Skip to content

Conversation

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Contributor

The last major was v7.0.0 and I see there is a stable7, so I assume master changes are going to be released as either 7.1 or 8.0 depending on whether we have breaking changes.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Wurst <[email protected]>
@skjnldsv
Copy link
Contributor

Who created the stable7 branch?

@mejo-
Copy link
Contributor

mejo- commented Oct 19, 2022

Who created the stable7 branch?

That was me, after discussion in the fontenders room. But I'm a naive novice 😬 So I'm totally fine with removing the branch and continuing 7.0 development in master.

@skjnldsv
Copy link
Contributor

Well, no worries, just wondering if there is a underlying motive 😝

We never did that in this repo. I am much more in favour of keeping this one as 7.x.x until 8.x.x as usual.
Otherwise it's just duplicating all the mess with backports etc etc

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay but while we are here, what if we bump to 7.1 and release this shiny new component #3369?

@mejo-
Copy link
Contributor

mejo- commented Oct 19, 2022

I am much more in favour of keeping this one as 7.x.x until 8.x.x as usual.
Otherwise it's just duplicating all the mess with backports etc etc

Yep, let's do that. Unfortunately I lack the permissions to delete the protected branch stable7, so could someone with super powers do that?

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay then we don't release the component.

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst deleted the chore/version-bump-7.1.0 branch October 21, 2022 13:46
@skjnldsv
Copy link
Contributor

skjnldsv commented Nov 15, 2022

@ChristophWurst we will, we just never preemptively bumped versions on master before releasing.
Anyway, 7.1.0 it is! 🚀

#3480

@skjnldsv skjnldsv mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants