[net8.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/installer

[dotnet-maestro]

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/installer

• Subscription: 9a2944cb-7dee-4bf2-a65c-08dabd10ae64
• Build: 20230306.1
• Date Produced: March 6, 2023 10:15:46 AM UTC
• Commit: 51e06f6931e859f56564556fa6ba519761fa7141
• Branch: refs/heads/main

• Updates:
  • Microsoft.Dotnet.Sdk.Internal: from 8.0.100-preview.2.23108.2 to 8.0.100-preview.3.23156.1
  • Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23107.1 to 8.0.0-preview.2.23127.4
  • Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Ref: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23107.2 to 8.0.0-preview.3.23127.13
  • Microsoft.NETCore.App.Ref: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23107.1 to 8.0.0-preview.2.23127.4
  • Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-8.0.100-preview.2: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23081.3 to 8.0.0-preview.2.23113.1

Coherency Updates

The following updates ensure that dependencies with a CoherentParentDependency
attribute were produced in a build used as input to the parent dependency's build.
See Dependency Description Format

• Coherency Updates:
  • Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23107.1 to 8.0.0-preview.2.23127.4 (parent: Microsoft.Dotnet.Sdk.Internal)
  • Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Ref: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23107.2 to 8.0.0-preview.3.23127.13 (parent: Microsoft.Dotnet.Sdk.Internal)
  • Microsoft.NETCore.App.Ref: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23107.1 to 8.0.0-preview.2.23127.4 (parent: Microsoft.Dotnet.Sdk.Internal)
  • Microsoft.NET.Workload.Emscripten.Current.Manifest-8.0.100-preview.2: from 8.0.0-preview.2.23081.3 to 8.0.0-preview.2.23113.1 (parent: Microsoft.NETCore.App.Ref)

[github-actions]

.net ChangeLog for #17518

Level 1

• https://github.com/dotnet/installer 5a84050...51e06f6
• https://github.com/dotnet/runtime e71a4fb...2bdc3cb
• https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore cec7fbf...3265dc6
• https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk 1d9df33...a117e26
• https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk 1d9df33...d7ff0aa
• https://github.com/dotnet/cecil 1d9df33...68e0c35

Level 2

• https://github.com/dotnet/windowsdesktop 35e6817...b2e1a58
• https://github.com/dotnet/sdk 516144c...58b78dc
• https://github.com/dotnet/winforms 29484dd...83f3a84
• https://github.com/dotnet/wpf 22d2efb...f76bd1c
• https://github.com/dotnet/fsharp 6e28044...2f802c7
• https://github.com/microsoft/vstest ef449ea...05c0c4c
• https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn 8da03f9...22bdff5
• https://github.com/dotnet/msbuild fc3ab4c...a8416ab
• https://github.com/nuget/nuget.client 419ab86...4d5af8a
• https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk 3ae16c4...d7ff0aa
• https://github.com/dotnet/emsdk 3ae16c4...a117e26
• https://github.com/dotnet/source-build-externals 46f5e8e...487e399
• https://github.com/dotnet/arcade c453dfe...7f6d979
• https://github.com/dotnet/arcade-services 8b6dc24...b2a77aa
• https://github.com/dotnet/source-build-reference-packages d842772...a3ee227
• https://github.com/dotnet/sourcelink 4ad5e57...5585cd4
• https://github.com/dotnet/xliff-tasks ff7db52...95794aa

Generated using https://github.com/spouliot/dotnet-tools/tree/master/changelog

[rolfbjarne]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2]

🔥 [PR Build] Build failed 🔥

Build failed for the job 'Build packages'

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: $(GIT_HASH) [PR build]

[vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2]

🔥 [PR Build] Build failed 🔥

Build failed for the job 'Detect API changes'

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: $(GIT_HASH) [PR build]

[vs-mobiletools-engineering-service2]

🔥 Unable to find the contents for the comment: D:\a\1\s\change-detection\results\gh-comment.md does not exist :fire

Pipeline on Agent
Hash: 131bc9ee09bb8b88a0ba07f46f651212904f5f98 [PR build]

[rolfbjarne]

@marek-safar @sbomer there doesn't seem to be a version of the Microsoft.NET.ILLink package with the runtime versioning (8.0.0-preview.x.y.z), they're all of the old style (8.0.100-x.y.z):

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_artifacts/feed/dotnet8/NuGet/Microsoft.NET.ILLink/versions/8.0.100-1.23067.1

vs

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_artifacts/feed/dotnet8/NuGet/Microsoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks/versions/8.0.0-preview.2.23114.2

This is a problem because the latest Microsoft.NET.ILLink package (which we use as a ref pack for illink.dll), contains an illink.dll with assembly version of 8.0.100:

packages/microsoft.net.illink/8.0.100-1.22608.1/ref/net7.0/illink.dll (MD5: 348E615E37AA1B6A5899F63C4CC18EB8) illink, Version=8.0.100.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35

while the one loaded during the build has assembly version of 8.0.100:

packages/microsoft.net.illink.tasks/8.0.0-preview.2.23107.1/tools/net8.0/illink.dll (MD5: E5286F48E52751A95281FE7037931F89) illink, Version=8.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35:

which means that our dotnet-linker.dll references illink.dll 8.0.100, and won't load during the build:

builds/downloads/dotnet-sdk-8.0.100-preview.2.23113.3/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk/16.2.294-ci.darc-net8-0-7cab95c6-f843-42c8-a8a6-7c7eaf811f0a/tools/dotnet-linker/dotnet-linker.dll (MD5: 8E8A60942A13DE322FC6C72F21B8DD04) dotnet-linker, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null:
    References:
        illink, Version=8.0.100.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35
        [...]

eventually failing the build with:

ILLink error IL1027: Custom step 'Xamarin.SetupStep' could not be found.

I'm guessing this is because of dotnet/installer#15484.

[sbomer]

It looks like when we moved over the packaging logic to dotnet/runtime, we missed the Microsoft.NET.ILLink package: dotnet/runtime#79609. @ViktorHofer @tlakollo this package is needed because it contains a ref assembly with the APIs available to custom steps (illink plugins). Could one of you please take a look?