Skip to content

Conversation

@edward-ly
Copy link
Contributor

@edward-ly edward-ly commented Feb 28, 2025

@edward-ly edward-ly force-pushed the feat/webhook-calendar-obj-event branch 2 times, most recently from 105aee0 to 65b415a Compare March 4, 2025 16:54
@susnux susnux requested review from ChristophWurst and st3iny March 17, 2025 11:22
@edward-ly edward-ly changed the title feat: add schema for CalendarObjectCreatedEvent webhook feat: add schemas for new calendar object webhook events Mar 17, 2025
@edward-ly edward-ly force-pushed the feat/webhook-calendar-obj-event branch from 65b415a to fc04d64 Compare March 17, 2025 17:07
@edward-ly edward-ly enabled auto-merge March 17, 2025 17:12
@edward-ly edward-ly merged commit 99d4e19 into master Mar 17, 2025
12 checks passed
@edward-ly edward-ly deleted the feat/webhook-calendar-obj-event branch March 17, 2025 17:12
Copy link
Member

@st3iny st3iny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just realized that we are leaking Sabre classes in this public (OCP) API, for example, in the supported component set member. I know it's a bit late now but we should keep that in mind for the future.

@edward-ly
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do the Sabre classes contain important information that may be useful for webhooks? If not, maybe it's OK to filter out some unneeded properties.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants