Skip to content

Conversation

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in chat with @szaimen

This is fixing a regression because the label we introduced was called "New" and is supposed to be that cause most actions in it are "New …".

Signed-off-by: Jan C. Borchardt <[email protected]>
@jancborchardt jancborchardt added regression Regression of a previous working feature 3. to review Waiting for reviews design Related to the design labels Nov 15, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (24a1850) 92.10% compared to head (81f323a) 92.10%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #957   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.10%   92.10%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines          76       76           
  Branches       13       13           
=======================================
  Hits           70       70           
  Misses          3        3           
  Partials        3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@juliusknorr juliusknorr mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2023
1 task
Copy link
Contributor

@szaimen szaimen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pushed a fix for the tests which should hopefully be green now

Signed-off-by: Simon L <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews design Related to the design regression Regression of a previous working feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants