lack of was_touched for pin_logo makes it less useful as a 'third button'

[jaustin]

For the buttons we can easily write code that's not super time-dependent wrt things happening in the main loop, by using was_pressed. However, with the pin_logo, as far as I can see can only test whether it is_touched.

I wouldn't be against having a was_pressed for all touch pins, either. Does anyone recall the reason for not having was_ methods for pins?

[microbit-carlos]

I don't recall there being a specific reason why pin_logo.was_pressed() was not added, I think it was mostly a matter of not being specified.

The rational at the time was to implement pin_logo similarly to the pin0/1/2, as a MicroBitTouchPin instance, as that is really what it is. The only class with a was_pressed() method is the MicroBitButton, so it is not present in the large pins either:

• https://microbit-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/v2-docs/pin.html#microbit.MicroBitTouchPin
• https://microbit-micropython.readthedocs.io/en/v2-docs/button.html#Button.was_pressed

So if we'd like to implement this it would have to be by adding a was_touched method to MicroBitTouchPin, which would apply to pin 0/1/2 as well.

[jaustin]

I'm fully supportive of adding was_touched to all pins, including the logo, unless it presents significant size or performance issues on V1/V2.

[dpgeorge]

For V1 this should be straightforward, because all the code is already there to debounce touch and compute the "was touched" state. It just has to be wired up for P0/P1/P2.

For V2 it depends on the CODAL. The logo should work fine because uBit.logo is a TouchButton instance with a wasPressed() method. For P0/P1/P2 it's not clear that it'll work because I don't see any instance of a Button/TouchButton for these pins.

[microbit-carlos]

CODAL ticket:

• wasTouched() method for pins 0, 1, and 2 lancaster-university/codal-microbit-v2#251

[dpgeorge]

I assume we also want to implement get_touches() which will return the number of touches since the last time it was called.

[microbit-carlos]

Yes, for symmetry we should add get_touches().
Is MicroBitButton.get_presses() method implemented in MicroPython? So I assume adding it to the touch button doesn't require an additional CODAL method other than wasTouched()?

---

Edit: Just saw the comment in lancaster-university/codal-microbit-v2#251 (comment) 👍

[dpgeorge]

was_touched() and get_touches() have now been implemented on v1.

[dpgeorge]

CODAL as at v0.2.63 has added the wasTouched() method.

[dpgeorge]

was_touched() and get_touches() have been implemented on pin0, pin1, pin2 and pin_logo in 957e810

For pin_logo the code now uses uBit.io.logo.isTouched() rather than uBit.logo.buttonActive() to implement the Python-level pin_logo.is_touched() method. I'm not sure if this makes a difference? From my testing the new version seems less sensitive.