Skip to content

[release/7.0][wasm-mt] Fix pack/build issues in threaded builds #75171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
lewing merged 10 commits into from
Sep 8, 2022
Merged

[release/7.0][wasm-mt] Fix pack/build issues in threaded builds #75171

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
7c7ecb8
[wasm-mt] Build the threaded CoreLib if MonoWasmBuildVariant is 'mult…
lambdageek Sep 6, 2022
94c4e8b
Also fixup the BCL assemblies
lambdageek Sep 6, 2022
e5c2aae
[wasm-mt] look for WasmEnableThreads in user projects
lambdageek Sep 6, 2022
0fe387a
include dotnet.worker.js in runtime pack
lambdageek Sep 6, 2022
364323d
use set "preferDirectoryName" to true in WASM templates
lambdageek Sep 6, 2022
85789bd
fix whitespace
lambdageek Sep 6, 2022
76d0f01
when updating RuntimePackNamePatterns don't include net7 component
lambdageek Sep 7, 2022
a75226b
WBT: unset MonoWasmBuildVariant for the non-threaded runtime
lambdageek Sep 7, 2022
a0ee879
[WorkloadBuildTasks] remove the workload manifest net6/net7 hack
lambdageek Sep 7, 2022
27370f0
also build the JS interop library with threading if variant is used
lambdageek Sep 7, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
when updating RuntimePackNamePatterns don't include net7 component 
The workload resolver already did its job by the time this property is
updated, so we need to use patterns that correspond to actual nupkg
names (unversioned), not runtime pack alias names from the
manifest (versioned with 'net7')
  • Loading branch information
@lambdageek
lambdageek committed Sep 7, 2022
commit 76d0f015a69d3206ad658c6e1c6f2b91f8fc0557
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions ...ono/nuget/Microsoft.NET.Workload.Mono.Toolchain.net7.Manifest/WorkloadManifest.targets.in
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@
<KnownRuntimePack Update="@(KnownRuntimePack)">
<LatestRuntimeFrameworkVersion Condition="'%(KnownRuntimePack.TargetFramework)' == 'net7.0' and '%(KnownRuntimePack.RuntimePackLabels)' == 'Mono'">$(_MonoWorkloadRuntimePackPackageVersion)</LatestRuntimeFrameworkVersion>
<!-- Overrides for wasm threading support -->
<RuntimePackNamePatterns Condition="'$(RuntimeIdentifier)' == 'browser-wasm' and '$(WasmEnableThreads)' == 'true'">Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.multithread.net7.**RID**</RuntimePackNamePatterns>
<RuntimePackNamePatterns Condition="'$(RuntimeIdentifier)' == 'browser-wasm' and '$(WasmEnablePerfTracing)' == 'true'">Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.perftrace.net7.**RID**</RuntimePackNamePatterns>
<RuntimePackNamePatterns Condition="'$(RuntimeIdentifier)' == 'browser-wasm' and '$(WasmEnableThreads)' == 'true'">Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.multithread.**RID**</RuntimePackNamePatterns>
<RuntimePackNamePatterns Condition="'$(RuntimeIdentifier)' == 'browser-wasm' and '$(WasmEnablePerfTracing)' == 'true'">Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.Mono.perftrace.**RID**</RuntimePackNamePatterns>
Comment on lines +106 to +107
Copy link
Member

@radical radical Sep 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wondering - should we have WasmEnableThreading to match WasmEnablePerfTrac*ing*?

Copy link
Member Author

@lambdageek lambdageek Sep 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe. 😁

I'm not really happy with either of these names. "perf tracing" is not really a great name either.

I think the customer-facing names should be reworked over in net8.

Copy link
Member

@radical radical Sep 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lewing @steveisok thoughts?

Copy link
Member

@radical radical Sep 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In net8 we could try an item with list of features to enable, like the runtime components stuff.

Copy link
Member

@steveisok steveisok Sep 7, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have any good suggestions :-).

</KnownRuntimePack>
</ItemGroup>

Expand Down