Skip to content

Conversation

@rullzer
Copy link
Member

@rullzer rullzer commented Jul 18, 2016

Followup of #418

Requires: nextcloud/3rdparty#5

@rullzer rullzer added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label Jul 18, 2016
@rullzer rullzer added this to the Nextcloud Next milestone Jul 18, 2016
@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

👍

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

I force pushed to update the merged 3rdparty repo :)

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

Other +1s are given in nextcloud/3rdparty#5 -> merging

@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke merged commit 68735c1 into master Jul 18, 2016
@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke deleted the remove_assetic branch July 18, 2016 13:55
R0Wi pushed a commit to R0Wi/server that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
…of enable/disable increased to 60. (nextcloud#430)

If ExApp is resource-heavy, stopping it now does not always free up
resources (only if it is implemented in ExApp itself, which is quite
rare)

That is why we add this PR to turn off the docker container when
clicking the "disable" button on ExApp.

With "manual installation" - nothing changes, we have nothing to turn
off and this is not supported.


Also, the timeout for a request to ExApp to turn on/off has been raised
from **30 seconds to 60 seconds**, which is still acceptable for UI so
as not to seem slow;


Resolves: nextcloud#410

Signed-off-by: Alexander Piskun <[email protected]>
R0Wi pushed a commit to R0Wi/server that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
…tcloud#436)

After the previous PR(nextcloud#430) which added stopping application containers
feature when shutting down, as @andrey18106 correctly noted during our
1:1 conversation:

we cannot rely on the application inside the docker container to be
ready to process the request at the moment the docker container is
turned on.

This PR introduces handling of it by checking health-check and
heartbeat.

Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants