Feature/geographic restriction

[frigini]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Feature-flagged geographic restriction that can return HTTP 451 with a structured error payload.

• Improvements

  • IBGE-backed geographic validation with caching and configurable allowed cities/states.
  • Centralized package pinning for feature management and test stubs (FeatureManagement, WireMock).
  • Module/DTO renames and subscription-tier enum alignment.

• Tests

  • Extensive unit and integration suites, WireMock-based fixtures, plus new geographic restriction scenarios (some tests conditionally skipped).

• Documentation

  • Roadmap, sprint checklists and integration test guides updated.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Adds feature-flagged geographic restriction (middleware, options, error model), IBGE integration (client, service, DTOs, caching), feature‑management registration, WireMock test infra and tests, package pins (Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore, WireMock.Net), and multiple module/contract renames (Location→Locations, Search→SearchProviders).

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Package pins & lockfiles \Directory.Packages.props`, `src/Shared/MeAjudaAi.Shared.csproj`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/*.csproj`, many `**/packages.lock.json`` files`	Add Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore (4.3.0) and WireMock.Net (1.16.0); propagate Microsoft.FeatureManagement and Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider across lockfiles.
Feature management & config \src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/Extensions.cs`, `src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.AppHost/appsettings.json`, `src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/appsettings.json`, `src/Modules/Providers/Infrastructure/appsettings.json`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/appsettings.Testing.json``	Register Feature Management; add FeatureManagement:GeographicRestriction flag (disabled by default; enabled in testing).
Geographic restriction middleware & payloads \src/Bootstrapper/.../Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs`, `src/Bootstrapper/.../Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs`, `src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs`, `src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs`, `src/Modules/Providers/API/...GetProvidersEndpoint.cs``	New middleware gated by feature flag; header parsing, IBGE or allow-list validation, fail-open rules, logs; returns HTTP 451 with structured JSON model and OpenAPI response mapping.
Shared geolocation contract & adapter \src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs`, `src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs``	New interface IGeographicValidationService and GeographicValidationService adapter; allowedCities parameter uses IReadOnlyCollection<string>.
IBGE models, client & service \src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/*`, `src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/Interfaces/IIbgeClient.cs`, `src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs`, `src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs`, `src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs``	Add IBGE DTOs (UF, Regiao, Mesorregiao, Microrregiao, Municipio), IIbgeClient interface + client, IIbgeService interface and IbgeService with caching, TTLs, and validation logic.
DI & HTTP client registrations \src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs`, `src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Extensions/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs``	Register IIbgeClient, IIbgeService, IGeographicValidationService; add IBGE HttpClient; bind GeographicRestrictionOptions; inject middleware into pipeline.
Middleware & model tests \tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs``	Unit tests covering middleware behavior, header parsing, IBGE fallback, logging, and a mock geographic validation service for tests.
Locations unit tests \src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/*``	Add IbgeClientTests and IbgeServiceTests: HTTP responses, error propagation, caching, and validation scenarios.
Integration tests & WireMock \tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/appsettings.Testing.json``	Add WireMockFixture to stub external APIs, wire integration tests to use WireMock, add many integration tests for geographic restriction and IBGE unavailability, and add testing config.
Endpoint OpenAPI & docs \src/Modules/Providers/API/...GetProvidersEndpoint.cs`, `docs/*`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/README.md``	Document geographic restriction in OpenAPI responses; update roadmap, sprint/checklist, skipped-tests analysis, and integration test docs.
Module renames & shared contracts \MeAjudaAi.sln`, `src/Shared/Contracts/Modules/Locations/`, `src/Shared/Contracts/Modules/SearchProviders/`, many `src/Modules/*``	Renamed Location→Locations and Search→SearchProviders across solution, contracts and tests; removed previous SubscriptionTier, added ESubscriptionTier and updated APIs/DTOs accordingly.
Test & build adjustments \src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.AppHost/Helpers/EnvironmentHelpers.cs`, `src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/MeAjudaAi.ApiService.csproj`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests.csproj`, `tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests.csproj``	Detect "Testing" environment via env vars, copy appsettings.Testing.json to output, add project references and WireMock package to integration tests.
Misc docs & renames \docs/`, small edits in `src/Aspire/``, many test namespaces	Documentation updates and pluralization/namespace fixes (Location→Locations, Search→SearchProviders) across docs and comments.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client as Client
    participant Middleware as GeographicRestrictionMiddleware
    participant Feature as FeatureManager
    participant Headers as HeaderExtractor
    participant IBGE as IGeographicValidationService
    participant Simple as SimpleValidation
    participant Next as NextMiddleware

    Client->>Middleware: HTTP request
    Middleware->>Feature: IsEnabled("GeographicRestriction")?
    alt feature disabled
        Middleware->>Next: forward request
    else feature enabled
        Middleware->>Headers: extract location (X-User-Location / X-User-City + X-User-State)
        alt location missing or malformed
            Note right of Middleware: fail-open — forward request
            Middleware->>Next: forward request
        else location present
            Middleware->>IBGE: ValidateCityAsync(city, state, allowed)
            alt IBGE returns true
                Middleware->>Next: forward request
            else IBGE returns false
                Middleware->>Simple: Validate against configured allowed lists
                alt allowed
                    Middleware->>Next: forward request
                else
                    Middleware-->>Client: 451 + GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse
                end
            else IBGE throws
                Note right of Middleware: fallback to SimpleValidation
                Middleware->>Simple: Validate against configured allowed lists
                alt allowed
                    Middleware->>Next: forward request
                else
                    Middleware-->>Client: 451 + GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse
                end
            end
        end
    end

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes

Areas to focus on:

• GeographicRestrictionMiddleware: header parsing precedence, normalization, fail-open vs fail-closed behavior, logging, and HTTP 451 payload shape.
• IbgeClient / IbgeService: HTTP error handling, deserialization, cache keys/TTL and HybridCache options, exception propagation.
• DI and feature-management registration across projects and test overrides (test vs production config).
• Public API/contract changes: namespace renames (Location→Locations, Search→SearchProviders) and enum migration (SubscriptionTier → ESubscriptionTier).
• Test infra: WireMockFixture stubs, integration test wiring, and conditional test skipping behavior.

Possibly related PRs

• refactor: rename Search module to SearchProviders #18 — Search → SearchProviders refactor: aligns with enum and namespace migration affecting shared contracts and module APIs.
• refactor: rename Location module to Locations #17 — Location → Locations rename: overlaps solution/project and namespace renames present here.
• refactor: rename Catalogs to ServiceCatalogs - Phase 1a (Domain + Inf… #19 — ServiceCatalogs additions/renames: touches related module-level code and may overlap project reorganizations.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through headers, flags, and tests tonight,
WireMock stitched the stubs so external calls behaved right.
IBGE taught the cities, cache kept answers light,
Middleware stands guard and returns a tidy 451.
Rabbit cheers — features, clients, and tests all take flight!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 25.58% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title 'Feature/geographic restriction' is directly related to the main changes, which implement geographic restriction middleware, configuration, services, and integration with IBGE APIs for location-based access control.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/geographic-restriction

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 12

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

1-2259: ⚠️ Swashbuckle 10.0.1 upgrade requires mandatory code changes—verify compatibility before merging.

Version 10.0 of Swashbuckle.AspNetCore introduces breaking changes due to upgrading Microsoft.OpenApi to version 2.x.x to add support for generating OpenAPI 3.1 documents.

Critical findings from verification:

1. EntityFrameworkCore 10.0.0-rc.2: RC 2 ships with a go-live support license, enabling production deployment while allowing developers to validate the platform ahead of its official release. Acceptable for near-release timelines (GA Nov 11, 2025).

2. Swashbuckle 10.0.1 breaking changes (high risk):

   • It is strongly recommended that you upgrade to Swashbuckle.AspNetCore v9.0.6 before upgrading to v10.
   • The Microsoft.OpenApi library underwent substantial API changes between versions 1.x and 2.x affecting how OpenAPI documents are constructed and manipulated, with non-nullable OpenApiDocument properties and OpenApiInfo.Version now required.
   • Custom OpenAPI filters and JWT security scheme configurations require refactoring (see recent GitHub issues #3651 with bearer token breaking changes).

Before merging, address these items:

1. Search codebase for Swagger/OpenAPI configuration code (particularly AddSecurityDefinition, custom filters, IOperationFilter, ISchemaFilter, IDocumentFilter).
2. Review and update any direct interactions with Microsoft.OpenAPI models per the migration guide, as the majority of breaking changes are due to underlying changes in Microsoft.OpenApi v2.0.0+.
3. Verify UseSwagger() calls do not rely on removed .WithOpenApi() support (use of Swashbuckle.AspNetCore with the ASP.NET Core WithOpenApi() method is no longer supported).

🧹 Nitpick comments (14)

docs/sprint-1-checklist.md (3)

445-445: Use Portuguese equivalents for repeated English terms in Portuguese text.

The document mixes English and Portuguese. Static analysis flags ~13 instances of English terms that should use Portuguese equivalents:

• packages (lines 445, 621) → use "pacotes" or "módulos"
• Target / Targets (lines 508, 515, 520, 538, 550, 559, 576, 584, 594, 603, 621) → use "Alvo" or "Objetivo"

Consider applying a consistent localization pass to improve readability for Portuguese-speaking team members.

Also applies to: 508-508, 515-515, 520-520, 538-538, 550-550, 559-559, 576-576, 584-584, 594-594, 603-603, 621-621

---

492-621: Assess realism of 10-day timeline and test coverage targets.

Days 8–10 planning targets ~165 new unit tests to achieve 70–80% coverage in parallel with Branches 1 & 2. This is ambitious given:

• Branch 1 requires 2 days + CR + merge
• Branch 2 requires 5 days + CR + merge
• Parallel test-coverage work risks overload or quality slips if prior branches have unexpected delays

Consider:

• Deferring test coverage expansion (Days 8–10) to Sprint 2 if Branches 1–2 encounter blockers
• Documenting an off-ramp or contingency plan if velocity falls short
• Setting milestone markers (e.g., "Branch 1 must merge by end of Day 2 to enable parallel coverage work")

---

13-19: Clarify the relationship between the 3-branch overview and coverage metrics.

The overview table (lines 13–19) does not list test coverage improvements per branch (Branch 1: ~1.31%, Branch 2: ~5%, Branch 3: ~47%). Adding a "Coverage Impact" column to the overview would help stakeholders quickly gauge cumulative progress and prioritize review efforts.

Also applies to: 435-445

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (3)

8-27: Skipped tests vs. Category filter documentation

The XML doc suggests running these via --filter "Category=Integration", but each test is also marked Skip, so they will remain skipped even when filtered. If you intend these to be runnable on demand, consider switching to a conditional pattern instead (e.g., ConditionalFact/ConditionalTheory checking an environment variable or custom trait) so the category filter alone is sufficient to include them.

---

115-176: Avoid brittle assertions on exact municipality counts from IBGE

For RJ and ES you assert exact counts (Be(92) / Be(78)), while for MG you already use a lower bound (BeGreaterThan(800)). Since IBGE can occasionally change municipality counts or boundaries, the exact-count assertions are likely to become flaky over time. It would be more robust to align with the MG approach (e.g., BeGreaterThan / BeInRange) plus spot-checking presence of key cities and UF sigla.

---

20-27: HttpClient lifetime is acceptable here but could be reused

Creating and disposing an HttpClient per test class is acceptable for infrequent, manual integration runs. If you ever promote these tests to run more often or in CI, consider reusing a static/shared HttpClient (or injecting via fixture) to avoid socket exhaustion and improve performance, keeping the same base address configuration.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests.csproj (1)

59-59: Review necessity of ApiService reference in unit test project.

Adding a reference from a unit test project to the ApiService bootstrapper is unusual. This can indicate:

1. Architectural concern: Unit tests (MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests) shouldn't need the bootstrapper. Consider if these are actually integration tests that belong in MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests instead.

2. Circular dependency risk: Verify this doesn't create circular dependencies in the build graph.

3. Test independence: Unit tests should test the Shared project in isolation without requiring the full application startup.

