-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.2k
Issue #273: Caching Patterns [new pattern] #277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…lation errors + decrease in code coverage
Remarks:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@waisuan I'm done reviewing. Overall the implementation looks good. When you've implemented the changes please comment on this thread and I'll check again. |
Hello @iluwatar. Thanks for the feedback. Kindly check the latest changes and let me know if there is anything else that I have missed out. Thanks. P.S. And yes, I have left an option to use MongoDB as the backend DB as an alternative. Initially, I was testing with Mongo but it slipped my mind that this approach might cause the global maven compilation to fail when running the tests. So, I set the default DB to an internal structure instead to avoid said issue. Also, you're correct -- setting the flag in
|
Issue #273: Caching Patterns [new pattern]
Thank you very much for the valuable contribution! |
2 solutions
Hello.
Feel free to review the code that I have committed for the new/mentioned pattern. Do let me know if you discover any issues with the commit.
Thanks!