-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
src: extract common DoBind and DoConnect methods #22315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The change looks fine but can you include a quick description of the rationale in the commit log and PR description? |
|
This PR needs a rebase against master to avoid the git failure in the CI. |
|
@maclover7 Can you rebase? |
|
Ping @maclover7 |
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication.
addaleax
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still LGTM
|
Passing Resume Build: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/19153/ |
|
Could use another review or two @nodejs/collaborators |
indutny
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM if CI is happy. Thanks!
src/tcp_wrap.cc
Outdated
| sockaddr_in addr; | ||
| int err = uv_ip4_addr(*ip_address, port, &addr); | ||
| if (family == AF_INET6 && | ||
| !args[2]->Uint32Value(env->context()).To(&flags)) return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this pass lint? I'd rather put return on a next line and add braces on this line and the line after return.
|
I have to share a somewhat amusing observation that while the intention of this PR is to reduce code (redundancy), GitHub measures it to remove as many lines as it adds (+23 −23). While I can appreciate the sentiment, I see this as increasing complexity in order to remove code duplication, shrinking the code base by 0 lines. -0 on this one. |
|
Fixed @indutny's comment New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/19590/ ✔️ |
|
Landed in 4b96a2a |
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. PR-URL: nodejs#22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#28222 PR-URL: nodejs#22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. Backport-PR-URL: #28222 PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
`TCPWrap::Bind` and `TCPWrap::Bind6` share a large amount of functionality, so a common `Bind` was extracted to remove duplication. Backport-PR-URL: #28222 PR-URL: #22315 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]>
TCPWrap::BindandTCPWrap::Bind6share a large amount of functionality, so a commonDoBindwas extracted to remove duplication.TCPWrap::Connect/TCPWrap::Connect6follow this same pattern, soDoConnectwas extracted from those two methods to also remove duplication.Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes