Skip to content

Fixed #3674 -- Refactored _get_reverse_relationships() to use correct to_field #3696

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
benred42 wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Fixed #3674 -- Refactored _get_reverse_relationships() to use correct to_field #3696

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ce98c3d
Refactored _get_reverse_relationships() to use related object's pk fi…
Dec 2, 2015
21839e4
Modified build_relational_field() to change its behaviour if relation…
Dec 3, 2015
dae5a5c
Fixed Django1.9 compatibility and added test.
Dec 7, 2015
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
Refactored _get_reverse_relationships() to use related object's pk fi… 
…eld instead of current object's
  • Loading branch information
bphillips committed Dec 2, 2015
commit ce98c3d92179f65868f7c900867bc24140501f8f
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion rest_framework/utils/model_meta.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ def _get_reverse_relationships(opts):
model_field=None,
related_model=related,
to_many=relation.field.rel.multiple,
to_field=_get_to_field(relation.field),
to_field=_get_to_field(relation.field.model._meta.pk),
has_through_model=False
)

Expand Down