Skip to content

Conversation

@przemyslaw-jakielaszek
Copy link
Contributor

@przemyslaw-jakielaszek przemyslaw-jakielaszek commented Oct 22, 2020

There is a newer version of ecdsa 0.16.0. We can unpin version, because all of tests passed.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #192 (fcae04f) into master (82bd8aa) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #192   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.51%   93.51%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        1728     1728           
=======================================
  Hits         1616     1616           
  Misses        112      112           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 82bd8aa...fcae04f. Read the comment docs.

@m-aciek
Copy link

m-aciek commented Oct 30, 2020

Hi @blag, could you review and merge the change? It looks like new version of ecdsa gives some performance boost.

@Colin-b
Copy link

Colin-b commented Nov 18, 2020

Hello maintainers, can you have a look at this? the new pip resolver will prevent usage of ecdsa 0.16 even if it can be used with python-jose.

@blag
Copy link
Contributor

blag commented Nov 19, 2020

NAK. Just because the most recent version of ecdsa works for us doesn't mean that 0.15 won't mess things up somehow. We still need to blacklist ecdsa 0.15: ecdsa != 0.15.

@blag blag mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2020
@blag blag added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement help wanted labels Nov 19, 2020
@blag blag merged commit a2a4c31 into mpdavis:master Nov 23, 2020
@blag
Copy link
Contributor

blag commented Nov 23, 2020

Thanks!

dreid added a commit to dreid/python-jose that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2020
The previous pull request mpdavis#192 only changed the pin in requirements.txt and not in setup.py, so the ecdsa<0.15 restriction would actually be used by pip.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement help wanted

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants