Skip to content

[ProvisioningAPI] Allow specifying group display name during creation #27089

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Pytal merged 5 commits into from
Jun 9, 2021
Merged

[ProvisioningAPI] Allow specifying group display name during creation #27089

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
101153c
[ProvisioningAPI] Allow specifying group display name during creation
m7913d May 24, 2021
644cb41
Fixed indentation
m7913d May 24, 2021
cb95b8d
Group may be null if backend doesn't support creating groups
m7913d May 31, 2021
befd045
Added tests for specifying custom display name during group creation.
m7913d May 31, 2021
e16682a
Effectively return a valid group as it would be the case in a real
m7913d Jun 5, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Fixed indentation 
Signed-off-by: Dries Mys <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
@m7913d
m7913d committed Jun 5, 2021
commit 644cb4154b423bfbf7562928ac3841a1644cdc98
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion apps/provisioning_api/lib/Controller/GroupsController.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ public function addGroup(string $groupid, string $displayname = ''): DataRespons
}
$group = $this->groupManager->createGroup($groupid);
if ($displayname !== '') {
Copy link
Member

@skjnldsv skjnldsv May 25, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also check if not null

Copy link
Member

@blizzz blizzz May 25, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for null, the parameter list needs to be adjusted. but it might be that null is passed when displayname was not provided by the client - at least i believe to remember, but didn't doublecheck. Integration tests pass, should be ok

Copy link
Member

@skjnldsv skjnldsv May 26, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just repeating what psalm is saying 😉 🦜

Copy link
Contributor Author

@m7913d m7913d Jun 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@skjnldsv I added a null check and I throw an exception if it is the case. However, this results in a failure of the nodb test (see continuous integration). Shouldn't I throw an exception in this case or is the failing nodb test wrong? It seems to me appropriate that an error message is returned in case the group creation failed.

$group->setDisplayName($displayname);
$group->setDisplayName($displayname);
}
return new DataResponse();
}
Expand Down