Re-apply Black formatting, and wrap docstrings at ~88 columns. #639
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been away for quite some time (things came up, sorry) and am just getting back up to speed on the issues and PRs that have arisen. As preparation for other changes, this PR re-applies Black formatting and wraps docstrings at a more reasonable ~88 columns, matching Black's default line length.
It seems that CI is failing on master, but this PR doesn't change anything other than code formatting, so I'll probably end up merging it despite the CI failure, and then hopefully be able to fix CI next/soon. FWIW, tests at least seem to pass with 2.7.18 and 3.9.6 running locally on an M1 Mac - just that some of the other Python versions seem to fail in CI in tox's matrix testing.