-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 842
Fix namespace auto open if parsed input is empty #5040
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
KevinRansom
merged 1 commit into
dotnet:master
from
vasily-kirichenko:fix-namespace-auto-open-on-completion
Jun 1, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to do this anytime there is an empty ast?
What if we have a comment at the top of the file with open declarations below it? Would that mean the new open declaration will go above the comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, could we find out why the ast is empty?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Or maybe on top of the comment. Why?
Why? We cannot find a position to insert the open statement, that's enough. Or you suggest to fix the parser?..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TIHan
I looked at this, and it seems like the right fix to me, tryFindNearestPointAndModules is looking for the nearest open so that it can insert the new one below it, and finds none.
In findNearestPointToInsertOpenDeclaration when no open was found it quite reasonably says. Oh well, I couldn't find anywhere to insert the open, I guess I will use the top of the file.
It might be interesting to skip over leading comments, but that is a new feature and is not the intent of this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Skipping over comments would be not be trivial as we don't retain comments in the AST.
The reasoning why I mentioned it was because I thought the AST was giving us nothing even if we had open declarations, and we would just shove a open declaration at the top of the others, potentially skipping a comment if there was one there. However, I misinterpreted this. The case he is fixing is when there are no open declarations, which makes this fix absolutely fine.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vasily-kirichenko Thank you for your continued work.
In the future, I recommend being more descriptive in the PRs rather than only showing a GIF. A GIF is great, but we need context.