Lexical scope for constraining clause of encapsulated class?

[JM-KANE]

model Test
  replaceable encapsulated model A
    Real x = 1;
    Real y = 1;
  end A constrainedby C(x = y);  // C and y cannot be looked up in the enclosing scope?
  replaceable encapsulated model B = C /* illegal base class */ constrainedby C(x = y);
  
  model C
    Real x = 0;
  end C;  
  A a;
  B b;
  Real y = 2;
end Test;

in 4.6.1, encapsulated short class introduce an additional lexical scope for modifiers, will this also apply to constraining clause? And what about encapsulated long class?

[JM-KANE]

encapsulated in System Modeler does not seem to affect the long class‘s modifer.