Skip to content

Conversation

@warrickball
Copy link
Contributor

This is an initial set of editorial tweaks to the JOSS paper following the successful review. Most of these are to the citation style and bits of capitalisation. If you're happy with the changes and merge them (or selectively apply some yourself), I'll launch a test run of our publication pipeline as soon as the archive is created and the relevant metadata set. There might be another set of changes if the publication pipeline doesn't parse the metadata correctly but it looks okay to me so far.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.06%. Comparing base (710b65c) to head (2ba1e65).
⚠️ Report is 124 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1169      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.25%   85.06%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          69       69              
  Lines        3521     3528       +7     
==========================================
- Hits         3002     3001       -1     
- Misses        519      527       +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mschwamb mschwamb self-requested a review September 29, 2025 16:27
@mschwamb mschwamb merged commit 8df8def into dirac-institute:main Sep 29, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants