Skip to content

Conversation

@edwinjosechittilappilly
Copy link
Collaborator

@edwinjosechittilappilly edwinjosechittilappilly commented Jul 28, 2025

Added BLE001 to the per-file ignores for test files to allow broad-exception catching. Reformatted the scripts ignore list for consistency.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated configuration formatting for improved readability.
    • Allowed broad-exception catching in backend tests.

Added BLE001 to the per-file ignores for test files to allow broad-exception catching. Reformatted the scripts ignore list for consistency.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The update modifies the linting configuration in pyproject.toml by reformatting the ignore list for the scripts/* path and adding a new ignore rule BLE001 for the src/backend/tests/* path. No changes were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Linting Configuration
pyproject.toml
Reformatted the ignore list for scripts/* to a single line and added BLE001 to ignores for src/backend/tests/*.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch add-exception-ruff

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 28, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Cristhianzl Cristhianzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@SonicDMG SonicDMG temporarily deployed to add-exception-ruff - langflow-manual-install PR #9206 July 29, 2025 14:34 — with Render Destroyed
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 52.73%. Comparing base (629a6d2) to head (1fa26f0).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (52.73%) is below the target coverage (60.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9206   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.72%   52.73%           
=======================================
  Files         634      634           
  Lines       43605    43605           
  Branches      125      125           
=======================================
+ Hits        22992    22995    +3     
+ Misses      20563    20560    -3     
  Partials       50       50           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 52.57% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@edwinjosechittilappilly edwinjosechittilappilly added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 575cb7f Jul 29, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@edwinjosechittilappilly edwinjosechittilappilly deleted the add-exception-ruff branch July 29, 2025 14:52
2getsandesh pushed a commit to 2getsandesh/langflow-IBM that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2025
…9206)

Update Ruff per-file ignores for tests and scripts

Added BLE001 to the per-file ignores for test files to allow broad-exception catching. Reformatted the scripts ignore list for consistency.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants