♻️ Simplify reset password logic by removing duplicate code #1440
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
youneshenniwrites
changed the title
youneshenniwrites
changed the title
alejsdev
changed the title
|
Hi @alejsdev @YuriiMotov, I don’t see a merge button for this PR. Could you let me know how I can merge it into |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request refactors the
reset_passwordAPI endpoint to delegate password hashing and database update logic to the existingcrud.update_usermethod.The original implementation in
reset_passwordcontained redundant code that is already handled incrud.py, resulting in unnecessary duplication.This refactor aims to keep the password update process and database queries in one place (
crud.py), making it easier to manage and update if needed.