Skip to content

Conversation

@wiswedel
Copy link
Contributor

@wiswedel wiswedel commented Dec 6, 2019

Signed-off-by: Sascha Wiswedel [email protected]

@wiswedel
Copy link
Contributor Author

wiswedel commented Dec 6, 2019

The padding after the numbers is quite narrow, but I'm incapable of fixing that. Can someone please have a look at that?

image

I think it's logically safe to push the solution into this polishing PR.

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member

The padding after the numbers is quite narrow, but I'm incapable of fixing that. Can someone please have a look at that?

This is something that should be changed/fixed broadly with our design rules and not just here so we can have a consistent appearance.

@wiswedel
Copy link
Contributor Author

wiswedel commented Dec 9, 2019

The padding after the numbers is quite narrow, but I'm incapable of fixing that. Can someone please have a look at that?

This is something that should be changed/fixed broadly with our design rules and not just here so we can have a consistent appearance.

@ChristophWurst Fine for me. How do I get this onto that design rules fix backlog?

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member

The padding after the numbers is quite narrow, but I'm incapable of fixing that. Can someone please have a look at that?

This is something that should be changed/fixed broadly with our design rules and not just here so we can have a consistent appearance.

cc @nextcloud/designers

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

The list styling is a strange way to do this here, so that’s why it looks strange. Nothing wrong with the list styling, instead the flow should be adjusted. Mostly this is about wording:

Folder to transfer
( Select )

New owner
[ Search users ]

( Transfer foldername to username)

Transfer button on the bottom should be greyed out until both folder and recipient are selected.

@wiswedel
Copy link
Contributor Author

( Transfer foldername to username)

I'm not capable of implementing this. Anyone else?

This was referenced Dec 11, 2019
@wiswedel wiswedel marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2019 15:23
@wiswedel wiswedel added 18-feedback 3. to review Waiting for reviews and removed 2. developing Work in progress labels Dec 12, 2019
@gary-kim
Copy link
Member

gary-kim commented Dec 15, 2019

@wiswedel How is this?
Screenshot from 2019-12-15 17-29-00
P.S. I can rebase this when I have a moment.

@rullzer
Copy link
Member

rullzer commented Dec 16, 2019

@gary-kim awesome. Lets go for that

@gary-kim gary-kim force-pushed the wiswedel/transferOwnership/polishing branch from 3e60c83 to 6df800e Compare December 16, 2019 08:25
@gary-kim
Copy link
Member

Made a few changes with @jancborchardt
@ChristophWurst Do you want to take another look?
Screenshot from 2019-12-16 16-28-21

Copy link
Member

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code changes look good

Touched files like apps/settings/js/vue-3.js seem unrelated? Did you install npm dependencies before the build?

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member

Also, this needs a rebase to resolve the conflicts

@gary-kim gary-kim force-pushed the wiswedel/transferOwnership/polishing branch from 6df800e to 771fce2 Compare December 16, 2019 09:14
@gary-kim
Copy link
Member

Rebased.

Touched files like apps/settings/js/vue-3.js seem unrelated? Did you install npm dependencies before the build?

The CI webpack-build succeeded so it looks like those files should be touched? Let's see if the new build passes.

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member

Yes, let's see. +95 −10,994 is very suspicious, though 🤔

@gary-kim gary-kim force-pushed the wiswedel/transferOwnership/polishing branch 2 times, most recently from c681fcf to 3f4d24e Compare December 16, 2019 13:03
@gary-kim
Copy link
Member

@ChristophWurst Looks like the webpack-build is still passing. I'm also not entirely sure what part of the change resulted in all those removals.

Copy link
Member

@jancborchardt jancborchardt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice and simple design-wise now. :) Thanks a lot @gary-kim and @wiswedel!

wiswedel and others added 8 commits December 17, 2019 10:38
Signed-off-by: Sascha Wiswedel <[email protected]>
Use Reject instead of Decline


Signed-off-by: Sascha Wiswedel <[email protected]>
note about incoming transfer taken out by background job

resolves #18272

Signed-off-by: Sascha Wiswedel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Gary Kim <[email protected]>
wrapped notifications into double quotes to make line breaks possible

Signed-off-by: Sascha Wiswedel <[email protected]>
@rullzer rullzer force-pushed the wiswedel/transferOwnership/polishing branch from c3bd6aa to a1df5d1 Compare December 17, 2019 09:38
@rullzer
Copy link
Member

rullzer commented Dec 17, 2019

@ChristophWurst fixed with #18438

:)

@gary-kim gary-kim added 4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish and removed 3. to review Waiting for reviews labels Dec 17, 2019
@rullzer rullzer merged commit 4c1c475 into master Dec 17, 2019
@rullzer rullzer deleted the wiswedel/transferOwnership/polishing branch December 17, 2019 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish enhancement feature: users and groups

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants