Skip to content

Conversation

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member

fix #603 – ended up using half the size of Youtube’s 854*480px since that is a bit too big.

Please review @icewind1991 @oparoz @schiessle

@jancborchardt jancborchardt added enhancement design Design, UI, UX, etc. 3. to review Waiting for reviews feature: sharing labels Jul 28, 2016
@jancborchardt jancborchardt added this to the Nextcloud 11.0 milestone Jul 28, 2016
@mention-bot
Copy link

@jancborchardt, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @LukasReschke, @MorrisJobke and @oparoz to be potential reviewers

@oparoz
Copy link
Member

oparoz commented Jul 28, 2016

@jancborchardt Does it work nicely on mobile?

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member Author

jancborchardt commented Jul 28, 2016

@oparoz yep it does – you can simply make your window smaller to test. :) That’s also why I chose the smaller 427 * 240px instead of the full 854 * 480px. It will always use maximally 100% of the viewport width.

@icewind1991
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't this be min-width/height?

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member Author

@icewind1991 no, because then on mobile when the screen is smaller than this it will cause scrolling.

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member Author

Sooo – @oparoz @icewind1991 can you actually test this and give it thumbs up? ;D

@icewind1991
Copy link
Member

@icewind1991 no, because then on mobile when the screen is smaller than this it will cause scrolling.

Also set max-width 100%

Imo this is to small for non mobile screens

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

Imo this is to small for non mobile screens

Indeed:

bildschirmfoto 2016-07-28 um 17 50 45

Doubled size:

bildschirmfoto 2016-07-28 um 17 51 16

@jancborchardt jancborchardt force-pushed the video-container-size branch from 8a305c4 to e92723d Compare July 29, 2016 08:45
@jancborchardt jancborchardt force-pushed the video-container-size branch from e92723d to 748745d Compare July 29, 2016 08:47
@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member Author

Seems there was some inline stuff setting other max-widths which messed it up. Needed to add !important to fix it. Please review again :)

@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

A lot better now 👍 Works

@icewind1991
Copy link
Member

👍

@MorrisJobke MorrisJobke added 4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish and removed 3. to review Waiting for reviews labels Jul 29, 2016
@jancborchardt jancborchardt merged commit 696ff90 into master Jul 29, 2016
@jancborchardt jancborchardt deleted the video-container-size branch July 29, 2016 13:36
@MorrisJobke
Copy link
Member

@karlitschek Port to stable10?

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member Author

I’d say it’s a nice detail/fix for sharing and a backport would be cool.

@karlitschek
Copy link
Member

nice. please backport 👍

@jancborchardt
Copy link
Member Author

Backport at #668

GitHubUser4234 pushed a commit to GitHubUser4234/server that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2016
up the minimum size of the public share video a bit, use 16/9 ratio
R0Wi pushed a commit to R0Wi/server that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
…tcher

fix(exAppArchiveFetcher): correct apps_path handling
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4. to release Ready to be released and/or waiting for tests to finish design Design, UI, UX, etc. enhancement feature: sharing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Video sizing on the public share page

7 participants