Skip to content

Conversation

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 commented May 5, 2023

resolves #7517

Description

This flag must not have the relevant tests, or this wouldn't have been able to slip through during this re-factor. And I didn't add any relevant tests.

Maybe the reviewer would be so kind as to add them? 🙏 Will offer co-authorship as a reward 😎

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have signed the CLA
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • 👈 This PR includes tests
  • Docs changes are not required/relevant for this PR
  • I have run changie new to create a changelog entry

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 requested review from a team as code owners May 5, 2023 19:30
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 requested review from aranke and emmyoop and removed request for a team May 5, 2023 19:30
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label May 5, 2023
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 added the ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering label May 5, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@aranke aranke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@dbeatty10
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing and re-opening to try to re-trigger this CI check:

image

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 closed this May 6, 2023
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 reopened this May 6, 2023
@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

jtcohen6 commented May 7, 2023

I do not know why the snyk check seems to be hanging on all PRs :( If we can't figure it out early this week, I can disable it as a required check.

@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 merged commit 19d6dab into main May 8, 2023
@dbeatty10 dbeatty10 deleted the dbeatty/invert-print-check branch May 8, 2023 13:20
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
jtcohen6 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
(cherry picked from commit 19d6dab)

Co-authored-by: Doug Beatty <[email protected]>
@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented May 9, 2023

@dbeatty10 Thank you for quickly fixing it. Can you tell me when dbt-core 1.5.1 gets available? I would like to know the fixed version right now.

@jtcohen6
Copy link
Contributor

jtcohen6 commented May 9, 2023

We'll be putting out a release candidate of 1.5.1 this week, including all fixes that have been merged far

@aranke aranke mentioned this pull request May 9, 2023
6 tasks
@yu-iskw
Copy link
Contributor

yu-iskw commented May 10, 2023

@jtcohen6 Thank you for sharing the information. I look forward to it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla:yes ready_for_review Externally contributed PR has functional approval, ready for code review from Core engineering

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CT-2535] [Regression] Print flag inverted in dbt v1.5.0

5 participants