If tests need middleware configuration (like GeographicRestrictionMiddleware), consider:

• Moving these tests to the Integration.Tests project
• Extracting configuration logic into a testable helper
• Using the mock services directly without requiring ApiService

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for circular dependency risk and identify which tests use ApiService

# Check if ApiService references Shared (would create cycle)
echo "=== Checking if ApiService references Shared ==="
grep -A 5 "ProjectReference.*Shared" src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/MeAjudaAi.ApiService.csproj

# Find test files that might use ApiService types
echo -e "\n=== Finding tests that use ApiService ==="
rg "MeAjudaAi\.ApiService" tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/ --type cs -l

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (1)

113-121: Consider test isolation concerns with singleton mock service.

The MockGeographicValidationService is registered as a singleton, which could cause test pollution if multiple tests modify its state (using AllowCity/BlockCity methods). Since ApiTestBase creates individual test instances with IAsyncLifetime, consider:

1. Using Scoped lifetime instead of Singleton to ensure each test scope gets a fresh instance
2. Verifying the mock's Reset() method is called appropriately
3. Documenting that tests should not mutate the mock's allowed cities list

-                    // Registra mock com cidades piloto padrão
-                    services.AddSingleton<IGeographicValidationService, MockGeographicValidationService>();
+                    // Registra mock com cidades piloto padrão (Scoped para isolamento entre testes)
+                    services.AddScoped<IGeographicValidationService, MockGeographicValidationService>();

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests.csproj (1)

3-12: Be cautious suppressing NU1608 for the whole test project

Suppressing NU1608 at project level will hide all package‑downgrade warnings, not only the test‑specific one. Consider scoping this suppression to the specific PackageReference that triggers it or documenting which downgrade you’re explicitly accepting.

Please confirm which dependency is causing NU1608 and whether its downgrade is intentional before keeping this global suppression.

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (2)

3-18: Decouple interface documentation from the specific IBGE provider

The XML summary states that IBGE is used for normalization/validation, which hard‑codes a particular provider into the public contract’s docs. Consider rephrasing to something like “usa um provedor externo de dados geográficos (ex.: IBGE)” so the interface stays provider‑agnostic if the implementation changes.

---

15-22: Align allowedCities type with the “multiple enumeration” expectation

Since the doc explicitly mentions that allowedCities will be enumerated multiple times, you might consider changing the type to IReadOnlyCollection<string> (or IReadOnlyList<string>) to make the materialized‑collection requirement explicit at the API level and avoid accidental use of streaming enumerables.

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1)

11-31: GeographicRestrictionOptions implementation is good; two minor clarity nits

• The behavior for an empty AllowedStates is documented (validation ignored), but AllowedCities doesn’t say what an empty list means. Consider adding a similar remark so configuration semantics are unambiguous.
• This file relies on List<string>; if the project ever disables implicit usings, you’ll need an explicit using System.Collections.Generic; at the top.

Otherwise the defaults and documentation match the intended MVP pilot behavior.

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1)

1-127: Geographic restriction error model is expressive and fits the middleware use

The GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse plus UserLocation/AllowedCity give a clear, structured 451 payload (status/metadata, user location, allowed cities/states, and a stable error code), matching the described geographic restriction scenarios and middleware behavior.

If your global JSON options are not guaranteed to use camelCase, consider adding explicit [JsonPropertyName] attributes so the serialized field names (yourLocation, allowedCities, allowedStates, error) always match the documented example.

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (1)

298-327: Consider simplifying state name mapping logic.

The ternary chain at line 316 for determining state names could be refactored for better readability:

-Nome = ufSigla == "MG" ? "Minas Gerais" : ufSigla == "RJ" ? "Rio de Janeiro" : "Espírito Santo",
+Nome = ufSigla switch
+{
+    "MG" => "Minas Gerais",
+    "RJ" => "Rio de Janeiro",
+    "ES" => "Espírito Santo",
+    _ => ufSigla
+},

This improves readability and makes it easier to add more states if needed. However, given this is test helper code with limited scope, the current implementation is acceptable.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef32f12 and 9474cd9.

📒 Files selected for processing (76)

• Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
• MeAjudaAi.sln (4 hunks)
• docs/roadmap.md (11 hunks)
• docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md (1 hunks)
• docs/sprint-1-checklist.md (5 hunks)
• src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/Extensions.cs (3 hunks)
• src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults.csproj (1 hunks)
• src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Extensions/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/appsettings.json (1 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/packages.lock.json (5 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Regiao.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/UF.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (2 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IIbgeClient.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Tests/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/API/Endpoints/ProviderAdmin/GetProvidersEndpoint.cs (2 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Tests/packages.lock.json (29 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/MeAjudaAi.Shared.csproj (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/packages.lock.json (3 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ApiService.Tests/packages.lock.json (5 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Architecture.Tests/packages.lock.json (5 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests.csproj (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/packages.lock.json (6 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (2 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Documents/DocumentsApiTests.cs (4 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/packages.lock.json (6 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/packages.lock.json (26 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (25)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Extensions/TestCancellationExtensions.cs (1)

• CancellationToken (13-13)

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (2)

src/Shared/Models/ApiErrorResponse.cs (1)

• ApiErrorResponse (10-46)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (1)

• City (88-120)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IIbgeClient.cs (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (1)

• Municipio (298-327)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Extensions/TestCancellationExtensions.cs (1)

• CancellationToken (13-13)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IIbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (11-11)
• Task (12-12)
• Task (13-13)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• Municipio (9-34)
• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Shared/Serialization/SerializationDefaults.cs (1)

• SerializationDefaults (7-37)

src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/Extensions.cs (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/HealthCheckExtensions.cs (1)

• TBuilder (13-38)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (4)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (1)

• Municipio (186-215)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1)

• Microrregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/UF.cs (1)

• UF (9-22)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1)

• Mesorregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Providers/API/Endpoints/ProviderAdmin/GetProvidersEndpoint.cs (1)

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (2)

• GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse (35-85)
• GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse (74-84)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/UF.cs (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• UF (23-23)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Regiao.cs (1)

• Regiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• UF (23-23)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/UF.cs (1)

• UF (9-22)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (3)

• MockGeographicValidationService (9-82)
• MockGeographicValidationService (16-24)
• MockGeographicValidationService (29-32)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (18-22)
• Task (27-27)
• Task (32-32)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (20-58)
• Task (63-89)
• Task (94-113)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)
• Municipio (9-34)

src/Shared/Caching/HybridCacheService.cs (1)

• HybridCacheEntryOptions (155-162)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (6)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (2)

• Task (24-86)
• Task (122-166)

src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (18-22)
• Task (27-27)
• Task (32-32)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (18-22)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (38-54)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (20-58)
• Task (63-89)
• Task (94-113)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (13)

• Fact (34-52)
• Fact (54-72)
• Fact (74-92)
• Fact (94-110)
• Fact (112-130)
• Fact (132-150)
• Fact (152-168)
• Fact (174-197)
• Fact (199-216)
• Fact (218-232)
• Fact (238-259)
• Fact (261-275)
• Fact (277-292)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (3)

• Fact (11-24)
• Fact (26-47)
• Fact (49-61)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Architecture.Tests/ModuleApiArchitectureTests.cs (1)

• Assembly (312-318)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (3)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (2)

• Task (24-86)
• Task (122-166)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (15-44)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (18-22)

src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (1)

• Municipio (298-327)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• Municipio (9-34)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (1)

• Municipio (186-215)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Extensions/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs (2)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1)

• GeographicRestrictionOptions (11-31)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (1)

• GeographicRestrictionMiddleware (15-197)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (4)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (5)

• ApiTestBase (27-273)
• Task (164-194)
• Task (221-242)
• Task (247-263)
• Task (268-272)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (2)

• Task (24-86)
• Task (122-166)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (38-54)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (6)

• Theory (47-66)
• Theory (92-113)
• Theory (115-134)
• Theory (136-154)
• Theory (156-190)
• Theory (254-274)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (4)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (4)

• IbgeClient (14-142)
• Task (20-58)
• Task (63-89)
• Task (94-113)

src/Shared/Serialization/SerializationDefaults.cs (1)

• SerializationDefaults (7-37)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• Municipio (9-34)
• UF (23-23)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/UF.cs (1)

• UF (9-22)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (7)

src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/Extensions.cs (2)

• Extensions (20-243)
• Task (169-194)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1)

• GeographicRestrictionOptions (11-31)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (15-44)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (18-22)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (38-54)

src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs (1)

• FeatureFlags (7-32)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1)

• IbgeClient (14-142)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (1)

• IbgeService (14-130)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• GeographicValidationService (11-45)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1)

• Mesorregiao (9-19)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Documents/DocumentsApiTests.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (6)

• Fact (11-24)
• Fact (26-47)
• Fact (49-61)
• Fact (63-75)
• Fact (77-89)
• Fact (91-102)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (6)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (3)

• GeographicRestrictionMiddleware (15-197)
• Task (24-86)
• Task (122-166)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (15-44)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (18-22)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1)

• GeographicRestrictionOptions (11-31)

src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs (1)

• FeatureFlags (7-32)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (8)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1)

• IbgeClient (14-142)

src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (18-22)
• Task (27-27)
• Task (32-32)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (15-44)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1)

• Microrregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1)

• Mesorregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Regiao.cs (1)

• Regiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (4)

• IbgeService (14-130)
• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IIbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (11-11)
• Task (12-12)
• Task (13-13)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/sprint-1-checklist.md

[uncategorized] ~19-~19: Se é uma abreviatura, falta um ponto. Se for uma expressão, coloque entre aspas.
Context: ...: 10 dias úteis (expandido para incluir test coverage) --- ## 🗓️ Branch 1: `featu...

(ABREVIATIONS_PUNCTUATION)

---

[uncategorized] ~438-~438: Se é uma abreviatura, falta um ponto. Se for uma expressão, coloque entre aspas.
Context: ...auth + infra) | 2 (infra only) | dotnet test output | | Code Coverage | **28.69%...

(ABREVIATIONS_PUNCTUATION)

---

[locale-violation] ~445-~445: “packages” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “embalagens” ou “pacotes”.
Context: ...s migration (novos arquivos sem testes: packages.lock.json, generated code). --- ## 🚨...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_PACKAGES)

---

[locale-violation] ~508-~508: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...tos brasileiros, DDDs válidos - [ ] Target: 20 testes → +3% coverage #### After...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~515-~515: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...ts`: GetDescription, GetValue - [ ] Target: 15 testes → +2% coverage - [ ] **Un...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~520-~520: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...alidation, NotFound, Conflict - [ ] Target: 12 testes → +2% coverage **Coverage...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~538-~538: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...iço inexistente lança exceção - [ ] Target: 18 testes → +8% coverage #### After...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~550-~550: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...tivate/Deactivate muda status - [ ] Target: 15 testes → +6% coverage - [ ] **Se...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~559-~559: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...moveService valida existência - [ ] Target: 12 testes → +5% coverage **Coverage...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~576-~576: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...dAsync é chamado corretamente - [ ] Target: 10 testes → +5% coverage - [ ] **Up...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~584-~584: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ... inexistente retorna NotFound - [ ] Target: 8 testes → +4% coverage #### Aftern...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~594-~594: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...binados (rating + serviceIds) - [ ] Target: 12 testes → +5% coverage - [ ] **Cr...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~603-~603: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...oak integration mock funciona - [ ] Target: 10 testes → +4% coverage **Coverage...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~621-~621: “Targets” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivos” ou “alvos”.
Context: ...1%** | ~165 unit tests | Nota: Targets ajustados considerando que packages.loc...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGETS)

---

[locale-violation] ~621-~621: “packages” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “embalagens” ou “pacotes”.
Context: ...a**: Targets ajustados considerando que packages.lock.json (não testável) está inflando ...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_PACKAGES)

docs/roadmap.md

[locale-violation] ~10-~10: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ... Sprint 0 ✅ | Sprint 1 🔄 (Dia 1) | MVP Target: 31/Março/2025 *Cobertura de Testes...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Pontuação duplicada
Context: ...69% → Meta 75-80% (Sprint 1) Stack: .NET 10 LTS + Aspire 13 + PostgreSQL + Bl...

(DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION_XML)

---

[inconsistency] ~65-~65: Nesta situação o mês é redundante.
Context: ...🔄 DIA 1 | | Sprint 2 | 2 semanas | 3 Dez - 16 Dez | Blazor Admin Portal (Web) | ⏳ Planeja...

(MONTH_REDUNDANCY)

---

[uncategorized] ~92-~92: Se é uma abreviatura, falta um ponto. Se for uma expressão, coloque entre aspas.
Context: ...o de serviços Conquistas: - 28.69% test coverage (93/100 E2E passing, 296 unit ...

(ABREVIATIONS_PUNCTUATION)

---

[locale-violation] ~93-~93: “packages” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “embalagens” ou “pacotes”.
Context: ...sts) - ⚠️ Coverage caiu após migration (packages.lock.json + generated code) - APIs públ...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_PACKAGES)

---

[grammar] ~94-~94: Se ‘módulos’ é um substantivo, ‘todos’ no plural exige um segundo artigo.
Context: ...úblicas (IModuleApi) implementadas para todos módulos - Integration events funcionais entre m...

(TODOS_FOLLOWED_BY_NOUN_PLURAL)

---

[uncategorized] ~319-~319: Pontuação duplicada
Context: ...optional improvement). Modelos IBGE: - Regiao: Norte, Nordeste, Sudeste, Sul, Centro-O...

(DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION_XML)

---

[typographical] ~757-~757: Símbolo sem par: “]” aparentemente está ausente
Context: ...raphic-restriction` Documentação: [docs/sprint-1-checklist.md](./sprint-1-c...

(UNPAIRED_BRACKETS)

---

[locale-violation] ~761-~761: “packages” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “embalagens” ou “pacotes”.
Context: ...v) - ⚠️ Coverage caiu: 40.51% → 28.69% (packages.lock.json + generated code) - 🎯 Meta S...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_PACKAGES)

---

[grammar] ~765-~765: Se ‘módulos’ é um substantivo, ‘todos’ no plural exige um segundo artigo.
Context: ...*: Interfaces IModuleApi definidas para todos módulos - ✅ Cache de Cidades: Implementar c...

(TODOS_FOLLOWED_BY_NOUN_PLURAL)

---

[locale-violation] ~766-~766: “performance” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “desempenho”, “atuação”, “apresentação”, “espetáculo” ou “interpretação”.
Context: ...ta AllowedCities para evitar impacto de performance - ✅ Background Workers: Arquitetura...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_PERFORMANCE)

---

[typographical] ~768-~768: Símbolo sem par: “]” aparentemente está ausente
Context: ...8 E2E Tests Skipped*: Documentados em [skipped-tests-tracker.md](./skipped-test...

(UNPAIRED_BRACKETS)

---

[locale-violation] ~793-~793: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...r geographic validation (520069a) ✅ - Target: 28.69% → 30% coverage (ATUAL: 44 tes...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~802-~802: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ...Dia 7**: Documentação + Code review - Target: 30% → 35% coverage, 93/100 → 98/100 ...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~808-~808: “Target” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “objetivo” ou “alvo”.
Context: ... + Update + Search) → +18% coverage - Target: 35% → 75-80% coverage (+165 unit tes...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_TARGET)

---

[locale-violation] ~1167-~1167: “server” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “servidor”.
Context: ... Cidade deve existir no IBGE (validação server-side) - Não permitir duplicatas (ci...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_SERVER)

---

[locale-violation] ~1236-~1236: “performance” é um estrangeirismo. É preferível dizer “desempenho”, “atuação”, “apresentação”, “espetáculo” ou “interpretação”.
Context: ...rvice`) - TTL: 5 minutos (balanço entre performance e fresh data) - Invalidação: Ao adicion...

(PT_BARBARISMS_REPLACE_PERFORMANCE)

docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md

[uncategorized] ~111-~111: Esta conjunção deve ser separada por vírgulas e só deve ser utilizada no início duma frase para efeitos de estilo.
Context: ...re containers) - Testcontainers.Azurite existe mas não está configurado Solução: 1. A...

(VERB_COMMA_CONJUNCTION)

---

[uncategorized] ~119-~119: Esta conjunção deve ser separada por vírgulas e só deve ser utilizada no início duma frase para efeitos de estilo.
Context: ...Service Prioridade: 🟡 MÉDIA - E2E importante mas não crítico para Sprint 1 --- ## 5. H...

(VERB_COMMA_CONJUNCTION)

---

[uncategorized] ~151-~151: Esta conjunção deve ser separada por vírgulas e só deve ser utilizada no início duma frase para efeitos de estilo.
Context: ... com Aspire Prioridade: 🟡 MÉDIA - Importante mas requer refactoring significativo --- ...

(VERB_COMMA_CONJUNCTION)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

docs/roadmap.md

1094-1094: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

1110-1110: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

---

1188-1188: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

---

1230-1230: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md

5-5: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: code-analysis

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (1)

155-177: Wildcard in ResideInNamespace means domain entity naming rule never runs

Domain_Entities_Should_Have_Proper_Naming uses:

.ResideInNamespace("MeAjudaAi.Modules.*.Domain.Entities")

Like in the earlier version of these tests, ResideInNamespace does not interpret * as a wildcard — it expects a real namespace. As written, this selector will match nothing and the rule will always pass, even if you introduce *Dto or *ViewModel types into Domain.

You already fixed this pattern elsewhere with ResideInNamespaceMatching(...). I suggest applying the same here, e.g.:

-    var result = domainAssemblies
-        .That()
-        .ResideInNamespace("MeAjudaAi.Modules.*.Domain.Entities")
+    var result = domainAssemblies
+        .That()
+        .ResideInNamespaceMatching(@"^MeAjudaAi\.Modules\..*\.Domain\.Entities($|\.)")
         .And()
         .AreClasses()
         .Should()
         .NotHaveNameMatching(".*Dto$")
         .And()
         .NotHaveNameMatching(".*ViewModel$")
         .GetResult();

Does `ResideInNamespace` in NetArchTest.Rules support `*` wildcards, or should `ResideInNamespaceMatching` be used for pattern/regex-based namespace filters?

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/appsettings.json (1)

107-129: Locations external APIs and geographic feature flag config look consistent

• ViaCep, BrasilApi and OpenCep BaseUrl values are now domain‑only, which resolves the earlier duplicated path segment problem in the HTTP clients.
• New IBGE.BaseUrl points at the localidades API root and should work well for composing municipality/UF routes.
• FeatureManagement.GeographicRestriction is now defined here and matches the shared flag name and Providers module config.

Please re‑run your minimal API/integration tests that hit these CEP/IBGE paths to confirm there are no lingering URL construction issues after the BaseUrl changes.

docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md (1)

120-120: Add comma before “mas” for correct PT-BR punctuation.

Insert a comma before “mas” in line 120:

-**Prioridade:** 🟡 MÉDIA - E2E importante mas não crítico para Sprint 1
+**Prioridade:** 🟡 MÉDIA - E2E importante, mas não crítico para Sprint 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (9)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (2)

117-153: Middleware dependency test only checks constructor injection

The GeographicRestrictionMiddleware_Should_Not_Depend_On_Locations_Infrastructure test inspects only constructor parameter types to infer dependencies. It will miss violations where the middleware:

• Uses service locator / IServiceProvider to resolve Locations.Infrastructure types, or
• References Locations.Infrastructure types in method bodies, fields, or properties.

If you want this test to be a stronger architectural guardrail, consider extending it to also inspect:

• Fields and properties on middlewareType whose types live in MeAjudaAi.Modules.Locations.Infrastructure, and
• Possibly method bodies (via NetArchTest or Roslyn) for direct type references.

As-is, it’s still useful but weaker than the test name suggests.

---

200-226: Assembly discovery helper can hard‑fail when pattern matches nothing

GetAssembliesMatchingPattern is used with patterns like "MeAjudaAi.Modules.Locations.Infrastructure.dll" and then immediately consumed via .First() in Locations_Module_Should_Not_Create_Circular_Dependencies. If the assembly isn’t present in the test bin output, this will throw rather than failing with a clear architecture assertion.

Consider either:

• Using FirstOrDefault() and throwing a custom InvalidOperationException with a helpful message (like you do for the ApiService assembly), or
• Asserting in the test that at least one assembly was found before proceeding.

Not critical, but improves diagnosability when the test project configuration changes.

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

11-44: Clarify error‑handling semantics vs middleware fallback

GeographicValidationService.ValidateCityAsync wraps IIbgeService.ValidateCityInAllowedRegionsAsync in a try/catch and returns false on any exception, while IbgeService itself already catches and fail‑closes on IBGE errors. At the same time, GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.IsLocationAllowedAsync has a try/catch around geographicValidationService.ValidateCityAsync and intends to fall back to simple validation on exception.

With this layering:

• IBGE/network errors are already caught in IbgeService and converted to false.
• The adapter’s extra try/catch means the middleware’s fallback path on exception will basically never be hit.
• The net effect is “fail‑closed” for IBGE issues (block access), not “fallback to simple validation”.

If this strict behavior is intentional, you can remove the outer try/catch here (and rely on IIbgeService’s policy) to simplify the adapter. If you instead want the middleware’s “fallback to simple validation on IBGE error” to be effective, you’ll need a way for genuine IBGE failures to surface (e.g. by letting IIbgeService throw or returning a tri‑state result).

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

2106-2106: Be aware of the new MeAjudaAi.ApiService dependency in Shared tests.

Adding MeAjudaAi.ApiService as a dependency of MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests is reasonable for end‑to‑end style shared tests, but it does create a stronger coupling from shared test utilities back to the API host. If this starts to slow test runs or complicate layering, consider moving API-specific scenarios into a dedicated API test project instead.

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1)

18-66: Harden IBGE client input handling and align comparison comment with behavior.

Two small robustness/documentation points here:

• GetMunicipioByNameAsync assumes cityName is non‑null/non‑empty. If callers ever pass null/whitespace you’ll hit Uri.EscapeDataString with invalid input. Consider an early guard (e.g., log and return null when string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(cityName)).
• The comment says the match is “diacritic‑insensitive”, but the code uses StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase, which is case‑insensitive only. Either update the comment to avoid mentioning diacritics or introduce a helper that normalizes/removes accents before comparison.

ValidateCityInStateAsync looks correct and nicely fail‑closed on errors once these minor points are addressed.

Also applies to: 102-121

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1)

37-90: GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse model looks solid; consider small constructor/docs tweaks

The shape and defaults (451 status, RFC 7725 semantics, error = "geographic_restriction") look good and align with the middleware/error use cases.

Two minor improvements you might consider:

• Add an optional IEnumerable<string>? allowedStates = null parameter to the ctor and assign AllowedStates = allowedStates; so callers can fully populate the payload in one place (mirroring allowedCities).
• Update the XML example JSON to also include allowedStates so the docs match the current public surface.

These are ergonomics/consistency nits only; the implementation is otherwise clean.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (1)

32-541: Comprehensive test coverage for GeographicRestrictionMiddleware

This suite does a good job exercising the main behaviors: feature-flag gating, internal endpoint bypass, header precedence and parsing, fail‑open when location is unknown, block path including JSON payload shape, logging, and IBGE integration (success, failure, null service, case-insensitive, missing state).

If you ever want to extend it, an extra scenario where IBGE and simple validation disagree (e.g., IBGE denies while simple allows) could be useful to document the precedence semantics, but that’s purely optional. As‑is, this is strong coverage.

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (1)

19-129: IbgeService behavior and caching look correct; only minor polish opportunities

The core behavior looks right: you resolve the município via IBGE with caching, enforce optional UF matching, then check the normalized city name against allowedCities, with clear logging and a fail‑closed stance on errors.

Two small, non-blocking nits you might consider:

• In both GetCityDetailsAsync and GetMunicipiosByUFAsync, you pass expiration: TimeSpan.FromDays(7) and also set Expiration = TimeSpan.FromDays(7) in HybridCacheEntryOptions. If ICacheService already uses HybridCacheEntryOptions.Expiration, you could drop the separate expiration parameter to avoid duplication and keep a single source of truth.
• Before building cache keys and tags, you could defensively Trim() the cityName/ufSigla to avoid subtle key fragmentation from incidental whitespace.

Functionally this is solid as-is; these are just small clarity/robustness tweaks.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (1)

20-27: Consider externalizing the IBGE API base URL and adding timeout configuration.

The base URL is currently hardcoded. Consider using a configuration file or environment variable to make the tests more flexible across different environments. Additionally, the HttpClient lacks a timeout configuration, which could cause tests to hang indefinitely if the IBGE API becomes unresponsive.

Apply this pattern:

 public IbgeApiIntegrationTests()
 {
+    var baseUrl = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("IBGE_API_BASE_URL") 
+        ?? "https://servicodados.ibge.gov.br/api/v1/localidades/";
     _httpClient = new HttpClient
     {
-        BaseAddress = new Uri("https://servicodados.ibge.gov.br/api/v1/localidades/")
+        BaseAddress = new Uri(baseUrl),
+        Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)
     };
     _client = new IbgeClient(_httpClient, NullLogger<IbgeClient>.Instance);
 }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9474cd9 and 8123faa.

📒 Files selected for processing (59)

• Directory.Packages.props (1 hunks)
• docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md (1 hunks)
• src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.AppHost/appsettings.json (1 hunks)
• src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/appsettings.json (1 hunks)
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/packages.lock.json (5 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Documents/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Tests/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/API/Endpoints/ProviderAdmin/GetProvidersEndpoint.cs (2 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Infrastructure/appsettings.json (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Providers/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Tests/packages.lock.json (29 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/API/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Application/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Domain/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (4 hunks)
• src/Modules/Users/Tests/packages.lock.json (28 hunks)
• src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/packages.lock.json (3 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ApiService.Tests/packages.lock.json (5 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Architecture.Tests/packages.lock.json (5 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/packages.lock.json (6 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (2 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/packages.lock.json (6 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/packages.lock.json (26 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (16)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Providers/Domain/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Users/Domain/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Locations/Domain/packages.lock.json
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Providers/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Documents/Application/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs
• src/Modules/SearchProviders/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json
• src/Modules/Locations/Application/packages.lock.json
• src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.ServiceDefaults/packages.lock.json
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ApiService.Tests/packages.lock.json
• src/Shared/packages.lock.json
• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (11)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (18-22)
• Task (27-27)
• Task (32-32)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (18-66)
• Task (71-97)
• Task (102-121)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)
• Municipio (9-34)

src/Shared/Caching/HybridCacheService.cs (1)

• HybridCacheEntryOptions (155-162)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (4)

• IbgeClient (12-122)
• Task (18-66)
• Task (71-97)
• Task (102-121)

src/Shared/Serialization/SerializationDefaults.cs (1)

• SerializationDefaults (7-37)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• Municipio (9-34)
• UF (23-23)

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (6)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (4)

• IbgeService (14-130)
• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (18-66)
• Task (71-97)
• Task (102-121)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1)

• Microrregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1)

• Mesorregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Regiao.cs (1)

• Regiao (9-19)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (7)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (1)

• GeographicRestrictionMiddleware (15-197)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (15-44)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (19-23)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (38-54)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Options/GeographicRestrictionOptions.cs (1)

• GeographicRestrictionOptions (11-32)

src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs (1)

• FeatureFlags (7-14)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Extensions/TestCancellationExtensions.cs (1)

• CancellationToken (13-13)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (3)

• Fact (11-24)
• Fact (26-47)
• Fact (49-61)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Architecture.Tests/ModuleApiArchitectureTests.cs (1)

• Assembly (312-318)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (6)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1)

• IbgeClient (12-122)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1)

• Microrregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1)

• Mesorregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Regiao.cs (1)

• Regiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Providers/API/Endpoints/ProviderAdmin/GetProvidersEndpoint.cs (1)

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (2)

• GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse (37-91)
• GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse (80-90)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IIbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (11-11)
• Task (12-12)
• Task (13-13)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• Municipio (9-34)
• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Shared/Serialization/SerializationDefaults.cs (1)

• SerializationDefaults (7-37)

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (2)

src/Shared/Models/ApiErrorResponse.cs (1)

• ApiErrorResponse (10-46)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (1)

• City (88-120)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Application/Services/IIbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (18-22)
• Task (27-27)
• Task (32-32)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• Task (19-23)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (2)

• Task (24-86)
• Task (122-166)

🪛 LanguageTool

docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md

[uncategorized] ~120-~120: Esta conjunção deve ser separada por vírgulas e só deve ser utilizada no início duma frase para efeitos de estilo.
Context: ...Service Prioridade: 🟡 MÉDIA - E2E importante mas não crítico para Sprint 1 --- ## 5. H...

(VERB_COMMA_CONJUNCTION)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: code-analysis
• GitHub Check: build-and-test

🔇 Additional comments (40)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

721-725: Lock file changes align with Feature Management addition.

The lock file correctly reflects the addition of Microsoft Feature Management (v4.3.0) and Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore (v4.3.0) across the project dependencies. Version constraints are consistent throughout:

• Microsoft.FeatureManagement: 4.3.0 (transitive in E2E tests, central transitive in package references)
• Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore: 4.3.0 (as a dependency in ServiceDefaults and Shared)
• Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider: 8.0.1 (transitive dependency of FeatureManagement)

All versions are compatible, and the dependency graph is properly propagated. Since lock files are auto-generated, no manual adjustments are needed—this reflects correct restoration of the updated project files.

Also applies to: 1078-1089, 1945-1945, 1972-1972, 2842-2850

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

124-128: Feature Management dependencies added appropriately for geographic restriction feature flags.

The additions of Microsoft.FeatureManagement (v4.3.0) and Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore (v4.3.0), along with their transitive dependencies, align with the PR objective of implementing geographic restriction middleware with optional feature flagging.

Since this is an auto-generated lock file, please verify the following:

• Ensure corresponding package declarations exist in the test project's .csproj file and in the shared project's .csproj file (where line 633 adds the AspNetCore package reference).
• Confirm that the transitive dependency versions (e.g., Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory 8.0.1 at line 251) do not introduce conflicts with other resolved versions in the dependency graph (e.g., line 220–230 resolves to 10.0.0).

You can verify this by checking the .csproj files and ensuring the lock file was regenerated correctly via dotnet restore.

Also applies to: 245-256, 633-633, 983-991

src/Modules/SearchProviders/Tests/packages.lock.json (4)

617-628: Feature Management integration aligns with PR objectives.

Microsoft.FeatureManagement (4.3.0) and Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore (4.3.0) have been properly resolved with compatible transitive dependencies. The package's reliance on older Microsoft.Extensions versions (8.0.x) is compatible with the 10.0.0 versions used throughout the rest of the solution.

Also applies to: 1977-1984

---

813-849: OpenTelemetry and observability additions are well-integrated.

The new OpenTelemetry packages (core 1.14.0, exporters/instrumentations 1.14.0) and Azure Monitor integration (1.4.0-1.5.0) represent a comprehensive observability foundation. All versions are consistent and current.

Also applies to: 1534-1545, 2013-2080

---

126-134: Infrastructure and resilience packages appropriately added.

Health checks (AspNetCore.HealthChecks.NpgSql 9.0.0), resilience patterns (Microsoft.Extensions.Resilience 10.0.0, Polly 8.4.2), and Aspire integration (13.0.0) support robust operational characteristics. These align well with the geographic restriction middleware requirements.

Also applies to: 1493-1512, 581-593, 855-878

---

1-10: Lockfile format and structure are correct.

This is a generated NuGet lockfile documenting the resolved dependency tree. The file should be committed as-is; manual edits are not recommended. The extensive additions reflect the dependency cascade from integrating Microsoft.FeatureManagement (4.3.0) and related observability/infrastructure packages.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Architecture.Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

163-167: Auto-generated lock file update for Feature Management integration—no security concerns identified.

This lock file reflects the addition of Microsoft.FeatureManagement (v4.3.0) and its transitive dependency Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider (v8.0.1) to support the geographic restriction feature. No known security vulnerabilities exist for either package version.

src/Aspire/MeAjudaAi.AppHost/appsettings.json (1)

17-20: Feature flag wiring in AppHost config looks good

FeatureManagement.GeographicRestriction is added correctly at the root, JSON stays valid, and defaulting to false is a safe opt‑in default as you roll this out.

Directory.Packages.props (1)

124-125: Central package entry for Feature Management is consistent

Adding Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 to central package management matches the new feature flag usage and follows the existing structure.

Please ensure dotnet restore/dotnet test are run so NuGet validates this version against the rest of the 10.0.0 stack.

src/Modules/SearchProviders/Domain/packages.lock.json (1)

74-78: Lockfile updates correctly reflect new Feature Management dependencies

The new entries for Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider, Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0, and the central‑transitive Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 (including the meajudaai.shared project deps) are internally consistent and match the central package declaration.

Given these are generated artifacts, just confirm they were produced by a fresh dotnet restore on the updated SDK so there’s no manual drift.

Also applies to: 190-201, 461-461, 811-819

src/Modules/SearchProviders/API/packages.lock.json (1)

95-99: SearchProviders API lockfile aligns with Feature Management rollout

The added Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider, Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0, and Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 entries (including meajudaai.shared deps) look coherent with the central package configuration and other modules.

Please regenerate this lockfile via dotnet restore in CI to ensure it matches the actual resolved graph across all TFM targets.

Also applies to: 179-186, 466-466, 671-679

src/Modules/Users/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (1)

141-145: Users infrastructure lockfile correctly picks up Feature Management

The new transitive Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider and Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0 entries plus the central‑transitive Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 and the meajudaai.shared dependency entry are consistent with the rest of the solution.

As with other lockfiles, just verify this was produced by the same restore run after updating Directory.Packages.props, to avoid mixed resolver state.

Also applies to: 257-268, 566-566, 870-878

src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/API/packages.lock.json (1)

118-122: ServiceCatalogs API lockfile Feature Management entries look correct

The additions for Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider, Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0, and central Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 (plus the meajudaai.shared dependency) match the pattern used in other modules and the central package config.

Confirm this lockfile is fully regenerated (rather than hand‑edited) so that all dependency hashes and versions stay in sync across projects.

Also applies to: 234-245, 527-527, 861-869

src/Modules/SearchProviders/Application/packages.lock.json (1)

74-78: SearchProviders application lockfile is consistent with shared Feature Management

The new transitive Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider and Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0 entries, plus Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 in both the meajudaai.shared section and central‑transitive block, are coherent with the rest of the solution and central versioning.

Please keep this file generated via tooling and validate with dotnet restore/CI to catch any subtle resolver issues early.

Also applies to: 190-201, 467-467, 817-825

src/Modules/Providers/API/packages.lock.json (1)

118-122: Providers API lockfile Feature Management propagation looks good

The added Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider, Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0, and Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 entries, including the meajudaai.shared dependency and central‑transitive block, align with other modules and the central package declaration.

Same as other modules: rely on automated regeneration and CI restore/tests to validate these dependency graph updates end‑to‑end.

Also applies to: 234-245, 527-527, 861-869

src/Modules/Documents/Domain/packages.lock.json (1)

74-78: Lockfile changes appear tooling-generated

These entries look like standard NuGet lockfile updates (Feature Management + transitive deps). I’m treating them as tooling output and not doing deeper manual review here.

Also applies to: 190-201, 461-461

src/Modules/Users/API/packages.lock.json (1)

118-122: Lockfile changes treated as generated output

This diff is confined to dependency resolution metadata (Feature Management + related transitive packages). Assuming this lockfile was produced by dotnet restore, I’m not reviewing these entries in detail.

Also applies to: 234-245, 555-555, 889-897

src/Modules/Users/Application/packages.lock.json (1)

74-78: NuGet lock metadata only

These changes are to the packages.lock graph (FeatureManagement + TimeProvider). Treating as auto-generated, no manual dependency audit here.

Also applies to: 190-201, 467-467, 817-825

src/Modules/Documents/API/packages.lock.json (1)

104-108: Lockfile dependency graph updates only

This is purely lockfile metadata for new Feature Management-related packages. Assuming it’s produced by restore, I’m not doing a deep manual pass here.

Also applies to: 188-195, 458-458, 682-690

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/IbgeClientTests.cs (1)

34-54: No changes needed—the test assertion is correct

Uri.ToString() returns a decoded representation and unescapes percent-encoded sequences in query strings. Your test code already accounts for this with the comment "A query string estará decodificada na URI," and the assertion uriString.Should().Contain(input) will correctly pass because _mockHandler.LastRequestUri.ToString() will return the decoded query parameter value.

The suggested fix (changing to Uri.EscapeDataString(input)) would actually break the assertion by comparing an encoded value against a decoded URI representation.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

src/Modules/Documents/Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

1-2262: Lockfile changes appear tool‑generated and consistent

This packages.lock.json looks like a standard NuGet restore output reflecting new projects and supporting libraries; I don’t see anything that needs manual adjustment here.

src/Modules/Providers/Infrastructure/appsettings.json (1)

4-7: Feature flag configuration is wired correctly here

Adding FeatureManagement.GeographicRestriction with a boolean matches the shared flag name and keeps this module’s config aligned with the API service.

Please just confirm environment‑specific appsettings (e.g., appsettings.Development.json, deployment config) also define this flag as intended so behavior is consistent across environments.

src/Shared/Constants/FeatureFlags.cs (1)

1-14: Centralized feature flag constant is clear and correct

The FeatureFlags.GeographicRestriction constant is well‑named, documented, and matches the configuration key, which should prevent string‑literal drift across the codebase.

src/Modules/Providers/Application/packages.lock.json (1)

1-984: Lockfile updates align with new shared dependencies

This packages.lock.json reflects the expected dependency graph after adding shared/feature‑flag infrastructure; nothing stands out as manually tweaked or problematic.

src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Domain/packages.lock.json (1)

1-978: ServiceCatalogs domain lockfile changes look auto‑generated

The new entries (including feature‑flag stack and shared infra) appear to be standard NuGet restore output; I don’t see any risk or need for manual edits here.

src/Modules/Documents/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (1)

1-1035: Documents infrastructure lockfile matches the new shared feature stack

The additional entries for feature management and related infrastructure look consistent with the rest of the solution’s lockfiles and with central package management; no issues from a code-review standpoint.

src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (1)

107-111: Feature management dependency wiring looks consistent; just confirm lockfile is generated, not hand-edited.

The addition of Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider, Microsoft.FeatureManagement 4.3.0, and Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 here matches the rest of the solution and the new geographic restriction feature. Please just ensure these entries came from updating the project/package references and running dotnet restore, not from manual lockfile edits, so future restores remain stable.

Also applies to: 223-233, 507-507, 835-843

src/Shared/Geolocation/IGeographicValidationService.cs (1)

1-24: Interface design and documentation look solid and aligned with usage.

The async signature, use of IReadOnlyCollection<string> for allowedCities, and XML documentation all line up well with the IBGE-backed validation flow in IbgeService and the middleware expectations.

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/packages.lock.json (1)

74-78: Locations module lockfile updates for FeatureManagement are coherent.

The new Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider and Microsoft.FeatureManagement/Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 entries match the shared and integration-test graphs and are appropriate for the geographic restriction feature. As with other lockfiles, just ensure these changes were produced by dotnet restore after updating project references, not by manual edits.

Also applies to: 190-201, 474-474, 824-832

src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Application/packages.lock.json (1)

74-78: ServiceCatalogs application lockfile is aligned with shared FeatureManagement setup.

The addition of Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider plus Microsoft.FeatureManagement / Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 mirrors the rest of the solution and supports consistent feature-flag use. Please just confirm this lockfile was regenerated via the normal build/restore flow so hashes and transitive graphs stay trustworthy.

Also applies to: 190-201, 467-467, 817-825

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

759-763: FeatureManagement 4.3.0 propagation into integration tests looks correct.

Microsoft.Bcl.TimeProvider plus Microsoft.FeatureManagement / Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore 4.3.0 are now consistently present in the test dependency graph and match the application/Shared projects, which is what you want for exercising the geographic restriction feature under tests.

Also applies to: 1138-1148, 2053-2053, 2080-2080, 2939-2947

src/Modules/ServiceCatalogs/Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

1-2262: Treat this lockfile as tooling-generated

Given this is a packages.lock.json produced by the tooling, it looks consistent with the broader solution changes (new shared projects and infra libraries). Assuming it was regenerated via the usual dotnet tooling rather than hand-edited, there’s nothing to adjust here from a code perspective.

src/Modules/Providers/Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

1-2262: Lockfile updates align with shared infra; assuming tool-generated

This packages.lock.json reflects the expanded shared/test graph (ApiService, Locations, Shared, ServiceDefaults, Feature Management, telemetry, etc.). As long as it was regenerated by dotnet tooling and not manually edited, there’s nothing here that needs code review changes.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

1-2229: LGTM! Package lock file correctly updated with Feature Management dependencies.

The lock file has been properly updated to include Microsoft.FeatureManagement (4.3.0), Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore (4.3.0), and their transitive dependencies. These changes align with the PR's geographic restriction feature implementation.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (1)

34-58: Verify hardcoded IBGE city IDs remain stable over time.

The test relies on specific IBGE city IDs (e.g., 3129707 for Muriaé-MG). While these IDs are typically stable, IBGE may update them in rare cases during administrative reorganizations or corrections.

Consider documenting the source and date of these IDs in comments, or periodically verify them against the live IBGE API to ensure the tests remain valid.

 [Fact(Skip = "Real API call - run manually or in integration test suite")]
 public async Task GetMunicipioByNameAsync_Muriae_ShouldReturnValidMunicipio()
 {
     // Arrange
     const string cityName = "Muriaé";
+    // IBGE city ID verified as of 2025-11: https://servicodados.ibge.gov.br/api/v1/localidades/municipios/3129707
 
     // Act
     var result = await _client.GetMunicipioByNameAsync(cityName);

src/Modules/Locations/Tests/Unit/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeServiceTests.cs (4)

24-30: LGTM! Excellent test setup with strict mocking.

Using MockBehavior.Strict ensures that all mock interactions are explicitly defined, which helps catch unintended calls and makes tests more reliable. The constructor properly initializes all required mocks for the System Under Test (SUT).

---

152-168: Good fail-closed behavior for exception handling.

The test correctly verifies that when the IBGE client throws an exception, the service returns false rather than throwing. This fail-closed approach is appropriate for security-sensitive validation logic, as it prevents access when the validation service is unavailable.

---

298-339: Well-structured helper method for test data creation.

The CreateMunicipio helper method properly constructs the complete geographic hierarchy (Município → Microrregião → Mesorregião → UF → Região) required by the IBGE data model. The switch expressions provide clear mapping for supported states (MG, RJ, ES) and throw meaningful exceptions for unsupported values.

---

355-386: Complex but necessary mock setup for cache behavior.

The SetupCacheGetOrCreate method correctly simulates cache-miss scenarios by invoking the factory function. The dual setup for both the cache service and IBGE client ensures proper interaction verification. While complex, this approach is appropriate given the service's caching logic.

src/Modules/Users/Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

1-2262: LGTM! Package lock file correctly updated with Feature Management dependencies.

The lock file has been properly updated to include Microsoft.FeatureManagement (4.3.0), Microsoft.FeatureManagement.AspNetCore (4.3.0), and their transitive dependencies, maintaining consistency with other test projects in the solution.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 5

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1)

53-55: Same IBGE code inconsistency in this example.

The same incorrect IBGE codes appear in this property's XML documentation example. Please ensure consistency with the actual IBGE codes after verifying them.

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (2)

152-161: Consider more specific exception handling

The empty catch block swallows all exceptions when loading assemblies. While the intent (skip unloadable assemblies) is clear from the comment, consider catching specific exceptions like BadImageFormatException, FileLoadException, or FileNotFoundException to avoid masking unexpected errors.

-            catch
+            catch (Exception ex) when (
+                ex is BadImageFormatException or 
+                FileLoadException or 
+                FileNotFoundException)
             {
                 // Skip assemblies that can't be loaded
                 continue;
             }

---

174-178: Consider making the module list discoverable

The hardcoded module list requires manual updates when new modules are added. While acceptable for architecture tests that enforce explicit design decisions, you could make it more maintainable by dynamically discovering modules from loaded assemblies (similar to the approach in ModuleApiArchitectureTests.cs shown in relevant snippets).

Example approach:

private static List<string> GetModuleNamespaces(string layer)
{
    var assemblies = GetAssembliesMatchingPattern($"MeAjudaAi.Modules.*.{layer}.dll");
    return assemblies
        .Select(a => a.GetTypes().FirstOrDefault()?.Namespace)
        .Where(ns => ns != null)
        .Distinct()
        .ToList()!;
}

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1)

80-90: Consider adding allowedStates parameter to constructor.

The AllowedStates property (line 65) is declared but not set in the constructor. If this property is intended to be populated alongside AllowedCities, consider adding it as a constructor parameter for consistency.

Apply this diff if AllowedStates should be initialized via constructor:

 public GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse(
     string? message = null,
     UserLocation? userLocation = null,
-    IEnumerable<AllowedCity>? allowedCities = null)
+    IEnumerable<AllowedCity>? allowedCities = null,
+    IEnumerable<string>? allowedStates = null)
 {
     StatusCode = 451; // HTTP 451 - Unavailable For Legal Reasons (RFC 7725)
     Title = "Unavailable For Legal Reasons";
     Detail = message ?? "Serviço indisponível na sua região.";
     YourLocation = userLocation;
     AllowedCities = allowedCities;
+    AllowedStates = allowedStates;
 }

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8123faa and 913292e.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• docs/skipped-tests-analysis.md (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1 hunks)
• src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/appsettings.Testing.json (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests.csproj

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (4)

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (2)

src/Shared/Models/ApiErrorResponse.cs (1)

• ApiErrorResponse (10-46)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (1)

• City (88-120)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Architecture.Tests/ModuleApiArchitectureTests.cs (1)

• Assembly (312-318)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (3)

• Task (19-71)
• Task (73-95)
• Task (97-119)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IIbgeClient.cs (3)

• Task (11-11)
• Task (12-12)
• Task (13-13)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (2)

• Municipio (9-34)
• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Shared/Serialization/SerializationDefaults.cs (1)

• SerializationDefaults (7-37)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (6)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (16-91)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1)

• IbgeClient (12-122)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Municipio.cs (1)

• GetEstadoSigla (28-28)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Microrregiao.cs (1)

• Microrregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Mesorregiao.cs (1)

• Mesorregiao (9-19)

src/Modules/Locations/Domain/ExternalModels/IBGE/Regiao.cs (1)

• Regiao (9-19)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: code-analysis
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: Security Scan

🔇 Additional comments (10)

tests/MeAjudaAi.ArchitectureTests/DddArchitectureTests.cs (2)

9-12: Past issue resolved: regex constants now correctly used

The regex constants are now properly used with ResideInNamespaceMatching (lines 24, 45, 66, 86, 106) instead of the previous ResideInNamespace, which fixes the issue flagged in past reviews where namespace filters would never match.

Based on past review comments.

---

14-75: Past issue resolved: dependency checks now use concrete namespace strings

The tests now correctly use the GetModuleNamespaces helper to generate concrete namespace strings (e.g., "MeAjudaAi.Modules.Locations.Infrastructure") for HaveDependencyOnAny, fixing the issue from past reviews where regex patterns were incorrectly passed to these predicates.

Based on past review comments.

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (3)

22-25: LGTM! Past review issue resolved.

The implementation now correctly uses the documented IBGE API query endpoint municipios?nome={cityName} instead of the non-existent slug-based path. URL encoding is properly applied with Uri.EscapeDataString. This addresses the critical issue flagged in the previous review.

---

71-97: LGTM!

The method correctly uses the IBGE API endpoint for fetching municipalities by state, applies proper error handling with consistent empty list returns, and normalizes the state code to uppercase. The implementation is solid.

---

102-121: LGTM!

The validation logic is correct: it fetches the municipality details via GetMunicipioByNameAsync and compares the state code case-insensitively. Error handling appropriately returns false for fail-closed behavior.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Location/IbgeApiIntegrationTests.cs (4)

20-31: LGTM!

The test setup properly initializes the HttpClient with configurable base URL, reasonable timeout (30 seconds), and creates the IbgeClient with a NullLogger. The setup is appropriate for integration tests.

---

38-62: LGTM!

The test comprehensively validates the full geographic hierarchy (municipality → microrregion → mesorregion → UF → region). The IBGE code 3129707 used here is correct, and the inconsistency with the XML documentation examples in GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs has already been flagged in that file's review.

---

119-138: LGTM!

The test effectively validates bulk municipality retrieval for Minas Gerais with appropriate assertions: count threshold (>800), presence of expected municipality, and consistency check ensuring all results belong to MG state. Well-structured test.

---

64-221: Excellent test coverage!

The test suite comprehensively covers all IBGE client methods with:

• Happy path scenarios for all three pilot cities (Muriaé, Itaperuna, Linhares)
• Negative case (non-existent city)
• Bulk retrieval tests for all three states (MG, RJ, ES)
• City-state validation (both valid and invalid combinations)
• Parameterized tests for major cities

All tests are properly marked as skipped to avoid unintended real API calls. Well-structured integration test suite.

src/Shared/Models/GeographicRestrictionErrorResponse.cs (1)

30-32: The review comment is incorrect — documentation examples are accurate.

The IBGE codes in the documentation are correct: Muriaé is 3143906, Itaperuna is 3302205, and Linhares is 3203205, matching official IBGE sources. The documentation does not require changes. If discrepancies exist between these codes and the integration tests, the issue lies with the test data, not the documentation examples.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (2)

27-28: Consistent config-based base URLs with test fallbacks

Using configuration with sane defaults (?? "https://...") for all external clients (ViaCep, BrasilApi, OpenCep, Nominatim) is consistent and test-friendly. For production, you might optionally prefer failing fast when these keys are missing (or restricting the fallbacks to test/dev environments) so misconfigurations don't silently hit public endpoints with generic User-Agents.

Also applies to: 34-35, 41-42, 49-50, 55-55

---

59-65: Consider normalizing IBGE base URL to avoid subtle path issues

The IBGE client correctly pulls Locations:ExternalApis:IBGE:BaseUrl with a good default including /api/v1/localidades/. However, if someone configures this value without the trailing /, relative paths like "municipios?..." or "estados/{UF}/municipios" may be combined differently by HttpClient (the last segment can be treated as a file, not a directory).

To harden against config mistakes, you could normalize the base URL:

-        services.AddHttpClient<IIbgeClient, IbgeClient>(client =>
-        {
-            var baseUrl = configuration["Locations:ExternalApis:IBGE:BaseUrl"]
-                ?? "https://servicodados.ibge.gov.br/api/v1/localidades/"; // Fallback para testes
-            client.BaseAddress = new Uri(baseUrl);
-        });
+        services.AddHttpClient<IIbgeClient, IbgeClient>(client =>
+        {
+            var baseUrl = configuration["Locations:ExternalApis:IBGE:BaseUrl"]
+                ?? "https://servicodados.ibge.gov.br/api/v1/localidades/"; // Fallback para testes
+
+            if (!baseUrl.EndsWith("/"))
+            {
+                baseUrl += "/";
+            }
+
+            client.BaseAddress = new Uri(baseUrl);
+        });

This keeps the API usage robust even when the configured value is slightly off.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 913292e and 52bf553.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/MeAjudaAi.ApiService.csproj (1 hunks)
• src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (2 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (3 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/IbgeClient.cs (1)

• IbgeClient (12-122)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/IbgeService.cs (1)

• IbgeService (14-130)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Services/GeographicValidationService.cs (1)

• GeographicValidationService (11-45)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: code-analysis
• GitHub Check: build-and-test

🔇 Additional comments (2)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (2)

6-6: New shared geolocation using looks correct

Importing MeAjudaAi.Shared.Geolocation is appropriate for resolving IGeographicValidationService and keeps the DI wiring self-contained in this module.

---

70-70: Scoped registrations for IBGE and geographic validation services look appropriate

Registering IIbgeService/IbgeService and the adapter IGeographicValidationService/GeographicValidationService as scoped services matches the existing pattern for location services and fits HTTP-client-based dependencies. The adapter comment (Shared → Locations) also makes the layering intent clear.

Also applies to: 72-73

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

61-62: Consider renaming test to reflect actual behavior.

The test name LookupCep_WhenViaCepAndBrasilApiTimeout_ShouldFallbackToOpenCep implies network timeouts, but the test actually simulates invalid/empty JSON responses that trigger deserialization failures. Consider renaming to something like LookupCep_WhenViaCepAndBrasilApiReturnInvalidJson_ShouldFallbackToOpenCep for clarity.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/IbgeUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

71-102: Consider separating assertion of error payload structure.

The test combines two concerns: verifying the 451 status code and validating the error payload JSON structure. If the status code assertion fails, the subsequent JSON parsing will throw an exception obscuring the root cause.

Consider restructuring to handle the status code assertion separately:

         // Assert - Should deny access because city is not in allowed list (451 UnavailableForLegalReasons)
         var content = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
         response.StatusCode.Should().Be(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.UnavailableForLegalReasons,
             $"Expected 451 but got {(int)response.StatusCode}. Response body: {content}");

+        // Only validate payload structure if status code is correct
+        if (response.StatusCode != System.Net.HttpStatusCode.UnavailableForLegalReasons)
+            return;
+
         // Verify error payload structure
         var json = System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.Deserialize<System.Text.Json.JsonElement>(content);

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1)

43-98: Consider using Theory with InlineData for city validation.

The loop-based approach makes debugging harder when a specific city fails. xUnit's [Theory] with [InlineData] would provide clearer test isolation and failure reporting per city.

Example refactor for allowed cities:

[Theory(Skip = "...")]
[InlineData("Muriaé", "MG")]
[InlineData("Itaperuna", "RJ")]
[InlineData("Linhares", "ES")]
public async Task GeographicRestriction_WhenEnabled_ShouldAllowConfiguredCity(string city, string state)
{
    AuthConfig.ConfigureAdmin();
    try
    {
        Client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add(UserLocationHeader, $"{city}|{state}");
        var response = await Client.GetAsync(ProvidersEndpoint);
        response.StatusCode.Should().Be(HttpStatusCode.OK);
    }
    finally
    {
        Client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Remove(UserLocationHeader);
    }
}

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 08e59ed and c60d39c.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (7 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/IbgeUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (4)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/BrasilApiCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (14-48)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/NominatimClient.cs (1)

• Task (24-116)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/OpenCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (15-50)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/ViaCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (15-50)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (4)

src/Modules/Users/API/Authorization/UsersPermissions.cs (1)

• Admin (34-38)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (4)

• Task (242-272)
• Task (301-322)
• Task (327-343)
• Task (348-352)

src/Bootstrapper/MeAjudaAi.ApiService/Middlewares/GeographicRestrictionMiddleware.cs (2)

• Task (23-99)
• Task (143-194)

src/Shared/Contracts/Response.cs (1)

• Response (12-20)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (1)

• WireMockFixture (12-378)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Mocks/MockGeographicValidationService.cs (6)

• MockGeographicValidationService (9-115)
• MockGeographicValidationService (17-20)
• MockGeographicValidationService (25-28)
• MockGeographicValidationService (86-90)
• MockGeographicValidationService (96-100)
• MockGeographicValidationService (106-114)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: code-analysis
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test

🔇 Additional comments (14)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (3)

1-60: LGTM - CEP provider fallback test with correct stub paths.

The WireMock stub paths now correctly match the client implementations:

• ViaCEP: /ws/01310100/json/ matches ViaCepClient.cs:18
• BrasilAPI: /api/cep/v2/01310100 matches BrasilApiCepClient.cs:17

Test logic and assertions are well-structured.

---

114-149: Good test isolation with unique CEP.

Using uniqueCep = "88888888" to avoid cache hits from other tests is a sound practice for test isolation.

---

231-283: Well-documented skip reason for cache test.

The skip message clearly explains why the test is disabled and what would be needed to enable it. This helps future maintainers understand the test's purpose and constraints.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (1)

354-377: Clean disposal pattern.

The DisposeAsync implementation properly stops and disposes the server, nulls the reference, and suppresses finalization.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/IbgeUnavailabilityTests.cs (2)

16-18: Good use of mock override for IBGE-focused tests.

Overriding UseMockGeographicValidation => false allows these tests to exercise the real IGeographicValidationService with WireMock stubs, enabling proper testing of IBGE failure scenarios.

---

20-44: Well-documented skip reason with clear expected vs actual behavior.

The skip message clearly explains the middleware fallback issue and documents the expected behavior. This helps track the bug for future resolution.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (2)

18-39: Properly structured test with header cleanup.

Good use of try/finally to ensure header cleanup, and the skip reason clearly explains the CI issue.

---

100-130: Good fail-open verification test.

This is the only non-skipped test, and it properly verifies the fail-open behavior when location cannot be determined. The header cleanup in the finally block is correctly implemented.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (6)

38-54: Good additions: WireMock accessor and mock toggle.

The UseMockGeographicValidation virtual property allows IBGE-focused tests to override and use the real service with WireMock, addressing the previous review feedback about global mocking hiding real IBGE behavior.

---

83-92: Improved path resolution with warning on failure.

The warning message when path resolution fails helps diagnose CI issues, addressing the previous review feedback about silent failures.

---

96-125: Good in-memory configuration for test consistency.

Injecting test configuration directly ensures consistent behavior across environments, avoiding reliance on file-based config that may differ between local and CI.

---

188-199: Conditional mock registration enables flexible testing.

The conditional replacement of IGeographicValidationService based on UseMockGeographicValidation allows tests to choose between fast mocked tests and full integration tests with WireMock.

---

354-407: Robust multi-strategy path resolution.

The three-strategy approach (environment variable → assembly location → directory search) provides good resilience across different execution contexts. The detailed error logging when all strategies fail aids debugging.

---

63-74: No issues found — IBGE base URL configuration is correct.

The concern about path duplication is unfounded. The HttpClient for IBGE is configured with a baseUrl that is explicitly ensured to end with "/", and the IbgeClient uses relative paths like "municipios?nome={encodedName}" without leading slashes. Per RFC 3986, HTTP clients correctly merge {wireMockUrl}/api/v1/localidades/ + municipios?nome=... → {wireMockUrl}/api/v1/localidades/municipios?nome=... with no duplication.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (2)

16-18: Track the CI middleware registration issue.

Multiple tests are skipped due to the same CI environment issue. Consider creating a GitHub issue to track resolution, so these tests can be re-enabled and provide actual coverage in CI pipelines.

---

93-95: Remove legacy test once Theory tests are validated.

This combined test is marked for removal. Once the CI middleware registration issue is resolved and Theory tests are confirmed working, delete this method to avoid maintaining duplicate test logic.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

61-82: Misleading comments: Test validates invalid JSON deserialization, not timeout.

The comments on lines 64, 72, and 82 state "simulate slow response" and imply timeout behavior, but the HttpClient timeout is configured to 30 seconds (per ServiceDefaults.cs:88), so the 2-second delay won't trigger any timeout. The test actually validates that empty JSON {} fails deserialization validation (missing required fields) and triggers fallback to the next provider. Either remove the delays (they serve no purpose) or clarify the comments to accurately describe the test behavior.

Apply this diff to clarify the comments and optionally remove unnecessary delays:

-    // Arrange - ViaCEP returns invalid/empty JSON (200 with "{}" triggers deserialization failure)
+    // Arrange - ViaCEP returns invalid/empty JSON (missing required fields triggers deserialization failure)
     WireMock.Server
         .Given(global::WireMock.RequestBuilders.Request.Create()
             .WithPath("/ws/01310100/json/")
             .UsingGet())
         .RespondWith(global::WireMock.ResponseBuilders.Response.Create()
             .WithStatusCode(200)
-            .WithBody("{}")
-            .WithDelay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2))); // Delay to simulate slow response
+            .WithBody("{}")); // Empty JSON lacks required fields, causing validation to fail

-    // BrasilAPI returns invalid/empty JSON (200 with "{}" triggers deserialization failure)
+    // BrasilAPI also returns invalid/empty JSON
     WireMock.Server
         .Given(global::WireMock.RequestBuilders.Request.Create()
             .WithPath("/api/cep/v2/01310100")
             .UsingGet())
         .RespondWith(global::WireMock.ResponseBuilders.Response.Create()
             .WithStatusCode(200)
-            .WithBody("{}")
-            .WithDelay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2))); // Delay to simulate slow response
+            .WithBody("{}")); 

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c60d39c and 983dbf6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/IbgeUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (3)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (17-98)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (1)

• ApiTestBase (29-408)

src/Shared/Contracts/Response.cs (1)

• Response (12-20)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (1)

• ApiTestBase (29-408)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: code-analysis

🔇 Additional comments (7)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (3)

1-14: Well-documented test class setup.

The class documentation clearly explains the test scope and limitations. The [Collection("Integration")] attribute ensures proper test isolation.

---

41-91: Good use of Theory tests for parameterized city validation.

The refactoring from a combined loop test to individual [Theory] tests improves test isolation and provides clearer failure reporting per city/state combination. The try/finally blocks ensure proper header cleanup.

---

152-182: Good fail-open validation with proper cleanup.

This test correctly validates the fail-open behavior when location cannot be determined. The defensive header removal at line 161 and try/finally cleanup pattern properly address the previous review feedback about header pollution.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (1)

1-413: Excellent test infrastructure implementation!

The WireMockFixture provides comprehensive API mocking with proper lifecycle management, diverse error scenarios, and correct endpoint paths. The use of dynamic ports prevents parallel test conflicts, and the custom logger appropriately filters noise. All endpoint paths match the client implementations as confirmed by past review resolutions.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

10-287: Comprehensive CEP provider fallback testing.

The test suite thoroughly validates the fallback chain across multiple failure scenarios: HTTP errors, invalid JSON, malformed responses, and total provider failure. The cache test is appropriately skipped with a clear explanation. All endpoint paths correctly match the client implementations.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/IbgeUnavailabilityTests.cs (2)

23-130: All tests skipped due to middleware fallback issues.

The test suite appropriately documents known issues with the geographic restriction middleware's fallback behavior. The skip reasons clearly explain that the middleware doesn't fall back to simple validation when IBGE is unavailable, and CI environment has feature flag or registration issues. These are valuable test cases that should be enabled once the middleware issues are resolved.

---

20-36: The review comment is based on inaccurate assumptions.

Verification confirms that case normalization is already implemented in IbgeClient.GetMunicipioByNameAsync. The code at lines 35–37 shows:

• Line 35: var normalizedCity = trimmedCity.ToLowerInvariant();
• Line 36: var encodedName = Uri.EscapeDataString(normalizedCity);

The "past review analysis" that found no normalization was incorrect. The test comment at line 27 accurately reflects the actual implementation. No action is needed on the test file.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

70-88: Remove unnecessary delays that don't test timeout behavior.

The comments on lines 78 and 88 state "Delay to simulate slow response," but the HttpClient timeout is configured to 30 seconds (per ServiceDefaults), so the 2-second delays won't trigger actual timeout behavior. This test validates deserialization failure (empty JSON {} returns null from the clients), not timeout handling. The delays add 4 seconds to test execution without providing value.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary delays:

         // ViaCEP returns invalid/empty JSON (200 with "{}" triggers deserialization failure)
         WireMock.Server
             .Given(global::WireMock.RequestBuilders.Request.Create()
                 .WithPath($"/ws/{uniqueCep}/json/")
                 .UsingGet())
             .RespondWith(global::WireMock.ResponseBuilders.Response.Create()
                 .WithStatusCode(200)
-                .WithBody("{}")
-                .WithDelay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2))); // Delay to simulate slow response
+                .WithBody("{}"));
 
         // BrasilAPI returns invalid/empty JSON (200 with "{}" triggers deserialization failure)
         WireMock.Server
             .Given(global::WireMock.RequestBuilders.Request.Create()
                 .WithPath($"/api/cep/v2/{uniqueCep}")
                 .UsingGet())
             .RespondWith(global::WireMock.ResponseBuilders.Response.Create()
                 .WithStatusCode(200)
-                .WithBody("{}")
-                .WithDelay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2))); // Delay to simulate slow response
+                .WithBody("{}"));

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 983dbf6 and 091ea9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (8)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (17-98)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/IbgeUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

• Collection (14-131)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (1)

• Collection (9-297)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (5)

• ApiTestBase (29-408)
• Task (242-272)
• Task (301-322)
• Task (327-343)
• Task (348-352)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Infrastructure/WireMockFixture.cs (3)

• Task (29-48)
• Error (399-402)
• Error (404-407)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/BrasilApiCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (14-48)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/OpenCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (15-50)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/ViaCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (15-50)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: code-analysis

🔇 Additional comments (5)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (5)

19-62: LGTM! Fallback from ViaCEP to BrasilAPI is correctly tested.

The test properly validates the fallback behavior when ViaCEP returns a 500 error. The WireMock stubs use correct endpoint paths, and the assertions verify that BrasilAPI successfully provides the address data.

---

120-155: LGTM! Total failure scenario is correctly tested.

The test properly validates that when all CEP providers fail with 500 errors, the lookup returns a failure result. The use of a unique CEP and appropriate assertions ensure test isolation and correctness.

---

157-199: LGTM! Malformed JSON fallback is correctly tested.

The test properly validates fallback behavior when ViaCEP returns malformed JSON that cannot be parsed. The test confirms that BrasilAPI successfully serves as the fallback provider.

---

201-238: LGTM! Invalid CEP detection is correctly tested.

The test properly validates the scenario where ViaCEP explicitly indicates an invalid CEP with {"erro": true}, and all other providers also fail. This ensures the system correctly handles truly invalid CEPs across the entire fallback chain.

---

240-296: LGTM! Skipped cache test is properly documented.

The test is appropriately skipped with a clear explanation that caching is disabled in the integration test environment. The test implementation is complete and ready for use when caching infrastructure is enabled, and it correctly validates cache behavior by comparing request counts.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (1)

307-314: Remove unused descriptor query.

The viaCepDescriptors variable is assigned but never used. Since the comment explicitly states descriptors are not removed and the code relies on AddHttpClient to reconfigure clients, this query serves no purpose.

Apply this diff to remove the dead code:

-        // Remove registrations existentes dos HttpClients CEP
-        var viaCepDescriptors = services.Where(d =>
-            d.ServiceType == typeof(IHttpClientFactory) ||
-            (d.ServiceType.IsGenericType && d.ServiceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IHttpMessageHandlerBuilderFilter)) ||
-            d.ImplementationType?.FullName?.Contains("ViaCepClient") == true).ToList();
-
-        // Não removemos os descriptors, apenas reconfiguramos os HttpClients
-        // porque o AddHttpClient é registrado de forma diferente
-
         // Configure HttpClients to point to WireMock

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3550873 and d4bfc94.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (9 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: code-analysis
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: Security Scan

🔇 Additional comments (4)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (4)

51-55: Excellent solution to enable real IBGE integration testing.

The UseMockGeographicValidation toggle directly addresses the past review comment about global mocking. IBGE-focused tests can now override this property to false and exercise real HTTP client behavior against WireMock stubs, while keeping most tests fast with the mock.

Based on past review comments, this is the recommended approach.

---

192-203: Perfect implementation of conditional mock registration.

This conditional registration directly addresses the past review concern. IBGE-focused integration tests can now set UseMockGeographicValidation = false to exercise the real IGeographicValidationService + IBGE client behavior against WireMock, while keeping standard tests fast with the mock.

Based on past review comments, this implementation is exactly what was requested.

---

317-340: HttpClient reconfiguration pattern is correct.

Multiple AddHttpClient<T> calls with the same type parameter properly replace previous registrations in IHttpClientFactory. This ensures all CEP provider clients and IBGE client use WireMock instead of real external APIs during tests.

---

398-452: Robust path resolution addresses past review concerns.

The multi-strategy approach with environment variable override, assembly-relative resolution, and directory search fallback directly addresses the past review comment about fragile path construction. The clear error and success logging will aid debugging in CI environments.

Based on past review comments, this implementation provides the requested robustness.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/UsersModuleTests.cs (1)

70-88: Skip reason is clear and consistent; consider tying it to a tracking artifact

The detailed skip message is helpful and consistent with the other E2E tests that are currently disabled due to the same auth/test‑host race condition. This is a reasonable temporary move to keep the suite green while infra is fixed.

To avoid this becoming a permanent “hidden” skip, consider:

• Adding a TODO comment or referencing a GitHub issue ID in the skip reason (or nearby comment), and/or
• Centralizing this explanation in a short constant/helper so all affected tests clearly point to the same root cause and tracking item.

Please confirm you have (or will) open a tracking issue for the ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler refactor mentioned in the skip reason so this test can be re‑enabled once fixed.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (2)

66-121: Consider asserting which provider actually handled the request

Right now the “invalid JSON → OpenCEP fallback” test only asserts the final success and city value. To tighten the contract, you could also assert WireMock log counts per provider path (e.g., ViaCEP and BrasilAPI each hit once, OpenCEP hit once) so a future change in provider ordering or short‑circuiting doesn’t silently change behavior while still passing this test.

-        // Assert - Should succeed via OpenCEP fallback
-        result.IsSuccess.Should().BeTrue();
-        result.Value.Should().NotBeNull();
-        result.Value!.City.Should().Be("São Paulo");
+        // Assert - Should succeed via OpenCEP fallback
+        result.IsSuccess.Should().BeTrue();
+        result.Value.Should().NotBeNull();
+        result.Value!.City.Should().Be("São Paulo");
+
+        // And verify provider usage for this CEP
+        var viaCepHits = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/ws/{uniqueCep}/json/");
+        var brasilApiHits = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/api/cep/v2/{uniqueCep}");
+        var openCepHits = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/v1/{uniqueCep}");
+
+        viaCepHits.Should().Be(1);
+        brasilApiHits.Should().Be(1);
+        openCepHits.Should().Be(1);

---

251-308: Make the caching assertion robust by filtering WireMock logs by CEP

Even though this test is currently skipped, when you enable it the assertion based on WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count() could be brittle if other tests share the same server or if collection parallelism changes. Filtering by uniqueCep will make it robust and self‑contained.

-        // Get request count before second call
-        var requestCountBefore = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count();
+        // Get request count before second call (only for this CEP)
+        var requestCountBefore = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/ws/{uniqueCep}/json/" ||
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/api/cep/v2/{uniqueCep}" ||
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/v1/{uniqueCep}");
@@
-        // Get request count after second call
-        var requestCountAfter = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count();
+        // Get request count after second call (only for this CEP)
+        var requestCountAfter = WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Count(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/ws/{uniqueCep}/json/" ||
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/api/cep/v2/{uniqueCep}" ||
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/v1/{uniqueCep}");

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1)

44-94: Clarify purpose and consider consolidation with GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.

This class has significant overlap with GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs, which contains active (non-skipped) tests covering the same scenarios:

• Lines 45-69 duplicate GetProviders_WhenAllowedCity_ShouldReturnOk
• Lines 71-94 duplicate GetProviders_WhenBlockedCity_ShouldReturn451

The class documentation (lines 10-11) states this validates behavior "when feature is enabled," but GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs already does this with passing tests. The stated intent to test "disabled feature" behavior (line 11) isn't demonstrated by any test in this file.

Once the CI issue is resolved, consolidate these tests into GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs to eliminate duplication, or clearly differentiate the purpose of this class (e.g., rename to GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagToggleTests if specifically testing flag on/off transitions).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 627c3de and 31bde22.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/UsersModuleTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (9 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/UsersModuleTests.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/UsersLifecycleE2ETests.cs (6)

• Fact (19-56)
• Fact (58-71)
• Fact (73-101)
• Fact (103-164)
• Fact (166-196)
• Fact (198-235)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs (5)

• Collection (9-297)
• Theory (161-189)
• Theory (195-222)
• Theory (224-255)
• Theory (257-281)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (5)

• ApiTestBase (30-445)
• Task (246-276)
• Task (338-359)
• Task (364-380)
• Task (385-389)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Shared.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionMiddlewareTests.cs (19)

• Fact (32-45)
• Fact (68-90)
• Fact (201-225)
• Fact (227-242)
• Fact (244-261)
• Fact (299-328)
• Fact (330-360)
• Fact (362-396)
• Fact (398-421)
• Fact (423-452)
• Fact (454-483)
• Fact (485-518)
• Fact (520-549)
• Theory (47-66)
• Theory (92-113)
• Theory (115-134)
• Theory (136-154)
• Theory (156-199)
• Theory (263-283)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: code-analysis
• GitHub Check: build-and-test

🔇 Additional comments (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

10-64: Well-structured coverage of CEP fallback scenarios and path alignment

The test class and the first scenario read cleanly: you document the ViaCEP → BrasilAPI → OpenCEP chain, use unique CEPs, AtPriority(1) mappings, and WireMock paths that now match the actual clients (trailing slash for ViaCEP and /api/cep/v2/{cep} for BrasilAPI). This should exercise the real fallback behavior instead of succeeding on misconfigured stubs.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (2)

96-126: LGTM! Header cleanup properly implemented.

The header cleanup issue from the previous review has been correctly addressed. The test now:

• Defensively removes any stale header before starting (line 105)
• Properly cleans up in the finally block (lines 122-124)
• Prevents header pollution across test runs

The fail-open behavior validation logic is correct and aligns with the middleware's expected behavior documented in the unit tests.

---

16-42: ****

The documented skip reasons do not reflect the actual configuration. The feature flag is explicitly enabled in both appsettings.Testing.json ("GeographicRestriction": true) and ApiTestBase.cs (["FeatureManagement:GeographicRestriction"] = "true"). Moreover, GeographicRestrictionIntegrationTests.cs contains 11 equivalent tests that successfully run without skipping (e.g., GetProviders_WhenBlockedCity_ShouldReturn451), testing the same endpoint with identical setup. If the CI environment had a middleware registration issue, these tests would also fail. The actual concern is test duplication: both test classes test identical functionality with the same configuration, suggesting one should be consolidated or removed rather than investigating a non-existent CI configuration problem.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (1)

16-75: Skip annotation is reasonable; suggest tying it to a tracking issue and future re‑enable

The detailed Skip reason makes it clear this is a temporary workaround for the flaky auth/race issue, which is good. To avoid this becoming a permanent silent hole in coverage, I’d recommend:

• Referencing a tracking ticket/issue ID in the Skip message or in a comment above the test.
• Optionally shortening the message (keep core symptom + issue ID) so it’s easier to scan, with the full context in the ticket.
• Adding a brief TODO like // TODO: Fix test auth setup and unskip (see <issue-id>) to make the intent explicit.

This keeps CI green now while making it obvious that the test should be brought back once the auth refactor lands.

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1)

263-267: Skipped test is appropriately documented.

The skip reason clearly explains why the test cannot run in the current environment. Consider tracking this as a follow-up task to enable caching infrastructure in integration tests if cache behavior validation becomes important.

Would you like me to open an issue to track enabling caching infrastructure for integration tests?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31bde22 and a38cffd.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/UsersModuleTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/UsersModuleTests.cs
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Middleware/GeographicRestrictionFeatureFlagTests.cs

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/UsersLifecycleE2ETests.cs (6)

• Fact (19-56)
• Fact (58-71)
• Fact (73-101)
• Fact (103-164)
• Fact (166-196)
• Fact (198-235)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (5)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/Extensions.cs (1)

• Extensions (17-98)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Base/ApiTestBase.cs (5)

• ApiTestBase (30-445)
• Task (246-276)
• Task (338-359)
• Task (364-380)
• Task (385-389)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/BrasilApiCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (14-48)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/ViaCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (15-50)

src/Modules/Locations/Infrastructure/ExternalApis/Clients/OpenCepClient.cs (1)

• Task (15-50)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: code-analysis

🔇 Additional comments (5)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (5)

1-17: LGTM!

Clear documentation of the fallback chain behavior being tested, and proper test class setup inheriting from ApiTestBase.

---

78-133: LGTM!

Test correctly validates the full fallback chain when both ViaCEP and BrasilAPI return empty JSON responses that fail validation.

---

135-173: LGTM!

Good negative test case validating proper failure handling when all providers are unavailable.

---

175-219: LGTM!

Correctly tests the fallback behavior when ViaCEP returns malformed JSON that causes a deserialization exception.

---

221-261: LGTM!

Good edge case test validating behavior when ViaCEP returns {"erro": true} and other providers also indicate the CEP doesn't exist.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (1)

19-19: Consider standardizing skip messages for authentication issues.

The skip messages at lines 19 and 80 both reference authentication problems causing 403 responses, but use different wording and structure. Standardizing these would make it easier to identify and track related skipped tests.

For example, a consistent format could be:

"AUTH: Returns 403 instead of expected <codes>. ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition - tracked in issue #<number>."

Also applies to: 80-80

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (2)

204-248: Consider adding provider hit verification for consistency.

The test validates the fallback scenario but doesn't verify provider call order like tests 1 and 2. Additionally, no OpenCEP stub is configured—if BrasilAPI unexpectedly fails to match, the test behavior becomes unpredictable.

Consider adding hit count verification for consistency with other tests:

         // Assert - Should fallback to BrasilAPI
         result.IsSuccess.Should().BeTrue();
         result.Value.Should().NotBeNull();
+
+        // Verify provider usage order
+        WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Should().Contain(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/ws/{uniqueCep}/json/",
+            "ViaCEP should be tried first");
+        WireMock.Server.LogEntries.Should().Contain(e =>
+            e.RequestMessage.Path == $"/api/cep/v2/{uniqueCep}",
+            "BrasilAPI should succeed as fallback");
     }

---

292-294: Well-documented skipped test with actionable TODO.

The skip reason clearly explains why the test cannot run, and the TODO suggests tracking this as a GitHub issue.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track enabling caching infrastructure for integration tests? The issue could document:

• The current limitation (caching disabled in integration tests)
• The test scenarios that would be enabled (TTL, eviction, hit/miss)
• The implementation approach needed

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a38cffd and f85cd1a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (1 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: code-analysis

🔇 Additional comments (7)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (2)

19-19: Confirm the timeline for re-enabling this test.

Skipping this test reduces coverage for the service validation happy path. What's the timeline for fixing the authentication race condition and re-enabling the affected tests?

---

16-18: Verify creation of GitHub issue tracking the authentication race condition.

The TODO comments at lines 16-18 mention the need to create a GitHub issue, but no issue reference (number or URL) is present in the codebase. While my searches confirm the race condition affects multiple E2E tests across the repository (found 13+ test files referencing ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler), I cannot definitively confirm whether a tracking issue has been created.

To proceed:

• Check the repository's issue list manually to confirm if a tracking issue exists
• If not created, create one to track the authentication infrastructure refactor
• If created, update the TODO comment to reference the issue number (e.g., // See #123)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (5)

10-17: Well-structured test class with clear documentation.

The XML documentation clearly describes the fallback chain behavior (ViaCEP → BrasilAPI → OpenCEP), making the test intent immediately understandable. Good use of [Collection("Integration")] for test isolation.

---

19-84: Test correctly validates fallback behavior with proper isolation.

The baseline counting approach (lines 26-31) combined with unique CEPs provides good test isolation for parallel execution. The stub paths have been corrected to match the client implementations, and the assertion that OpenCEP should not be called when BrasilAPI succeeds (line 83) correctly validates the fallback chain short-circuiting.

---

86-162: Comprehensive test for full fallback chain with invalid JSON responses.

This test effectively validates that empty JSON responses ({}) trigger validation failures and continue the fallback chain. The verification of all three provider hit counts (lines 159-161) ensures the complete chain was exercised.

---

164-202: Clear test for total provider failure scenario.

The test correctly validates that when all providers return 500 errors, the result indicates failure. The simplicity of only checking IsSuccess and Error presence is appropriate here.

---

250-290: Correctly tests invalid CEP handling across all providers.

Using 00000000 for an invalid CEP scenario is appropriate. The test properly validates that the system returns failure when all providers indicate the CEP doesn't exist (ViaCEP's erro: true response and 404s from others).

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (2)

16-20: Tie the auth-race TODO and skip reason to a concrete tracking issue

The TODO and Skip message clearly document the auth race, but they don’t yet point to a specific GitHub issue. Once the issue exists, consider updating both the comment and the Skip text to reference it explicitly (e.g., see #123) so it’s easier to know when this test can be safely unskipped and to avoid this TODO lingering indefinitely.

---

80-82: Avoid duplicating long skip messages across tests

This Skip reason is nearly identical to the one above, just with different expected status codes. To keep messaging consistent across all affected E2E tests and make future edits safer, consider extracting the common part into a shared constant (e.g., AuthTestSkips.ConfigurableHandlerRace) and reusing it in each [Fact(Skip = ...)].

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (2)

213-216: Consider adding field-level assertions for consistency.

The assertions here are less thorough than in other tests (e.g., lines 60-63). For consistency and better test coverage, consider verifying specific fields:

         // Assert - Should fallback to BrasilAPI
         result.IsSuccess.Should().BeTrue();
         result.Value.Should().NotBeNull();
+        result.Value!.City.Should().Be("São Paulo");
+        result.Value.State.Should().Be("SP");

---

260-262: TODO comment indicates missing test infrastructure.

The TODO comment indicates that caching infrastructure needs to be enabled for integration tests. The test implementation looks comprehensive and ready to be enabled once the infrastructure is in place.

Do you want me to open a new issue to track enabling caching infrastructure for integration tests? This would allow validation of cache behavior including TTL, eviction, and hit/miss scenarios as mentioned in the comment.

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/ServiceCatalogsModuleIntegrationTests.cs (1)

13-15: Centralize the auth race-condition skip reason and link the tracking issue explicitly

Using [Fact(Skip = ...)] with a clear reason is a reasonable temporary workaround for the ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition, but with “14+ E2E tests” affected this will be hard to maintain if each test has its own long literal string and only a generic TODO.

Consider:

• Replacing the TODO with a reference to the actual GitHub issue ID once it exists.
• Centralizing the skip reason into a single constant so all affected tests share it and are easy to find when the infra is fixed.

For example:

 public class ServiceCatalogsModuleIntegrationTests : TestContainerTestBase
 {
-    // TODO: Create GitHub issue to track E2E authentication infrastructure refactor.
-    // 14+ E2E tests affected by ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition.
-    [Fact(Skip = "AUTH: Returns 403 instead of expected success. ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition - see issue tracking comment above.")]
+    // TODO: Link to GitHub issue ID tracking the E2E auth infra refactor / race condition.
+    // 14+ E2E tests affected by ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition.
+    private const string AuthRaceConditionSkipReason =
+        "AUTH: Returns 403 instead of expected success due to ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition. See tracking GitHub issue.";
+
+    [Fact(Skip = AuthRaceConditionSkipReason)]
     public async Task ServicesModule_Can_Validate_Services_From_Catalogs()
 ...
-    [Fact(Skip = "AUTH: Returns 403 instead of expected success. ConfigurableTestAuthenticationHandler race condition - see issue tracking comment above.")]
+    [Fact(Skip = AuthRaceConditionSkipReason)]
     public async Task ProvidersModule_Can_Query_Active_Services_Only()

Also, given these are higher-level module integration tests, it’s worth double‑checking that the lower-level API tests in ServiceCatalogsApiTests and other E2Es still give you enough coverage while these remain skipped. Based on relevant_code_snippets, they do cover core endpoints, but please confirm this matches your expectations for geographic‑restriction–related changes.

Also applies to: 45-45

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f85cd1a and 2b63802.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Integration/ServiceCatalogsModuleIntegrationTests.cs (2 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (2 hunks)
• tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧬 Code graph analysis (1)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ServiceCatalogsAdvancedE2ETests.cs (2)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/ProvidersLifecycleE2ETests.cs (6)

• Fact (19-107)
• Fact (109-142)
• Fact (144-199)
• Fact (201-258)
• Fact (260-283)
• Fact (285-343)

tests/MeAjudaAi.E2E.Tests/Modules/UsersLifecycleE2ETests.cs (1)

• Fact (19-56)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)

• GitHub Check: Code Quality Checks
• GitHub Check: Security Scan
• GitHub Check: build-and-test
• GitHub Check: code-analysis

🔇 Additional comments (5)

tests/MeAjudaAi.Integration.Tests/Modules/Locations/CepProvidersUnavailabilityTests.cs (5)

1-17: LGTM!

The test class is properly structured with appropriate imports and collection configuration for integration testing. The XML documentation clearly describes the fallback chain behavior being tested.

---

19-68: LGTM!

The test correctly validates fallback behavior from ViaCEP to BrasilAPI. The endpoint paths are accurate, and the comment explaining why provider hit count assertions are skipped is appropriate given the shared WireMock state in parallel CI execution.

---

70-130: LGTM!

The test properly validates the complete fallback chain when both ViaCEP and BrasilAPI return invalid responses. Using empty JSON to trigger deserialization failure is a good approach to test this scenario.

---

132-170: LGTM!

The test correctly validates the failure scenario when all CEP providers are unavailable. This is an essential negative test case for the fallback chain.

---

218-258: LGTM!

The test properly validates the failure scenario when ViaCEP returns its specific error format ({"erro": true}) and other providers are unavailable. This covers an important edge case for ViaCEP's API behavior.

[github-actions]

📊 Code Coverage Report

Coverage: 28.69% (extracted from OpenCover (Direct))

📈 Coverage Details

• Coverage badges:
• Minimum threshold: 70% (warning) / 85% (good)
• Report format: Auto-detected from OpenCover/Cobertura XML files
• Coverage source: OpenCover (Direct)

📋 Coverage Analysis

• Line Coverage: Shows percentage of code lines executed during tests
• Branch Coverage: Shows percentage of code branches/conditions tested
• Complexity: Code complexity metrics for maintainability

🎯 Quality Gates

• ✅ Pass: Coverage ≥ 85%
• ⚠️ Warning: Coverage 70-84%
• ❌ Fail: Coverage < 70%

📁 Artifacts

• Coverage reports: Available in workflow artifacts
• Test results: TRX files with detailed test execution data

This comment is updated automatically on each push to track coverage trends.