Skip to content

Conversation

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member

There is a lot of dark magic we use for user change propagation. That is why removing the emit stuff in #18225 failed on CI terribly. This needs a more in-depth analysis.

To still get the new events in for 18 I created a modified version where I leave the old mechanisms in place and just convert the old stuff to the new (and not the other way around). The cleanup will follow for 19.

Supersedes #18225.

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst force-pushed the enhancement/typed-user-events-II branch from c58f144 to d808f9c Compare December 11, 2019 09:00
Copy link
Member

@skjnldsv skjnldsv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Crazy work!
We shall document this!

@ChristophWurst
Copy link
Member Author

We shall document this!

on my todo :)

@skjnldsv skjnldsv added the pending documentation This pull request needs an associated documentation update label Dec 11, 2019
@rullzer rullzer mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2019
43 tasks
Copy link
Member

@rullzer rullzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets do this!

@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst added 4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish and removed 3. to review Waiting for reviews labels Dec 11, 2019
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst merged commit 917f180 into master Dec 11, 2019
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst deleted the enhancement/typed-user-events-II branch December 11, 2019 11:02
@ChristophWurst ChristophWurst removed the pending documentation This pull request needs an associated documentation update label Apr 9, 2020
@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

ref #14552

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish enhancement technical debt

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants