Skip to content

Get access list share by email recipients #32631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
AndyScherzinger merged 5 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Get access list share by email recipients #32631

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
26ae5e6
ShareByMailProvider: getAccessList: return full list of recipients
ASerbinski May 27, 2022
9c528d4
ShareByMailProvider: getAccessList: add token to returned array
ASerbinski May 27, 2022
34ca6bd
ShareByMailProvider: getAccessList: recommended style changes
ASerbinski May 27, 2022
01e3234
ShareByMailProvider: getAccessList: set both array keys 'public' and …
ASerbinski Jan 26, 2023
f45eb75
ShareByMailProvider: getAccessList: set correct value for 'public'
ASerbinski Mar 21, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
ShareByMailProvider: getAccessList: return full list of recipients 
Previously was returning only boolean true if the Node was shared
by email, or false if not. Now provides an array containing the
list of email share recipients.

Signed-off-by: Adam Serbinski <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
@ASerbinski
ASerbinski committed Mar 21, 2024
commit 26ae5e6dfbdd482e6fbfe1cd6a1161ff39f984cc
16 changes: 12 additions & 4 deletions apps/sharebymail/lib/ShareByMailProvider.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1098,18 +1098,26 @@ public function getAccessList($nodes, $currentAccess): array {
}

$qb = $this->dbConnection->getQueryBuilder();
$qb->select('share_with')
$qb->select('share_with', 'file_source')
->from('share')
->where($qb->expr()->eq('share_type', $qb->createNamedParameter(IShare::TYPE_EMAIL)))
->andWhere($qb->expr()->in('file_source', $qb->createNamedParameter($ids, IQueryBuilder::PARAM_INT_ARRAY)))
->andWhere($qb->expr()->orX(
$qb->expr()->eq('item_type', $qb->createNamedParameter('file')),
$qb->expr()->eq('item_type', $qb->createNamedParameter('folder'))
))
->setMaxResults(1);
));
$cursor = $qb->executeQuery();

$mail = $cursor->fetch() !== false;
$mail = array();
while ($row = $cursor->fetch()) {
if ($currentAccess === false) {
$mail[] = $row['share_with'];
} else {
$mail[$row['share_with']] = [
'node_id' => $row['file_source']
];
}
}
$cursor->closeCursor();

return ['public' => $mail];
Expand Down
14 changes: 9 additions & 5 deletions lib/private/Share20/Manager.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1672,9 +1672,10 @@ public function userDeletedFromGroup($uid, $gid) {
* |-folder2 (32)
* |-fileA (42)
*
* fileA is shared with user1 and user1@server1
* fileA is shared with user1 and user1@server1 and email1@maildomain1
* folder2 is shared with group2 (user4 is a member of group2)
* folder1 is shared with user2 (renamed to "folder (1)") and user2@server2
* and email2@maildomain2
*
* Then the access list to '/folder1/folder2/fileA' with $currentAccess is:
* [
Expand All @@ -1688,15 +1689,18 @@ public function userDeletedFromGroup($uid, $gid) {
* 'user2@server2' => ['node_id' => 23, 'token' => 'FooBaR'],
* ],
* public => bool
* mail => bool
* mail => [
* 'email1@maildomain1' => ['node_id' => 42],
* 'email2@maildomain2' => ['node_id' => 23],
* ]
* ]
*
* The access list to '/folder1/folder2/fileA' **without** $currentAccess is:
* [
* users => ['user1', 'user2', 'user4'],
* remote => bool,
* public => bool
* mail => bool
* mail => ['email1@maildomain1', 'email2@maildomain2']
* ]
*
* This is required for encryption/activity
Expand All @@ -1716,9 +1720,9 @@ public function getAccessList(\OCP\Files\Node $path, $recursive = true, $current
$owner = $owner->getUID();

if ($currentAccess) {
$al = ['users' => [], 'remote' => [], 'public' => false];
$al = ['users' => [], 'remote' => [], 'public' => false, 'mail' => []];
} else {
$al = ['users' => [], 'remote' => false, 'public' => false];
$al = ['users' => [], 'remote' => false, 'public' => false, 'mail' => []];
}
if (!$this->userManager->userExists($owner)) {
return $al;
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions lib/public/Share/IManager.php
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -256,9 +256,10 @@ public function userDeletedFromGroup($uid, $gid);
* |-folder2 (32)
* |-fileA (42)
*
* fileA is shared with user1 and user1@server1
* fileA is shared with user1 and user1@server1 email1@maildomain1
* folder2 is shared with group2 (user4 is a member of group2)
* folder1 is shared with user2 (renamed to "folder (1)") and user2@server2
* and email2@maildomain2
*
* Then the access list to '/folder1/folder2/fileA' with $currentAccess is:
* [
Expand All @@ -272,15 +273,17 @@ public function userDeletedFromGroup($uid, $gid);
* 'user2@server2' => ['node_id' => 23, 'token' => 'FooBaR'],
* ],
* public => bool
* mail => bool
* mail => [
* 'email1@maildomain1' => ['node_id' => 42],
* 'email2@maildomain2' => ['node_id' => 23],
* ]
*
* The access list to '/folder1/folder2/fileA' **without** $currentAccess is:
* [
* users => ['user1', 'user2', 'user4'],
* remote => bool,
* public => bool
* mail => bool
* mail => ['email1@maildomain1', 'email2@maildomain2']
Copy link
Member

@CarlSchwan CarlSchwan May 27, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is an api break :( not sure if we can change this, but if it never worked it's probably fine

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ASerbinski ASerbinski May 27, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it certainly is an API break. I went through the history and it never actually used the correct array key.

* ]
*
* This is required for encryption/activity
Expand Down