-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
Update KnownRuntimePack as part of updating KnownFrameworkReference #39965
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1590349&view=results tests this workaround against the commits from #39853 pre-SDK update |
dougbu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not clear what you intend @pranavkm. As-is, the change does nothing because the %(LatestRuntimeFrameworkVersion) metadata is updated earlier in exactly the same way.
|
@dougbu the targets currently update |
dougbu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I understand now. Do we need to do this w/ the @(KnownAppHostPack) item for the default Core TFM too❔
|
Further details - the version for |
I suppose we should - it's also got the SDK-specified version. That said, I don't know how that package gets used in the build. |
I'm not positive either. I suspect your new commit will primarily affect tests that execute @wtgodbe anything we should be concerned about❔ For example, are there cases where the versions won't align❔ Versions for the app host, runtime pack, and framework reference all match in the couple of SDKs I checked. Just wondering if I'm missing anything in how dotnet/runtime pushes new packages during servicing. |
|
I'm not aware of any reason the runtime versions in an SDK would mismatch across ApphostPack/Runtime pack/Framework Reference - @dsplaisted any corner cases we should be aware of? |
|
Didn't realize components-e2e was the failing job, here's the real test: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_build/results?buildId=1590790&view=results |
|
Test build worked, merge away |
I think those versions will always be the same. This looks good to me. |
|
Hi @dsplaisted. It looks like you just commented on a closed PR. The team will most probably miss it. If you'd like to bring something important up to their attention, consider filing a new issue and add enough details to build context. |

No description provided.