Documentation: cross build of corefx for arm #6845
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <[email protected]>
|
/cc @jkotas, @benpye , @stephentoub |
| ================================== | ||
|
|
||
| Through cross compilation, on Linux it is possible to build CoreFX for arm or arm64. | ||
| It is almost similiar to the cross compilation procedure of CoreCLR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: almost similar => very similar
|
This is very nice. Thanks for adding it. LGTM. |
|
Is it correct to say that the managed binaries are OS and arch specific? OS On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, 11:46 Stephen Toub, [email protected] wrote:
|
They are architecture-independent (part of the reason we have the native shims). Many of the managed binaries are OS-independent, e.g. System.Linq.dll. Some are OS-specific, e.g. System.IO.FileSystem.dll, with different builds for Windows vs Unix. A few have different builds for different Unix flavors as well, e.g. System.Diagnostics.Process.dll has a different build for Linux vs OS X. |
Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim <[email protected]>
|
@benpye, @stephentoub, 👍 Updated wrong explanation. |
Documentation: cross build of corefx for arm
…ation Documentation: cross build of corefx for arm Commit migrated from dotnet/corefx@1dc0361
5 participants
Let's add a document how to do cross build of corefx for ARM[64]
Signed-off-by: Geunsik Lim [email protected]