-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
Update polyfill #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update polyfill #10
Conversation
|
The diff looks confusing, because the polyfill stuff actually didn't change, just the dependency of those? |
|
Yes it seem so. It is just a version bump with some dep upgrades as I understand it. |
|
Just want to get 3rdparty deps a bit more in shape again ;) |
| "require": { | ||
| "php": ">=5.3.3", | ||
| "paragonie/random_compat": "~1.0" | ||
| "paragonie/random_compat": "~1.0|~2.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't bump to 2.0. This breaks compatibility: https://github.com/paragonie/random_compat/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#version-200---2016-03-18
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is the dep of our dep, not a file we touch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah. But using 2.0 here will break stuff. We can't take that. Sorry 👎
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also see the diff above, the 1.0 version has been replaced with 2.0. We should keep 1.0.x here for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically with 2.0 instances where /dev/urandom is not readable will fail pretty hard ;)
|
👍 |
|
Since we drop the 5.4 and 5.5 support we can drop polyfill 5.5 snd 5.6? |
See #11 ;) |
No description provided.