Skip to content

Conversation

vincepri
Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri commented Dec 3, 2020

After adding the metadata only watch and client support, the List object
was type checking on Unstructured instead of UnstructuredList.

Now! "Why were the tests passing??" one might ask, it seems that even
though our tests had some using UnstructuredLists and querying against
List, the objects we were asking (appsv1/Deployments) are core objects
that are usually included in the default client-go scheme.Scheme.

For the above reason, the internal typedClient was able to make the
request to the API server and convert the list of object back to
UnstructuredList.

/milestone v0.5.x

After adding the metadata only watch and client support, the List object
was type checking on `Unstructured` instead of `UnstructuredList`.

Now! "Why were the tests passing??" one might ask, it seems that even
though our tests had some using UnstructuredLists and querying against
List, the objects we were asking (appsv1/Deployments) are core objects
that are usually included in the default client-go scheme.Scheme.

For the above reason, the internal `typedClient` was able to make the
request to the API server and convert the list of object back to
UnstructuredList.

Signed-off-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.5.x milestone Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 3, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member Author

vincepri commented Dec 3, 2020

/assign @alvaroaleman @DirectXMan12

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vincepri
Copy link
Member Author

vincepri commented Dec 3, 2020

Going to open a PR for release-0.6 and the main branch

@alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8d52513 into kubernetes-sigs:release-0.5 Dec 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants