Add support for generating and validating compiled model compatibility info #25749
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 10 commits
July 31, 2025 00:04
…ion initialization
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
onnxruntime/core/session/plugin_ep/ep_plugin_provider_interfaces.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…/onnxruntime into adrastogi/model-compat
onnxruntime/core/session/plugin_ep/ep_plugin_provider_interfaces.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…es.cc Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Hi @adrastogi / @adrianlizarraga - is GetCompiledModelCompatibility API going to be available for non-ABI interfaces as well? Do you have an ETA for this draft PR to merge? |
|
Hey @thevishalagarwal- yes, the implementation supports non-ABI interfaces as well. We're trying to get this in as soon as we can (pending a few loose ends that we're chasing down). In reply to: 3209754229 |
…ensure graph is fully initialized))
adrianlizarraga
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2025
adrianlizarraga
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
…y info (#25749) ### Description This pull request introduces a new mechanism for validating compiled model compatibility with execution providers (EPs) in ONNX Runtime. It adds infrastructure for EPs to generate and store compatibility information in model metadata, and for the runtime to enforce compatibility checks during session initialization. ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> The APIs proposed in this PR address two requirements: 1. Apps that have an already pre-compiled model on device need a way to determine if the pre-compiled app is still valid (given the EPs / drivers / etc. on the system). 2. Apps may have many different pre-compiled versions of a model stored on a remote server, and want to figure out which of those models they should download for the device where they are running. ### Testing Validated that the new suite of tests passes cleanly. Created a private build of this ORT and the AMD Vitis EP. I stepped through the core logic (the EP doesn't have this support wired up as yet so there is no compatibility info written out) and for regression purposes, confirmed I could compile and run inferences through ResNet. --------- Co-authored-by: Aditya Rastogi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
adrianlizarraga
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2025
### Description Cherry-pick the following PRs into the `rel-1.23.0` branch: - #25592 - #25622 - #25688 - #25729 - #25743 - #25769 - #25745 - #25761 - #25751 - #25716 - #25228 - #25768 - #25788 - #25747 - #25800 - #25818 - #25762 - #25749 - #25831 ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> --------- Co-authored-by: quic-tirupath <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: quic-calvnguy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: qti-kromero <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jeff Kilpatrick <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Scott McKay <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Fan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: kuanyul-qti <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dmitri Smirnov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chi Lo <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Edward Chen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Chunye Wang@AMD <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: minfhong-qti <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vishal Agarwal <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maximilian Müller <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maximilian Müller <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Changming Sun <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: adrastogi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Aditya Rastogi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
gedoensmax
pushed a commit
to gedoensmax/onnxruntime
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2025
…y info (microsoft#25749) ### Description This pull request introduces a new mechanism for validating compiled model compatibility with execution providers (EPs) in ONNX Runtime. It adds infrastructure for EPs to generate and store compatibility information in model metadata, and for the runtime to enforce compatibility checks during session initialization. ### Motivation and Context <!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? - If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. --> The APIs proposed in this PR address two requirements: 1. Apps that have an already pre-compiled model on device need a way to determine if the pre-compiled app is still valid (given the EPs / drivers / etc. on the system). 2. Apps may have many different pre-compiled versions of a model stored on a remote server, and want to figure out which of those models they should download for the device where they are running. ### Testing Validated that the new suite of tests passes cleanly. Created a private build of this ORT and the AMD Vitis EP. I stepped through the core logic (the EP doesn't have this support wired up as yet so there is no compatibility info written out) and for regression purposes, confirmed I could compile and run inferences through ResNet. --------- Co-authored-by: Aditya Rastogi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request introduces a new mechanism for validating compiled model compatibility with execution providers (EPs) in ONNX Runtime. It adds infrastructure for EPs to generate and store compatibility information in model metadata, and for the runtime to enforce compatibility checks during session initialization.
Motivation and Context
The APIs proposed in this PR address two requirements:
Testing
Validated that the new suite of tests passes cleanly.
Created a private build of this ORT and the AMD Vitis EP. I stepped through the core logic (the EP doesn't have this support wired up as yet so there is no compatibility info written out) and for regression purposes, confirmed I could compile and run inferences through ResNet.