Skip to content

Conversation

@BrzVlad
Copy link
Member

@BrzVlad BrzVlad commented Sep 16, 2021

We store the var index in the guint16 slots of the instruction

…INT16

We store the var index in the guint16 slots of the instruction
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 16, 2021

Tagging subscribers to this area: @BrzVlad
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

We store the var index in the guint16 slots of the instruction

Author: BrzVlad
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-Codegen-Interpreter-mono

Milestone: -

@BrzVlad
Copy link
Member Author

BrzVlad commented Sep 16, 2021

Methods with more than 64k interp vars are potentially broken since #52242.

While this case is probably unlikely, since only certain code structure can trigger the issue, I think we might want to backport to 6.0 since it is a regression and the fix is trivial.

@lambdageek
Copy link
Member

/backport to release/6.0-rc2

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Started backporting to release/6.0-rc2: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/actions/runs/1245563875

@marek-safar marek-safar merged commit f95449c into dotnet:main Sep 17, 2021
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 3, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants