Skip to content

Conversation

toondaey
Copy link
Contributor

Encountered this while testing and discovered that log levels can only be set with all caps. From experience, most users will usually prefer lower cases hence this change.

@toondaey toondaey requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2025 15:15
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.47%. Comparing base (53274b6) to head (d97cbc5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...te/extractorutils/unstable/configuration/models.py 87.50% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #482      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.51%   80.47%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          43       43              
  Lines        4038     4046       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         3251     3256       +5     
- Misses        787      790       +3     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...te/extractorutils/unstable/configuration/models.py 84.21% <87.50%> (+0.13%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@toondaey toondaey added the waiting-for-risk-review Waiting for a member of the risk review team to take an action label Sep 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
waiting-for-risk-review Waiting for a member of the risk review team to take an action
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants