refactor: Model UI Issue + file conventions #383
Conversation
ENG-453 Model UI Issue
When you add a boolean field to a model, the default value column of the boolean becomes longer than others (screenshot below). |
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 2685a40 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 9 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request involve updates to the routing structure and import paths across various components in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UI
participant Router
participant ModelEditRoutes
User->>UI: Navigate to edit page
UI->>Router: Request routing for edit
Router->>ModelEditRoutes: Resolve routes for editing
ModelEditRoutes->>UI: Render edit components
UI->>User: Display edit interface
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (24)
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_routes.tsx (1)
8-17: LGTM! Consider enhancing type safety.The route configuration follows good practices with proper organization of index routes, nested routes, and error handling. The naming is now more consistent using the plural form throughout.
Consider adding a type for the route handle to ensure type safety of the breadcrumb configuration:
interface ModelsRouteHandle { crumb: ReturnType<typeof createRouteCrumb>; } export const ModelsRoutes: RouteObject & { handle: ModelsRouteHandle } = { // ... rest of the configuration };packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_routes.tsx (1)
28-47: Consider adding validation for the :uid parameterWhile the routing structure is well-organized, consider adding validation for the :uid parameter to handle malformed IDs gracefully.
{ path: ':uid', element: <ModelEditLayout />, + errorElement: <Navigate to="../" replace />, handle: { crumb: createCrumbFromUid( modelEntityType, 'Edit Model', '/data/models/edit/:uid', ), }, children: [packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelInfoEditDialog.tsx (1)
Line range hint
44-44: Consider removing unnecessary aria-describedby attribute.The
aria-describedby={undefined}prop is redundant and can be safely removed for cleaner code, as omitting the prop entirely would have the same effect.- <Dialog.Content aria-describedby={undefined}> + <Dialog.Content>packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/primary-key/ModelPrimaryKeyForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
54-58: Consider extracting form submission handlerThe inline form submission handler could be extracted for better readability and reusability.
+ const handleFormSubmit = (e: React.FormEvent) => { + e.stopPropagation(); + return onSubmit(e); + }; + return ( <form className={clsx('space-y-4', className)} - onSubmit={(e) => { - e.stopPropagation(); - return onSubmit(e); - }} + onSubmit={handleFormSubmit} id={formId} >packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldTypeInput.tsx (1)
13-13: Consider documenting the new file convention pattern.The move to prefix-based directory naming (e.g.,
_constants) represents a significant convention change. This pattern should be documented to ensure consistent adoption across the team.Consider adding this convention to your project's README or contributing guidelines. I can help draft the documentation if needed.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_constants.tsx (2)
24-24: Document the purpose of empty getSummary functionThe
getSummaryfunction returns an empty array. Consider adding a comment explaining why no summary is needed for password transformers, or implement a meaningful summary if applicable.- getSummary: () => [], + // Password transformers don't require a summary as they perform a straightforward hash operation + getSummary: () => [],
17-23: Improve readability of transformer validationConsider extracting the validation logic into more readable conditions.
- allowNewTransformer(projectContainer, modelConfig) { - return ( - !modelConfig.service?.transformers?.some( - (t) => t.type === 'password', - ) && modelConfig.model.fields.some((f) => f.name === 'passwordHash') - ); - }, + allowNewTransformer(projectContainer, modelConfig) { + const hasExistingPasswordTransformer = modelConfig.service?.transformers?.some( + (t) => t.type === 'password' + ); + const hasPasswordHashField = modelConfig.model.fields.some( + (f) => f.name === 'passwordHash' + ); + + return !hasExistingPasswordTransformer && hasPasswordHashField; + },packages/ui-components/src/components/InputField/InputField.tsx (1)
32-43: Fix inconsistent indentation in props destructuringWhile the implementation is correct, the indentation in the props destructuring could be more consistent.
( - { - label, - description, - error, - onChange, - register, - wrapperClassName, - ...props - }, - ref, + { + label, + description, + error, + onChange, + register, + wrapperClassName, + ...props + }, + ref, ) => {packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/enums/hooks/useEnumForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint
115-116: Consider making success messages more specific.The success messages could be more informative by including the enum name.
- toast.success('Successfully created enum!'); + toast.success(`Successfully created enum "${updatedDefinition.name}"`); - toast.success('Successfully saved enum!'); + toast.success(`Successfully saved enum "${data.name}"`);
Line range hint
117-124: Consider improving error type handling.The error handling could be more specific about the types of errors it expects to catch.
- } catch (err) { + } catch (err: unknown) { if (err instanceof RefDeleteError) { showRefIssues({ issues: err.issues }); return; } + if (err instanceof Error) { toast.error(logAndFormatError(err)); + } else { + toast.error('An unexpected error occurred'); + } }packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceEmbeddedRelationForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint
19-29: Consider improving type safety.The type casting using
unknowncould be made more type-safe. Consider creating a proper type intersection or using generics.- const formPropsTyped = formProps as unknown as UseFormReturn<{ - prefix: EmbeddedRelationTransformerConfig; - }>; + type EmbeddedRelationForm = { + [K in typeof prefix]: EmbeddedRelationTransformerConfig; + }; + const formPropsTyped = formProps as UseFormReturn<EmbeddedRelationForm>;
Line range hint
71-83: Optimize useEffect dependencies.The
availableRelationsin the dependency array could cause unnecessary re-renders as it's recreated on every render. Consider memoizing it withuseMemo.+ const memoizedAvailableRelations = useMemo(() => availableRelations, [ + availableRelations.map(r => r.relation.foreignId).join(',') + ]); useEffect(() => { if ( previousForeignModelId !== undefined && previousForeignModelId !== embeddedTransformer?.foreignRelationRef ) { setValue(`${prefix}.embeddedFieldNames`, []); if (relation?.model.id) { setValue(`${prefix}.modelRef`, relation?.model.id); } } }, [ prefix, setValue, relation, embeddedTransformer?.foreignRelationRef, previousForeignModelId, - availableRelations, + memoizedAvailableRelations, ]);
Line range hint
143-159: Consider memoizing allowNewTransformer results.The
allowNewTransformermethod performs filtering operations that could be expensive with large datasets. Consider memoizing its results when used in UI components.// Example usage in a component: const canAddTransformer = useMemo( () => embeddedRelationTransformerWebConfig.allowNewTransformer(projectContainer, model), [projectContainer.definition, model.id, model.service?.transformers] );packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_hooks/useModelForm.ts (2)
Line range hint
122-131: Fix duplicate model name validation logic.The duplicate model name check has a bug. It's using
newModel.nameinstead ofupdatedModel.nameordata.name, which could lead to incorrect validation when editing existing models.Apply this fix:
const existingModel = definition.models.find( (m) => m.id !== data.id && - m.name.toLowerCase() === newModel.name.toLowerCase(), + m.name.toLowerCase() === data.name.toLowerCase(), );
Line range hint
133-170: Consider refactoring service method validation for better maintainability.The service method validation logic is nested and could be simplified. Additionally, error messages could be more specific about which service method failed validation.
Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function:
function validateServiceMethod( method: 'create' | 'update', config?: { enabled?: boolean; fields?: any[]; transformerNames?: any[] } ): { isValid: boolean; error?: string } { if (!config?.enabled) { return { isValid: true }; } if (!config.fields?.length && !config.transformerNames?.length) { return { isValid: false, error: `${method.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + method.slice(1)} method must have at least one field or transformer.` }; } return { isValid: true }; } // Usage in onSubmit: const createValidation = validateServiceMethod('create', service?.create); if (!createValidation.isValid) { toast.error(createValidation.error!); return; } const updateValidation = validateServiceMethod('update', service?.update); if (!updateValidation.isValid) { toast.error(updateValidation.error!); return; }packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceMethodFieldsSection.tsx (4)
Line range hint
156-170: Fix incorrect form field name in create transformer switch.The create transformer switch is updating
service.create.fieldsinstead ofservice.create.transformerNames. This could lead to transformers being incorrectly added to the fields array.Apply this fix:
onChange={(value) => setValue( - 'service.create.fields', + 'service.create.transformerNames', value ? [...createTransformers, transformer.id] : createTransformers.filter( (id) => id !== transformer.id, ), { shouldDirty: true }, ) }
Line range hint
171-185: Fix incorrect form field name in update transformer switch.Similar to the create transformer switch, the update transformer switch is using the wrong field name.
Apply this fix:
onChange={(value) => setValue( - 'service.update.fields', + 'service.update.transformerNames', value ? [...updateTransformers, transformer.id] : updateTransformers.filter( (id) => id !== transformer.id, ), { shouldDirty: true }, ) }
Line range hint
134-143: Add error handling for transformer web config retrieval.The
getTransformerWebConfigcall could potentially return undefined if the transformer type is not found. This should be handled gracefully.Apply this fix:
<BadgeWithTypeLabel type={ - transformerWeb.getTransformerWebConfig( - transformer.type, - BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS, - ).label + transformerWeb.getTransformerWebConfig( + transformer.type, + BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS, + )?.label ?? 'Unknown' } >
Line range hint
48-52: Consider improving table accessibility.The table implementation could benefit from better accessibility features:
- Add
scope="col"to header cells- Add
aria-labelto describe the table's purpose- Consider adding row headers for better screen reader navigation
Example improvement:
- <table className={tableClassName}> + <table + className={tableClassName} + aria-label="Field and transformer configuration table" + > <thead> <tr> - <th className="w-full">Fields</th> + <th scope="col" className="w-full">Fields</th> {isCreateEnabled && ( - <th className="pl-8">Create</th> + <th scope="col" className="pl-8">Create</th> )} {isUpdateEnabled && ( - <th className="pl-8">Update</th> + <th scope="col" className="pl-8">Update</th> )} </tr> </thead>packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldDefaultValueInput.tsx (4)
Line range hint
49-71: Consider usingundefinedinstead of empty string for resetThe reset functionality currently sets an empty string as the default value. For better type safety and consistency with other field types in this component, consider using
undefinedinstead.- setValue(`model.fields.${idx}.options.default`, '', { + setValue(`model.fields.${idx}.options.default`, undefined, { shouldDirty: true, })
Line range hint
102-153: Consider extracting UUID options dropdown into a separate componentThe UUID field type handling contains complex dropdown logic that could be extracted into a separate component for better maintainability and reusability.
Example structure:
function UUIDOptionsDropdown({ optionsValue, onOptionsChange }) { return ( <Dropdown> <Dropdown.Trigger asChild> <Button.WithOnlyIcon title="Options" variant="ghost" size="icon" icon={HiDotsVertical} /> </Dropdown.Trigger> <Dropdown.Content> <Dropdown.Group> <Dropdown.Item onSelect={() => onOptionsChange({ ...optionsValue, genUuid: true })} > Random UUID v4 </Dropdown.Item> </Dropdown.Group> </Dropdown.Content> </Dropdown> ); }
Line range hint
187-187: Maintain consistency in spacing utilitiesOther sections use
gap-1, but this section usesspace-x-1. Maintain consistency by usinggap-1throughout the component.- <div className="flex items-center space-x-1"> + <div className="flex items-center gap-1">
Line range hint
163-268: Consider simplifying DateTime/date field type handlingThe DateTime/date field type handling contains duplicate code patterns and complex conditional logic. Consider extracting common patterns and simplifying the logic.
Example approach:
function DateTimeOptionsDropdown({ optionsValue, onOptionsChange }) { const options = [ { label: 'Now', value: { defaultToNow: true, updatedAt: false } }, { label: 'Last Updated At', value: { defaultToNow: true, updatedAt: true } } ]; return ( <Dropdown> <Dropdown.Trigger asChild> <Button.WithOnlyIcon title="Options" variant="ghost" size="icon" icon={HiDotsVertical} /> </Dropdown.Trigger> <Dropdown.Content> <Dropdown.Group> {options.map(option => ( <Dropdown.Item key={option.label} onSelect={() => onOptionsChange({ ...optionsValue, ...option.value })} > {option.label} </Dropdown.Item> ))} </Dropdown.Group> </Dropdown.Content> </Dropdown> ); }packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/graphql/GraphQLObjectTypeSection.tsx (1)
8-10: Consider using path aliases to improve import readabilityThe multiple levels of parent directory traversal (
../../../) make the imports harder to maintain. Consider using path aliases (e.g.,@constants,@hooks) to simplify these imports.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (39)
.changeset/little-zebras-boil.md(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/index.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/_routes.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/_layout.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/_routes.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/enums/EnumsSidebarList.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/enums/hooks/useEnumForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_components/ModelsSidebarList.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_components/NewModelDialog.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_constants.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_hooks/useModelForm.ts(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_routes.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/constants/built-in-transformers.ts(0 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelInfoEditDialog.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelRelationsSection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelUniqueConstraintsSection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelAddFieldButton.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldDefaultValueInput.tsx(7 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldTypeInput.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/badges/ModelFieldBadges.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/primary-key/ModelPrimaryKeyForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/relations/ModelRelationForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/unique-constraints/ModelUniqueConstraintBadge.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/unique-constraints/ModelUniqueConstraintForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/graphql/GraphQLMutationsSection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/graphql/GraphQLObjectTypeSection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceEmbeddedRelationForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceMethodFieldsSection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceTransformerForm.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceTransformersSection.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_layout.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_routes.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/graphql.page.tsx(2 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/index.page.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/service.page.tsx(1 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit/_routes.tsx(0 hunks)packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/index.page.tsx(2 hunks)packages/ui-components/src/components/InputField/InputField.tsx(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/constants/built-in-transformers.ts
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit/_routes.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- .changeset/little-zebras-boil.md
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/enums/EnumsSidebarList.tsx
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_components/ModelsSidebarList.tsx
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldForm.tsx
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/badges/ModelFieldBadges.tsx
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/relations/ModelRelationForm.tsx
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/index.page.tsx
- packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/service.page.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (41)
packages/project-builder-web/src/index.tsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! The import path update aligns with the new file convention.
The change to import router from '_routes' follows a clear convention for organizing special files, improving code discoverability.
Let's verify the router file exists in the new location:
✅ Verification successful
Import path update is correctly implemented and router file exists at the new location
The verification confirms:
- The router file exists at
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/_routes.tsx - The file contains the expected router implementation with proper exports
- The change aligns with the broader pattern of using
_routesfiles, as evidenced by imports from./data/_routesand./settings/_routes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the router file exists in the new location and check for any lingering references to the old path
# Check if the new router file exists
fd -p "pages/_routes.tsx$"
# Check for any remaining imports from the old path that might need updating
rg "from ['\"].*\/pages['\"];" --type tsx
Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and verify both the new router file and any remaining imports
# Verify the new router file exists and check its content
echo "=== Router file content ==="
cat packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/_routes.tsx
# Check for any remaining imports from the old path that might need updating
echo -e "\n=== Checking imports from /pages ==="
rg "from ['\"].*pages['\"]" --type tsx
Length of output: 1856
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/_routes.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM! Verify the rename is consistent.
The rename from ModelRoutes to ModelsRoutes (singular to plural) is more accurate as it likely handles multiple models.
Let's verify the rename is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The rename to ModelsRoutes is consistent across the codebase
All references to the route component use the new plural form ModelsRoutes. Found in:
- Definition:
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_routes.tsx - Import and usage:
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/_routes.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old name
# Search for any remaining references to ModelRoutes
rg "ModelRoutes" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for new ModelsRoutes usage to ensure consistency
rg "ModelsRoutes" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restrictions since tsx might not be recognized
# Search for any remaining references to both old and new names
rg "ModelRoutes|ModelsRoutes"
Length of output: 316
3-3: LGTM! Verify the new import paths exist.
The updated import paths follow better file naming conventions with underscore prefixes for internal modules.
Let's verify the new file paths exist:
Also applies to: 5-5
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are correctly updated and files exist
The verification confirms:
- The new file
_layout.tsxexists in the data directory - The new file
_routes.tsxexists in the models directory - Both
DataLayoutandModelsRoutesare properly defined and referenced in their respective files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new module files
# Check if the new layout file exists
fd -t f "_layout.tsx" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data
# Check if the new routes file exists
fd -t f "_routes.tsx" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models
Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the files
# Check for _layout.tsx file
find packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data -name "_layout.tsx" -type f
# Check for _routes.tsx file in models directory
find packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models -name "_routes.tsx" -type f
# Search for DataLayout references
rg "DataLayout" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data
# Search for ModelsRoutes references
rg "ModelsRoutes" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data
Length of output: 1107
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_routes.tsx (1)
3-4: LGTM! Verify the new import paths.
The import changes follow better naming conventions and resource hierarchy. The plural form for collection views and the .id suffix in the route path better represent the resource structure.
Let's verify the existence and structure of the new paths:
✅ Verification successful
Import paths and component names are correctly aligned ✅
The verification confirms that:
- The import paths in
_routes.tsxcorrectly match the file structure ModelEditRoutesis properly exported fromedit.id/_routes.tsxModelsIndexPageis correctly exported fromindex.page.tsx- All imports and exports are consistent with the new naming conventions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the new file structure exists and follows conventions
fd -t f "(_routes|index\.page)\.tsx$" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/
Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the imports and exports in these files to ensure consistency
echo "=== Checking imports in _routes.tsx ==="
rg "import.*Routes|import.*Page" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_routes.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Checking exports in edit.id/_routes.tsx ==="
rg "export.*Routes" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_routes.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Checking ModelsIndexPage in index.page.tsx ==="
rg "export default.*ModelsIndexPage" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/index.page.tsx
Length of output: 787
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/index.page.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM! Component name better reflects its purpose.
The rename from ModelListPage to ModelsIndexPage better aligns with the file's role as an index page and follows consistent naming patterns.
45-45: LGTM! Export statement correctly updated.
The export statement has been properly updated to reflect the component rename.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/graphql.page.tsx (3)
4-8: LGTM! Clean organization of imports
The reorganization of imports into _components/graphql and _hooks directories improves code organization and follows React best practices.
39-39: LGTM! Export statement updated correctly
The default export has been properly updated to match the new component name.
11-11: Verify component rename impact
The rename from ModelEditSchemaPage to ModelEditGraphQLPage better reflects the component's purpose. However, we should verify that all references to this component have been updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of _routes.tsx to ensure the component is properly referenced there.
Component rename is properly implemented
The component rename from ModelEditSchemaPage to ModelEditGraphQLPage has been correctly implemented. The verification shows:
- No remaining references to the old name
ModelEditSchemaPagein the codebase - The new name
ModelEditGraphQLPageis properly referenced in both the component file and the routes configuration - The routing setup in
_routes.tsxcorrectly imports and uses the renamed component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old component name
# This helps ensure the rename was complete across the codebase
echo "Checking for any remaining references to ModelEditSchemaPage..."
rg "ModelEditSchemaPage" -l
echo "Checking for references to the new ModelEditGraphQLPage..."
rg "ModelEditGraphQLPage" -l
Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of _routes.tsx to verify proper component usage
echo "Content of _routes.tsx:"
cat packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_routes.tsx
Length of output: 1433
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_routes.tsx (3)
1-10: LGTM! Well-organized imports with clear separation
The imports are logically grouped between external and internal dependencies, with good use of absolute imports for better maintainability.
11-18: LGTM! Clean route configuration with proper type safety
The route configuration follows React Router v6 best practices with proper type annotations and a sensible redirect for the index route.
19-27: Verify consistent breadcrumb implementation
The breadcrumb configuration looks good, but let's verify the consistency of the implementation across the application.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the breadcrumb implementation across the codebase.
Breadcrumb implementation is consistent across the application
The createCrumbFromUid function is consistently used across different entity types:
- Models:
/data/models/edit/:uid - Plugins: Edit Plugin
- Apps: Edit App
- Enums:
/data/enums/edit/:uid
All implementations follow the same pattern of providing entity type, display name, and optional URL path, ensuring a uniform breadcrumb experience throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of createCrumbFromUid across the codebase
# Check for other usages of createCrumbFromUid to verify consistency
echo "Checking createCrumbFromUid usage patterns:"
rg "createCrumbFromUid\(" -A 3
# Check for other route configurations with handle.crumb
echo "Checking other route configurations with breadcrumbs:"
ast-grep --pattern 'handle: {
crumb: $$$
}'
Length of output: 2079
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/unique-constraints/ModelUniqueConstraintBadge.tsx (1)
9-9: LGTM! Import path update aligns with new file conventions.
The change to use _hooks directory follows the PR's objective of improving file organization.
Let's verify the consistency of this convention across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path is correctly updated and consistent with codebase patterns
The verification shows that:
- The hook is correctly located in
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_hooks/ - All imports across the codebase consistently use the new path pattern with
_hooksdirectory - No old import paths remain in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that hooks are consistently placed in _hooks directories
# and that no old import paths remain
# Check if there are any remaining imports from the old path
rg "from '@src/pages/data/models/hooks/useEditedModelConfig'"
# Verify that hooks are consistently placed in _hooks directories
fd -t d "_hooks$" src/
Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive verification approach
# 1. Find all files containing useEditedModelConfig imports
rg "useEditedModelConfig"
# 2. Check the directory structure to locate _hooks directories
find . -type d -name "_hooks"
# 3. Look for the actual hook implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useEditedModelConfig'
Length of output: 7537
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/_routes.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Import path update aligns with file conventions.
The change to import DataRoutes from './data/_routes' follows the established pattern of organizing route definitions in dedicated _routes.tsx files, improving consistency across the codebase.
Let's verify that other route definitions follow the same convention:
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint 23-47: Layout structure looks good and handles overflow properly.
The component's layout implementation is well-structured with:
- Proper flex layout and overflow handling
- Clear navigation with tabs
- Consistent spacing using utility classes
- Type-safe CSS custom property usage
6-6: LGTM! Import path update aligns with file organization goals.
The change to import ModelHeaderBar from the _components directory follows good practices for organizing related components together.
Let's verify the new component location:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change verified successfully
The ModelHeaderBar component exists at the new location: packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelHeaderBar.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that ModelHeaderBar exists in the new location
fd --type f "ModelHeaderBar.tsx" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components
Length of output: 193
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_components/NewModelDialog.tsx (1)
8-9: LGTM! Import paths updated to follow new file conventions.
The import path changes align with the PR's objective of improving file organization by:
- Moving hooks to dedicated '_hooks' directory
- Moving components to dedicated '_components' directory
Let's verify the new import paths exist and are consistently used:
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are correctly updated and consistently used across the codebase
The verification confirms that:
- Both files exist at their new locations:
useModelForm.tsin_hooksdirectoryModelInfoForm.tsxinedit.id/_componentsdirectory
- All imports across the codebase are using the correct relative paths to these new locations
- No outdated import paths remain that need updating
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new import paths exist and are used consistently
# Check if the new paths exist
fd -t f "useModelForm.ts" -p "_hooks"
fd -t f "ModelInfoForm.tsx" -p "_components"
# Check for any remaining old import paths that need updating
rg -l "from ['\"].*hooks/useModelForm['\"]"
rg -l "from ['\"].*model/ModelInfoForm['\"]"
Length of output: 775
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the paths
# First, let's find the actual location of these files
fd "useModelForm.ts"
fd "ModelInfoForm.tsx"
# Then check the actual import paths being used
rg "import.*useModelForm" -A 1
rg "import.*ModelInfoForm" -A 1
Length of output: 2170
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/_layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint 10-57: LGTM! Well-structured layout implementation.
The DataLayout component demonstrates good practices:
- Proper error handling with ErrorBoundary
- Responsive design with calculated heights
- Clean separation of concerns between navigation and content
- Type-safe implementation
7-7: LGTM! Import path update aligns with new file conventions.
The updated import path follows the new convention of organizing components into _components directories, which improves the project's structure and maintainability.
Let's verify the consistency of this pattern across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path update is consistent with established _components pattern
The verification shows that the import path change aligns with a well-established pattern in the codebase. The _components directory structure is consistently used throughout the models section, with numerous components properly organized in this way:
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_components/packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/
While there are other components in the codebase that don't follow this pattern, they belong to different architectural layers (like shared/core components in src/components/) which intentionally follow different conventions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other components follow the same _components directory convention
# and if there are any components that still need to be moved.
# Check for components in _components directories
echo "Components properly organized in _components directories:"
fd -e tsx -e ts --full-path "_components/"
# Check for potential components that might need to be moved
echo -e "\nPotential component files that might need to be moved to _components:"
fd -e tsx -e ts | rg -v "_components/" | rg "(?i)component|list|button|field|view|modal|panel"
Length of output: 23964
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/primary-key/ModelPrimaryKeyForm.tsx (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path update aligns with file convention improvements
The updated import path follows the new file organization convention using _hooks directory, which improves code maintainability and structure.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceTransformerForm.tsx (1)
17-17: LGTM! Import path updated to follow new file conventions.
The change aligns with the PR objectives of improving file organization by moving hooks to a dedicated _hooks directory.
Let's verify the consistency of this convention across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent with ongoing migration to _hooks directory
The import path change in ServiceTransformerForm.tsx is part of a larger migration where model-related hooks are being moved to a dedicated _hooks directory. The search results show:
- The hook
useEditedModelConfigis consistently imported from the new_hooksdirectory across all its usages - Only two hooks files exist in the models
_hooksdirectory, following the new convention - Other hooks in the codebase are yet to be migrated, indicating this is an ongoing effort focused on the models section first
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that hooks are consistently placed in _hooks directories
# and that there are no remaining hooks in the old location
# Check if there are any files still using the old hooks directory
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' 'from.*["\'].*\/hooks\/.*["\']'
# Check if all hook files are properly placed in _hooks directories
fd -e ts -e tsx -g '**/hooks/*.{ts,tsx}'
# Verify the new convention is followed
fd -e ts -e tsx -g '**/_hooks/*.{ts,tsx}'
Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any files still using the old hooks directory
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "from.*['\"].*\/hooks\/.*['\"]"
# Check if all hook files are properly placed in _hooks directories
fd -e ts -e tsx -p "hooks/"
# Verify the new convention is followed
fd -e ts -e tsx -p "_hooks/"
Length of output: 3309
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any imports referencing the hooks in the models directory
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "from.*['\"].*models/hooks/.*['\"]"
# And check specifically for files importing useEditedModelConfig
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "from.*useEditedModelConfig"
Length of output: 3413
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldTypeInput.tsx (1)
13-13: LGTM! Verify consistent usage of new constants path.
The import path change aligns with the PR's goal of improving file conventions.
Let's verify that other files are consistently using the new _constants pattern:
✅ Verification successful
Import path changes are consistently applied across the codebase
The verification shows that all related files are using the new _constants import pattern consistently. No references to the old constants/scalar-types path remain in the codebase. The change aligns well with the standardization effort.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to the old constants path
# and verify consistent usage of the new pattern
# Check for any remaining references to the old path
rg -l "constants/scalar-types"
# Check usage pattern of the new _constants directory
rg -l "_constants"
Length of output: 479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual import statements in these files to verify consistency
for file in $(rg -l "_constants"); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "from.*_constants';" "$file"
done
# Also check if there are any remaining old-style imports
rg "from.*constants/scalar-types';"
Length of output: 1907
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_constants.tsx (1)
1-5: LGTM! Import organization aligns with new file conventions
The imports are well-organized and follow the new file convention pattern using _components directory structure.
packages/ui-components/src/components/InputField/InputField.tsx (3)
16-16: LGTM: Clean import addition
The addition of the cn utility import is appropriate for handling className concatenation.
28-28: LGTM: Well-typed prop addition
The wrapperClassName prop is properly typed as an optional string, providing good flexibility for styling customization while maintaining type safety.
45-49: LGTM: Clean implementation of wrapper styling
The implementation properly combines the default styling with the optional wrapper className using the cn utility, maintaining backward compatibility while adding styling flexibility.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/unique-constraints/ModelUniqueConstraintForm.tsx (1)
16-16: LGTM! Import path update aligns with file convention improvements.
The updated import path follows the new convention of using _hooks directory for internal hooks, which is consistent with the broader refactoring effort to improve file organization.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelRelationsSection.tsx (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path update aligns with new file conventions.
The change to use the _hooks directory follows the established convention for internal modules.
Let's verify the consistency of this convention across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Import path update is consistent with new file structure
The verification confirms that:
- The hook file exists in the new
_hooksdirectory - All imports of
useEditedModelConfigare consistently using the new_hookspath - The change aligns with the project's convention as evidenced by the presence of
_hooksdirectory in the models section
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that hooks are consistently placed in _hooks directories
# and that there are no remaining references to the old path
# Check if there are any remaining imports from the old hooks directory
echo "Checking for any remaining imports from old hooks directory..."
rg "from ['\"].*\/hooks\/useEditedModelConfig['\"]"
# Verify that other hooks follow the same _hooks convention
echo "Verifying _hooks directory convention..."
fd -t d "_hooks$"
Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and try again with proper escaping
echo "Checking for any remaining imports from old hooks directory..."
rg "from ['\"].*hooks/useEditedModelConfig['\"]"
# Let's also check current imports pattern to verify consistency
echo -e "\nChecking current _hooks imports pattern..."
rg "from ['\"].*_hooks/useEditedModelConfig['\"]"
# Let's check if there are any other hooks in the old directory structure
echo -e "\nChecking for any files in old hooks directory..."
fd "hooks$" --type d
# Let's verify the hook file exists in the new location
echo -e "\nVerifying hook file in new location..."
fd "useEditedModelConfig" --type f
Length of output: 8007
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelAddFieldButton.tsx (2)
11-11: LGTM! Import path update aligns with new file conventions.
The change to use _hooks directory follows the PR's objective of improving file organization.
11-11: Verify the hook's new location.
Let's ensure the hook file exists in the new location and that this convention is applied consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Import path is correct and follows consistent convention
The hook exists at packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_hooks/useEditedModelConfig.tsx and all imports across the codebase correctly reference this location using relative paths. The _hooks directory convention is consistently used.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the hook's new location and consistent usage of _hooks directory
# Check if the hook exists in the new location
fd "useEditedModelConfig" --type f
# Check for any remaining references to the old hooks directory
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "from.*['\"].*hooks/useEditedModelConfig['\"]"
# Check for consistent usage of _hooks directory
fd "_hooks" --type d
Length of output: 3572
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/enums/hooks/useEnumForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint 52-70: Well-implemented error handling and memoization!
The changes improve the robustness of the hook by:
- Adding proper null checks for enum definitions
- Using appropriate error types for not found cases
- Efficiently memoizing default values
21-21: Verify consistency of the new _utils folder convention.
The import path change aligns with the PR's file convention improvements. However, we should ensure this convention is applied consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is consistent with local convention
The change from utils to _utils in the models directory is consistent within its scope. All imports of URL utilities from the models directory are using the _utils pattern (models/_utils/url). This is a localized convention specific to the models directory, while the rest of the codebase maintains its own utility folder structures (e.g., @src/utils/error, src/utils/casing).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for inconsistent utils folder naming across the codebase
# Expected: All utility imports should use _utils instead of utils
# Check for remaining 'utils' (without underscore) folders
fd --type d 'utils$' --exclude node_modules
# Check for any remaining imports from non-prefixed utils folders
rg "from ['\"].*utils/" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 1655
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more specific search to find imports from utils folders
# First, let's check imports in the specific package
rg "from ['\"].*utils/" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/ --type typescript
# Then check if there are other files using the _utils pattern
rg "from ['\"].*_utils/" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/ --type typescript
# Also check for any other imports specifically from the models/utils or models/_utils
rg "from ['\"].*models/[_]?utils/" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/ --type typescript
Length of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the file type and try again with both .ts and .tsx extensions
# Check imports from utils folders
rg "from ['\"].*utils/" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/ -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
# Check imports using _utils pattern
rg "from ['\"].*_utils/" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/ -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
# Check imports specifically from models/utils or models/_utils
rg "from ['\"].*models/[_]?utils/" packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/ -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 2454
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/graphql/GraphQLMutationsSection.tsx (1)
13-13: LGTM! Import path updated to follow new file conventions.
The updated import path aligns with the PR's objective of improving file organization by moving hooks into a dedicated _hooks directory.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceEmbeddedRelationForm.tsx (1)
16-16: Verify consistent hook import paths across the codebase.
The import path change aligns with the new file convention of using _hooks directory. Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other files.
✅ Verification successful
Import path change is correctly implemented
The verification shows that the import path for useEditedModelConfig is consistently implemented across all files, using either relative paths (../../../_hooks/useEditedModelConfig) or the absolute path (@src/pages/data/models/_hooks/useEditedModelConfig). The hook is properly located in the _hooks directory and all imports reference this location correctly. The change in ServiceEmbeddedRelationForm.tsx follows this established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent import paths of useEditedModelConfig
# Expected: All imports should use _hooks directory
# Search for any imports of useEditedModelConfig
rg "import.*useEditedModelConfig.*from" --type typescript
# Search for any remaining old-style hook imports
rg "import.*from.*hooks/useEditedModelConfig" --type typescript
Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent import paths of useEditedModelConfig
# Expected: All imports should use _hooks directory
# Search for any imports of useEditedModelConfig without file type flag
rg "import.*useEditedModelConfig.*from"
# Search for any remaining old-style hook imports
rg "import.*from.*hooks/useEditedModelConfig"
# List all files that might contain this hook
fd "useEditedModelConfig"
Length of output: 6347
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceTransformersSection.tsx (1)
21-22: LGTM! Import paths updated to follow better file organization.
The changes align with the PR's objective of improving file organization by moving constants and hooks to dedicated directories (_constants and _hooks).
Let's verify that these imports are consistently updated across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check for the BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS imports more thoroughly:
This will help us verify:
- All current imports of BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS
- The definition location of this constant
to ensure the import path changes are consistent across the codebase.
Import paths are correctly updated and consistent across the codebase
The verification confirms:
BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGSis correctly defined in_constants.tsxand imported from thereuseEditedModelConfigimports are consistently using the new path across all files- No stale imports were found using the old paths
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining old import paths that might have been missed
# Check for any remaining old imports of BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS
rg "import.*BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS.*from.*constants/built-in-transformers"
# Check for any remaining old imports of useEditedModelConfig
rg "import.*useEditedModelConfig.*from.*hooks/useEditedModelConfig"
Length of output: 3002
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports of BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS
rg "import.*BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS" -A 1
# Check if the constant is defined in the new location
rg "export.*BUILT_IN_TRANSFORMER_WEB_CONFIGS" -A 1
Length of output: 696
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_hooks/useModelForm.ts (2)
22-22: LGTM: Import path update aligns with new file conventions.
The updated import path follows the new file convention using _utils directory structure.
Line range hint 171-180: LGTM: Comprehensive error handling implementation.
The error handling implementation is well-structured with:
- Specific handling for reference deletion errors
- User-friendly toast notifications
- Generic error formatting for unexpected cases
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/service/ServiceMethodFieldsSection.tsx (1)
12-17: LGTM! Import paths updated to follow new directory structure.
The reorganization of imports to reference _constants and _hooks directories follows good React project conventions for better code organization.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/fields/ModelFieldDefaultValueInput.tsx (2)
79-97: LGTM! Good use of flex layout and proper reset handling
The changes improve the layout consistency and properly handle the reset functionality using undefined.
Line range hint 1-271: Overall changes improve UI consistency and maintainability
The changes successfully improve the UI by:
- Introducing consistent button styling with Button.WithOnlyIcon
- Adding proper flex layouts with wrapperClassName
- Maintaining proper type safety in most reset operations
While there are some minor improvements suggested above, the overall changes are well-structured and align with the PR objectives.
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/graphql/GraphQLObjectTypeSection.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-248: Well-structured component with good UX considerations
The component is well-implemented with:
- Proper TypeScript typing
- Effective use of React hooks
- Good accessibility with aria-labels
- Smart UX with collapsible sections for large datasets
- Clear visual feedback with expand/collapse icons
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/edit.id/_components/ModelInfoEditDialog.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_constants.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
|
||
| import { ModelUniqueConstraintDialog } from './fields/unique-constraints/ModelUniqueConstraintDialog'; | ||
| import { useEditedModelConfig } from '../../hooks/useEditedModelConfig'; | ||
| import { useEditedModelConfig } from '../../_hooks/useEditedModelConfig'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent hook directory organization needs attention
The verification reveals inconsistent organization of hooks across the codebase:
- While the PR correctly moves hooks to
_hooksin the models directory, there are many hooks scattered across different locations:- Several hooks in
packages/project-builder-web/src/hooks/ - Hooks directly in component directories
- Multiple hooks in template directories
- Some hooks in feature-specific directories without the
_hooksconvention
- Several hooks in
This change should be part of a broader effort to standardize hook organization. Consider:
- Moving all hooks to
_hooksdirectories within their respective feature folders - Establishing clear guidelines for hook placement in the codebase
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The import path change aligns with the file convention improvements.
The update to use _hooks directory follows common conventions for denoting internal implementation details.
Let's verify the consistency of this convention across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the consistent usage of _hooks directory
# and ensure no references to the old path remain
# Check if there are any remaining imports from the old path
echo "Checking for any remaining old import paths..."
rg "from '\.\./\.\./hooks/useEditedModelConfig'"
# Verify the convention is applied consistently
echo "Verifying _hooks directory usage..."
fd -t d "_hooks$"
# Check if there are any hooks not in _hooks directories
echo "Checking for hooks outside _hooks directories..."
rg -g "!**/_hooks/**" -g "**/*.{ts,tsx}" "^(export )?((function)|(const)) use[A-Z].*"
Length of output: 8061
packages/project-builder-web/src/pages/data/models/_constants.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/ui-components/src/components/InputField/InputField.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kingston
left a comment
kingston
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh shoot - I didn't realize my review hadn't been submitted. Submitting
wrapperClassNameto theInputFieldcomponentSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
wrapperClassNameto theInputFieldcomponent for enhanced styling flexibility.ModelListPagetoModelsIndexPagefor better clarity in the models' index view.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation