Add APIs from the Explicit Resource Management

[pepelsbey]

Summary

This goes along with the MDN content PR by @Josh-Cena.

• Adds new APIs from the Explicit Resource Management draft shipped by Firefox 141
• Adds missing spec URLs
• Updates standards_track to true

Test results and supporting details

For Firefox 141 and Chrome 134 these are supported:

• javascript.builtins.AsyncDisposableStack.@@asyncDispose
• javascript.builtins.AsyncIterator.@@asyncDispose
• javascript.builtins.DisposableStack.@@dispose
• javascript.builtins.Iterator.@@dispose
• javascript.builtins.SuppressedError.error
• javascript.builtins.SuppressedError.suppressed

Related issues

• Reference for stage 3 explicit-resource-management content#38027
• Bugzilla: Ship Explicit Resource Management

[github-actions]

Tip: Review these changes grouped by change (recommended for most PRs), or grouped by feature (for large PRs).

[pepelsbey]

@Josh-Cena, could you please have a quick look if everything is in order here? All features you have documented are present, and the links to the spec are correct. Thanks!

@Elchi3 I was hoping to get the support data for the new features from the collector run if possible. Could you please help with that? Thank you.

[Elchi3]

Unfortunately, the collector doesn't yet know automatically about things coming from ECMAScript proposals (tracked in openwebdocs/mdn-bcd-collector#893). I opened openwebdocs/mdn-bcd-collector#2589 for the missing pieces.

[Josh-Cena]

Stuff here look pretty good to me

[Elchi3]

For Firefox 141 and Chrome 134 these are supported:

• javascript.builtins.AsyncDisposableStack.@@asyncDispose
• javascript.builtins.AsyncIterator.@@asyncDispose
• javascript.builtins.DisposableStack.@@dispose
• javascript.builtins.Iterator.@@dispose

No support in any browser so you shouldn't add these.

• javascript.builtins.SuppressedError.error
• javascript.builtins.SuppressedError.suppressed

[Josh-Cena]

It's not possible for ERM to be supported without the two properties you mentioned

[Elchi3]

It's not possible for ERM to be supported without the two properties you mentioned

Ah thanks, then the collector tests I added are wrong. Will look into it.

To move this PR forward, I would then assume same support for the new entries you're adding.

[pepelsbey]

To move this PR forward, I would then assume same support for the new entries you're adding.

Thank you!

[Elchi3]

Thank you! 👍