-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.6k
Feature: broader uses for watch plugins #6473
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
SimenB
merged 11 commits into
jestjs:master
from
deliciousinsights:feat/broader-watch-plugins
Jul 12, 2018
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f21640d
Allow WatchPlugins access to a broader list of global config options
tdd 21a93b4
Tests for whitelisting config options in WatchPlugins
tdd bd8a325
Docs on allowed config options in WatchPlugins
tdd cfa476e
chore: Changelog
tdd e09f018
tests: leverage it.each to clean up code
tdd a5f5c4b
refactor: centralize config update logic
tdd 1cd159a
Merge branch 'master' into feat/broader-watch-plugins
tdd 1366412
Merge branch 'master' into feat/broader-watch-plugins
rogeliog e093885
Update plugin test to use new signature for configs
rogeliog 8793918
Refactor watch extensions as per PR review (#6473)
tdd f36e644
Merge branch 'master' into feat/broader-watch-plugins
tdd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Docs on allowed config options in WatchPlugins
- Loading branch information
commit bd8a325b4c3a77ca094235ce9f080efde202bf6f
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/cli.html#changedsince, https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/cli.html#lastcommit and https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/cli.html#onlychanged would be awesome as well. Maybe https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/en/cli.html#logheapusage?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @SimenB!
--changedSinceand--lastCommitdo not have any direct equivalent in the global configuration object. They're used bygetChangedFilesForRootsinjest-changed-files, and are also ignored when--onlyChanged(which is the default watch mode), so they don't seem to make sense in that mode. At any rate, the watch architecture would not let us change that on the fly right now, this is a bootstrap-time computation.--onlyChangedis already togglable in watch mode: these are theakey (all tests, same as--watchAll) vs.okey (only changed tests, same as--onlyChanged).--logHeapUsagedoes have a matching boolean in the global config, so I'm open to adding it, what do others think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in the same way toggling
onlyChangedis useful, I thinkchangedSincewould be useful. It would then overwriteonlyChanged.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SimenB I agree it would be nice, but Jest's current architecture doesn't let us do it. It computes the watched list at boot time, then keeps it in a closure where specific global config options may amend it (such as the watch mode). There's no stuff in there right now for
changedSinceorlastCommit, and I feel the change would be significant.This specific PR is bound by what's in the global config. Should this feature set become config-based, I'll be glad to expand the white list, but it's a different feature scope IMHO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rogeliog sounds like we need another of your magical refactor runs 😀
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah we would need to change a couple of things in order to make that happen 🙃