)
==4418== D1  misses:        343,286  (    202,521 rd   +    140,765 wr)
==4418== LLd misses:        137,955  (      4,189 rd   +    133,766 wr)
==4418== D1  miss rate:         0.2% (        0.1%     +        0.2%  )
==4418== LLd miss rate:         0.1% (        0.0%     +        0.2%  )
==4418== 
==4418== LL refs:           347,846  (    207,081 rd   +    140,765 wr)
==4418== LL misses:         142,074  (      8,308 rd   +    133,766 wr)
==4418== LL miss rate:          0.0% (        0.0%     +        0.2%  )

@rakita rakita changed the title chore: set tx gas limit of snailtracer fix(revme): include correct bytecode for snailtracer Dec 16, 2024
@rakita rakita merged commit 159be28 into main Dec 16, 2024
27 checks passed
@rakita rakita deleted the rakita/snailtracer_gas_limit branch December 16, 2024 15:55
This was referenced Dec 16, 2024
royvardhan pushed a commit to royvardhan/revm that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
* chore: set tx gas limit of snailtracer

* rm inspector from snailtracer

* compile now

* Clippy

* ext

* fix contracts

* remove 'static
This was referenced Jan 7, 2025
This was referenced Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant